Cases

JUSTICE WRIGHT, specially concurring: In this appeal, the record does not demonstrate that Bailey objected when the trial court scheduled matters related to the civil petition on the same date as matters related to the pretrial criminal proceedings. Nor does it appear to me that Bailey included this issue in his posttrial mot

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge: The be-on-the-lookout advisory (“BOLO”) to all law enforcement in Douglas County, Georgia, described its subject as a “loose cannon.” “Consider this man a danger to any [law-enforcement officer] in Douglas County and act accordingly,” the BOLO alarmingly warned and ominously instructed. What had the subject of the BOLO done to t

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-33L (Filed: November 8, 2017) ) BOYER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment v.

Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment Takings; Oregon Law; Scope of Easement OPINION FIRESTONE, Judge. Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) by the plaintiffs and the United States (“the government”). The plaintiffs claim

712 P.2d 1 (1985) 103 N.M. 655 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherwood BOYER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 8175. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 26, 1985. Paul G. Bardacke, Atty. Gen., Michael Dickman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee. Martha A. Daly, Rothstein, Bailey, Bennett, Daly & Donatelli, Sa

DECISION The matter before the Court involves a motion to dismiss brought by the Chief Judge of the Family Court, the Family Court Administrators, and the Magistrates of the Family Court (collectively "Court Defendants") alleging lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Super. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs brought

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Susan J. Boyer, * From the 35th District Court of Brown County, Trial Court No. CV1704122 Vs. No. 11-21-00252-CV * January 27, 2022 Springleaf Financial Services, Inc., * Per Curiam Memorandum Op

Opinion filed January 27, 2022 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00252-CV __________ SUSAN J. BOYER, Appellant V. SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 35th District Court

[Cite as State v. Boyer, 2026-Ohio-2425.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : C.A. No. 2025-CA-69 Appellee : : Trial Court Case Nos. 24-CR-0337; 2

MEMORANDUM OPINION ADAMS, Judge: Appellant (Boyer) sought licensure as a psychologist on two alternative bases. Ap-pellee (Board) was called upon to determine if Boyer’s education would allow him to sit for an examination under 59 O.S.Supp.1984 § 1362 or whether he could be licensed on a reciprocal basis without examination under 59 O.S.Supp.1984 § 1362 because he had been licensed by the State of Ohio since

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TWANDA BAILEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE et al., Defendants and Respondents. S265223 First Appellate District, Division One A153520 San Francisco City and County Superior Court CGC 15-549675 July 29, 2024

SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH v s. CHRISTOPHER M. BOYER / COMMONWEALTH v s. ROMUALD BERNAUD Docket: 23-164 / 23-188 / 24-95 / 23-192 Dates: December 13, 2024

959 N.E.2d 931 (2011) BOYER CORP EXCAVATING v. SHOOK CONST. No. 18A02-1007-PL-834. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 19, 2011. BROWN, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed. FRIEDLANDER, J., Concurs. BAILEY, J., Concurs.

302 N.W.2d 774 (1981) ALLIED REALTY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gregory K. BOYER and Wendy Boyer, Defendants and Appellees. Civ. No. 9867. Supreme Court of North Dakota. February 24, 1981. As Amended February 27, 1981. *775 Pitsenbarger & Miller, Moorhead, and Conmy, Feste & Bossart, Fargo, for pla

750 P.2d 1195 (1988) 90 Or.App. 103 BOYER METAL FAB, Inc., Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a Maryland Corporation, Respondent. A8601-00175; CA A44322. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 21, 1988. Decided March 9, 1988. *1196 Curt B. Anderson, Oregon City, arg

380 B.R. 486 (2008) In re Edwin D. BAILEY and Jamie S. Bailey, Debtors. Edwin D. Bailey and Jamie S. Bailey, Appellants, v. Andrew. W. Suhar, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. No. 07-8016. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit. Submitted: November 14, 2007. Decided and Filed: January 18, 2008. *48

Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, Mims, and McClanahan, JJ., and Russell, S.J. BRANDI BAILEY, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 131815 JUSTICE LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR. September 12, 2014 LOUDOUN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ET. AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY Alfred D. Swersky, Judge Designate In this appeal we consider whether the Virginia

186 P.3d 908 (2008) 2008-NMCA-084 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shishmon BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 26,500. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 27, 2008. Certiorari Denied May 14, 2008. *910 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Max Shepherd, Assistant Attorne

714 A.2d 458 (1998) Frank R. BOYER, Individually, & Frank R. Boyer, Executor of the Estate of Nancy H. Boyer, Appellant, v. Boyd WALKER and First Valley Bank, Appellees. (Two Cases). Frank R. BOYER, Individually, & Frank R. Boyer, Executor of the Estate of Nancy H. Boyer v. Boyd WALKER and First Valley Bank. Appeal of Boyd WALKER. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitte

CHAD M. BOYER v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF STATE POLICE No. 2009 CA 0700. Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 23, 2009. Not Designated for Publication FLOYD J. FALCON, Jr., DANIEL l. AVANT, Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee Chad M. Boyer KATHY DUHON WILLIAMS Counsel for Defendant-Appellant Department of Public Safety and C