⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Boyd v. The City of Buffalo”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-04-30 · Published · cited 4× · 193 A.D.3d 1386; 147 N.Y.S.3d 785; 2021 NY Slip Op 02685
Szuba v City of Buffalo (2021 NY Slip Op 02685) Szuba v City of Buffalo 2021 NY Slip Op 02685 Decided on April 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Boyd v. Constantinepublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 1993-04-08 · Published · cited 32× · 81 N.Y.2d 189; 613 N.E.2d 511; 597 N.Y.S.2d 605; 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 697
OPINION OF THE COURT Smith, J. The issue presented on this appeal is whether evidence that is the product of an unlawful search by the Buffalo City Police, and is suppressed in a criminal prosecution, may be used in an administrative proceeding commenced by the Division of State Police. On September 14, 1989, at approximately 2:00 a.m., two Buffalo City police officers observed petitioner
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2024-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § CYNTHIA DARLENE HALDERMAN and No. 08-24-00070-CV SHERRY JEAN LACINA, § Appeal from the
Boyd v. Brownpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-02-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 743
Boyd v Brown (2019 NY Slip Op 00743) Boyd v Brown 2019 NY Slip Op 00743 Decided on February 1, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 685 F. Supp. 2d 186; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57996
AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 IL App (1st) 140532
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Albert v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, 2014 IL App (1st) 123544 Appellate Court AN-JANETTE ALBERT, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Caption DERRION ALBERT, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant- Appellee. District & No.
State v. Boydpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-01-14 · Published · cited 0× · 417 S.W.3d 392; 2014 WL 114131; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 14
ORDER PER CURIAM. Michael Boyd appeals from his convictions for second-degree burglary and felony stealing after he broke into a grocery store and took several items. He contends the court erred in admitting five photographs of screen shots from the store’s surveillance video. Boyd also asserts that the court plainly erred in failing to intervene, sua sponte, when a police officer alluded to the
District Court, W.D. New York · 1991-09-19 · Published · cited 9× · 772 F. Supp. 1346; 14 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1439; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13301; 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,093; 1991 WL 189628
772 F.Supp. 1346 (1991) Sarah M. CIPRIANO and Jeune M. Miller, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NORTH TONAWANDA, NEW YORK, and North Tonawanda United Teachers, Defendants. No. CIV-84-80C. United States District Court, W.D. New York. September 19, 1991. Bell, Boyd & Lloyd (Christopher G. Mackaronis, of counsel), Washing
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-12-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 06589
Valdez v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 06589) Valdez v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 06589 Decided on December 24, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
New York County Courts · 2009-09-24 · Published · cited 1× · 26 Misc. 3d 482
OPINION OF THE COURT Michael Pietruszka, J. The plaintiffs-appellants (hereinafter appellants) appeal from orders of the Buffalo City Court (Ogden, J.) granted October 20, 2008 (No. E14033/2008) and October 27, 2008 (No. E12518/ 2008). Both the appellants and defendants-respondents (hereinafter respondents) submitted briefs and waived oral argument. Procedural History
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-10-28 · Published · cited 96× · 16 F.4th 992
20-4238 Melendez v. City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-4238-cv MARCIA MELENDEZ, JARICAN REALTY INC., 1025 PACIFIC LLC, LING YANG, TOP EAST REALTY LLC, HAIGHT TRADE LLC, ELIAS BOCHNER, 287 7TH AVENUE REALTY LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 6349
Greater Buffalo Acc. & Injury Chiropractic, P.C. v Geico Cas. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 06349) Greater Buffalo Acc. & Injury Chiropractic, P.C. v Geico Cas. Co. 2019 NY Slip Op 06349 Decided on August 22, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department </
District Court, E.D. New York · 2009-03-04 · Published · cited 7× · 256 F.R.D. 340; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18966; 2009 WL 561694
*342 MEMORANDUM & ORDER MAUSKOPF, District Judge. On February 5, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 156) (the “Report and Recommendation”) recommending denial of plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 to certify a class of similarly situated individu
Texas Supreme Court · 2026-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0864 ══════════ City of San Antonio, Petitioner, v. Nadine Realme, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002-04-30 · Published · cited 182× · 88 S.W.3d 203; 2002 Tenn. App. LEXIS 292; 2002 WL 772803
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 205 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 206 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Texas Supreme Court · 2018-03-23 · Published · cited 66× · 543 S.W.3d 772
Phil Johnson, Justice The question in this interlocutory appeal is whether the City of San Antonio has governmental immunity from a suit for damages arising out of a collision between a car and a motorcycle. The trial court denied the City's plea to the jurisdiction based on such immunity. The court of appeals affirmed. We reverse and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. I. Background O
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-02-14 · Published · cited 26× · 843 F. Supp. 2d 446; 2012 WL 473245; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18387
OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Marina Tsesarskaya, represented by counsel, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York, Lieutenant Michael McGuiness, Detective James Coll and Detective Sean Mulcahy, alleging violations of her constitutional rights under the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and under state law. (D
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2007-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
Officers of the United States Within the Meaning of the Appointments Clause A position to which is delegated by legal authority a portion of the sovereign powers of the federal government and that is “continuing” is a federal office subject to the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. A person who would hold such a position must be properly made an “Officer[] of the United States” by being appointed pursuant to the procedures specified in the Ap
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-06-24 · Published · cited 7× · 793 F. Supp. 2d 583; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68885; 2011 WL 2550457
793 F.Supp.2d 583 (2011) Isa MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Eric Pena, Richard Ortiz, Manuel Sepulveda, Robert Warshefskie, and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants. No. 08-CV-5183 (ENV)(JO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 24, 2011. *584 Brett H. Kle
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-06-21 · Published · cited 15× · 950 F. Supp. 2d 704; 2013 WL 3157499; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89301
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: Plaintiff Vincenzo Milione claims he was demoted for promoting Italian-American affirmative action and condemning discrimination against Italian Americans. Plaintiff brings federal, state, and local law claims against three institutions and three leaders of the institutions: the City Uni