Cases

12 So.3d 974 (2009) James E. BRADFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Dr. Gail Shorter JUDSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 44,092-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 6, 2009. Rehearing Denied June 18, 2009. *977 Culpepper & Carroll, PLLC, by Bobby L. Culpepper, Jonesboro, for Appellant. Hudson, P

Opinion TOOMEY, Judge: ¶1 This case involves an auto-pedestrian accident. Marjorie Ann Brown appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Lennie Williams. Brown argues the court inappropriately applied workers’ compensation law in a negligence suit. She also argues summary judgment should have been denied becaus

772 So.2d 302 (2000) Charles H. BRADFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Veola McFarrin BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 33,985-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. November 1, 2000. Rehearing Denied November 30, 2000. *303 Charles Henry Bradford, Appellant in Proper Person. Charles E. Herring, Jr.,

OPINION BRADFORD, Judge. Between September 15, 2009, and June 20, 2010, William Wressell was employed by R.L. Turner Corporation (“RLTC”) as a concrete foreman and worked on two of RLTC’s construction projects. Both projects were public works projects subject to the Indiana Common Construction Wage Act (“CCWA”), and Wressell was classified and paid as a

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Petitioner Bradford has come forward with powerful evidence of both his innocence and his trial lawyers’ ineffective assistance in dealing with the critical scientific issue — the duration of the fire in Tamara Lohr’s bedroom. The State and the courts upholding Bradford’s convictions have not yet offered a plausible theory to account for the physical evidence of the fire an

Accordingly, the Court concludes that the claims in the current litigation are not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. B. FTCA Judgment Bar Defendants next argue that because this Court dismissed the FTCA claim in the 2015 Litigation (Count V), plaintiffs' current claims are barred by the FTCA's "judgment bar,"

297 F.3d 505 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Bradford Lee BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-3867. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 6, 2001. Decided and Filed: July 30, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Daniel Allen Brown (argued and

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Bradford McPhillamy brought unseaworthiness and Jones Act claims against appellee Brown & Root, Inc., his employer, after a frayed and overloaded cable on his barge snapped and struck him in the face. The district court denied McPhillamy’s motion for directed verdict and sent the case to the jur

LOLLEY, J. | T Louis J. Bradford, appearing pro se, appeals a judgment from the Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 1W, Parish of Webster, State of Louisiana (“OWC”), in favor of the Webster Parish Police Jury. For the following reasons, we affirm the OWC’s judgment. Facts On December 9, 2011, while employed as a driver with the Webster Parish Police Jury (“WPPJ”), Bradf

McFarland, J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a Ross County Common Pleas Court judgment denying Pele K. Bradford's motion to withdraw his guilty plea and motion for appointed counsel. On appeal, Appellant contends that 1) the trial court abused its discretion by denying him his Sixth Amendment right to counsel at the oral hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which he argues w

[Cite as State v. Bradford, 2020-Ohio-4563.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 20CA1109 vs. : BRYAN L. BRADFORD, : DECIS

Appeal by plaintiff, Tenia Marie Baugh, administratrix of the estate of Jeffery Scott Baugh, deceased, from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Billy James Bradford, Millard Bradford, and B B Wood Company, in plaintiff's action to recover damages based upon the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine. We affirm. Millard Bradford and his nephew, Billy James Bradford, were partners in a pulpwood dealership, which operated under the name B B Wood Company. Mil

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE RUIZ, No. 24-3378 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cv-01800- WQH-KSC v. THE BRADFORD EXCHANGE, OPINION LTD., Defendant - Appellant.

Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge FLOYD joined. WYNN, Circuit Judge: In this Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) case, an employer was deemed to have wrongly transferred assets from a pension plan that enjoyed a separate account feature to

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOUGLAS GORDON BRADFORD, No. 21-55038 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-05756- v. JAK-JC DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United S

640 F.3d 1063 (2011) NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Oregon Forest Industry Council; American Forest & Paper Association, Intervenors, v. Marvin BROWN, Oregon State Forester, in his official capacity; Stephen Hobbs; Barbara Craig; Diane Snyder; Larry Giustina; William Heffernan; William Hutchison; Jennifer Phillippi, (members of the Oregon Board of Forestry, in their offic

197 F.Supp.2d 574 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Timothy D. BROWN, et al. No. CRIM. 01-10012. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. March 3, 2002. B L S B Inc, c/o Betty L S Brown, Pineville, LA, Pro se. *575 W W T O Inc, c/o Tongula Veal, Alexandria, LA, Pro se. H Bradford Calvit, P

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cou

617 F.3d 1176 (2010) NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Oregon Forest Industry Council; American Forest & Paper Association, Intervenors, v. Marvin BROWN, Oregon State Forester, in his official capacity; Stephen Hobbs; Barbara Craig; Diane Snyder; Larry Giustina; William Heffernan; William Hutchison; Jennifer Phillippi, (members of the Oregon Board of Forestry, in their offic

Brown, Judge. *1042 [1] Bradford M. Crowder appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He raises four issues which we consolidate as whether the postconviction court erred in denying his petition. We affirm in part and reverse in part.