Cases

OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Motion of Defendants Patriot Preparatory Academy (“Academy”), Sean Smith, Charles Kabealo, Pamela Gould, H. David McIIrath, and C.P., a minor by and through his natural and custodial parent, Christian Penn, Sr. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) for Summary Judgment on all counts in Plaintiffs’ complaint. Pla

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

924 F.Supp. 1474 (1996) RE/MAX INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. REALTY ONE, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:94-CV-0062. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 19, 1996. *1475 *1476 *1477 *14

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge ERVIN and Judge WILKINS joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents questions about the authority of a United States court to regulate the salvage rights in the wreck of the luxury liner, R.M.S. Titanic, which lies in international waters. <

PER CURIAM: In this civil-rights case filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff-Appellant Dorothy Penton alleged that Defendants-Appellees Leon County, Florida (the “County”), Andrew Seitz, and Chad Abrams terminated her from her position as Lead Animal Control Officer for the County in retaliation for exercising her First Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. After careful review of

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Edmond A. MAEBANE III, Hospital Corpsman Second Class Petty Officer United States Navy, Appellant No. 24-0196 Crim. App. No. 202200228 Argued March 18, 2025—Decided September 18,

Case: 18-2220 Document: 69 Page: 1 Filed: 04/09/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEVRO CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION, Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2018-2220, 2018-2349

J-A12005-20 2021 PA Super 87 THE BERT COMPANY D/B/A : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NORTHWEST INSURANCE SERVICES : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : MATTHEW TURK, WILLIAM COLLINS, : JAMIE HEYNES, DAVID MCDONNELL, : FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE : AGENCY, LLC, FIRST NATIONAL

J-A12005-20 2021 PA Super 87 THE BERT COMPANY D/B/A : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NORTHWEST INSURANCE SERVICES : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : MATTHEW TURK, WILLIAM COLLINS, : JAMIE HEYNES, DAVID MCDONNELL, : FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE : AGENCY, LLC, FIRST NATIONAL

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWIN HARDEMAN, Nos. 19-16636 Plaintiff-Appellee/ 19-16708 Cross-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 3:16-cv-00525-VC 3:16-md-02741-VC MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00427-CV ___________________________ JUDY DE LA GARZA AND THOMAS M. DE LA GARZA, Appellants v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE CERTIFICATES, FIRST

USCA11 Case: 18-13894 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 1 of 142 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13894 ____________________ RAY CHARLES SCHULTZ, et al., Plaintiffs, BRADLEY HESTER,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge. I. Introduction Before the Court for disposition are the Plaintiffs MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 55), along with her supporting brief, supplement and exhibits (ECF Nos. 56-58), the Defendants’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 59), along with their supporting brief and exhib

Filed: April 28, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1934 (CA-93-902-N) R.M.S. Titanic, Inc., etc., Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Christopher S. Haver, et al, Parties in Interest - Appellants.

AMENDED OPINION PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge: This action, brought by several white citizens and registered voters of the State of North Carolina against various state and federal officials, challenges the constitutionality of the congressional redistricting1 plan (the Plan) adopted by the North Carolina General Assembly following the 1990 decennial census.2

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendants Lester J. Forst and other present and former officials of the Connecticut State Police (“State Police”) appeal from so much of an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, T.F. Gilroy Daly, Judge, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing claims brought principally under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control

408 U.S. 665 (1972) BRANZBURG v. HAYES ET AL., JUDGES. No. 70-85. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 23, 1972. Decided June 29, 1972.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. Edgar A. Zingman argued the cause for petitioner in No. 70-85. With him on the briefs was Robert C. Ewald. E. Barrett Prett

437 F.Supp. 1138 (1977) Mamie CROKER, Eric P. Travis, Chivis Davis, Sr., Robert W. DeBose and Leolin Dockins, Jr., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. The BOEING COMPANY (VERTOL DIVISION). Civ. A. No. 71-2168. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. June 20, 1977. *1139

171 F.3d 943 1999 A.M.C. 1330 R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest toTitanic Ventures, limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Christopher S. HAVER; Deep Ocean Expeditions, Parties inInterest-Appellants,andThe Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel, its engines, tackle,apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., located within one (1)nautical mile of a point located at 41o 43' 32" Nort

This suit was brought in trespass to try title to 495.22 acres of land (out of the Wilson Strickland Survey, patented July 3, 1847) now in Montgomery County, Texas. In December, 1931, numerous suits were filed by various alleged heirs of Wilson Strickland; one suit was filed by an alleged grandson of Allen Vince; another suit was filed by a group of Phillips heirs. W. T. Williams filed suit against Humble Oil Refining Company and other oil companies, landowners, and royalty-owners in possess