Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S CONSTRUCTION OF THE TERM “VALIDATION.” SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge. On April 28, 2011, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion And Order Construing Certain Claims Of United States Patent No. 5,481,464, United States Patent No. 5,831,-220, And United States Patent No. 6,105,014. See USHIP Intellectual Props., LLC v. Unit

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1647 Filed: August 17, 2018 PUBLIC VERSION* **************************************** 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) (Patent Infringement * Jurisdiction); * 35 U.S.C. §§ 100(d) (Definitions), 112 MYNETTE

OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge Ten years ago, defendant Team Worldwide Corporation (“TWW”) accused plaintiff Intex Recreation Corporation (“Intex”) of infringing the claims of TWW’s inflatable product patent. This lawsuit followed, and with it, the initiation of discovery, proceedings on a motion to dismiss, a reexamination

OPINION AND ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs objections to Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson’s claim construction decision. Plaintiff Intex Recreation Corporation asserts that Judge Robinson misconstrued the terms “socket” and “pump body”, as used in the air mattress patent ow

Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge *1029I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court is a Second Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim and a Second Motion to Strike an affirmative defense, filed by Plaintiff (and Counterclaim Defendant) Summers Manufacturing Company, Inc. Pl.'s Second Mot. Dismiss &

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION On November 24, 2015, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendant Graphic Packaging International, Inc.’s (“Graphic”) Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 25]. Plaintiff Inline Packaging, LCC (“Inline”) opposes the Motion. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DARRELL WILCOX and MICHAEL, ) MCGUIRE, individually and as ) Representatives of a class of participants ) and beneficiaries in and on behalf of the ) GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ) DEFINED CONTRIBUTION ) RETIREMENT PLAN, the

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2021 ME 16 Docket: Aro-19-500 Argued: September 17, 2020 Decided: March 30, 2021 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, and HORTON, JJ. Majority: MEAD, GORMAN, HUMPHREY, and HORTON, JJ. Dissent: JABAR, J. BERNARD NADEAU v. TWIN RIVERS PAPER COMPANY, LLC HORTON, J. [¶1] Bernard Nad

ACCEPTED 03-14-00765-CV 4402607 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge: The issue in this case is whether Edward A. Thomas, a Montana hunting guide and outfitter, may be found guilty by jury of two counts of conspiracy to violate the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 3371 et seq. The alleged object of the conspiracy was “to transport, receive and acquire elk in interstate commerce ... in violation of Montana

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

R.I. Phillips instituted suit in the superior court of Logan county, seeking reformation of a certain deed, executed to him by W.O. Mitchell and Helen E. Mitchell, his wife. Mitchell and wife answered by general denial, and filed a cross-petition, alleging fraud in the procurement of said deed, and prayed damages in the sum of $21,000 against D.M. Phillips, R.I. Phillips, H.E. Diehl, and Otto Meek. Upon motion of plaintiffs this cross-petition was stricken, after which plaintiff therein filed

GANTT, P. J. From a conviction, of murder in the first degree the defendant appeals. On or about the middle of March, 1901, H. B. Donegan, who had been living in Victor, Colorado, engaged in mining and investing in mining stocks in a limited way, appeared in Kansas City, Missouri. About that *498time he purchased a wagon and team at the sale stables of