Cases

Daniel P. Jordan III, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants in this sex-discrimination case ask the Court to dismiss Plaintiff Andrew Doe's Second Amended Complaint in its entirety. As detailed below, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [33] is granted in part but otherwise denied. I. Facts and Procedural History This case centers around a December 2, 2016 sexual encounter between Plaintiff Andrew

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

541 A.2d 614 (1988) Lincoln G. BOYCE, Appellant, v. Daisy Taylor BOYCE, Appellee. No. 85-1535. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 24, 1987. Decided May 11, 1988. *615 A. Palmer Ifill, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Glenn H. Carlson, with whom Diane E. Cafferty, Washington, D.C., was on t

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Procedural History .....................................................227 II. Findings of Fact........................................................227 A. Introduction.......................................................227 B. Temple’s Code of Conduct..........................................

786 F.Supp.2d 887 (2011) Ryan McFADYEN, Matthew Wilson and Breck Archer, Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:07CV953. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 31, 2011. *898 Robert C. Ekstrand, Ekstrand & Ekstrand, LLP, Durham, NC, for Plaintiffs. Jamie S. Gorelick, Jennifer M. O'C

OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Teresa Timm filed suit against Wright State University, University Provost Perry Moore, University President Kim Goldenberg, and Janet Gibbs, alleging that the University violated a number of her rights when it terminated her employment in December 1998. The district court granted summary judgment in fa

170 N.W.2d 104 (1969) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Donald Theodore BOYCE, Appellant. No. 41397. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 1, 1969. *106 Douglas Hall, Minneapolis, for appellant. Douglas M. Head, Atty. Gen., Richard H. Kyle, Sol. Gen., William B. Randall, County Atty., Warren Peterson, Asst. County Atty., St.

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Chief Judge, dissenting. This case presents for me one of the more obvious examples of how laudable societal objectives, recognized by both the Constitution and statute, have been thwarted by a decided lack of judicial prudence. Copyright protection as embodied in the Copyright Act of 1976 is intended as a public service to both the creator and the consumer of published works. Although t

OPINION Per Curiam: In this proper person appeal, we determine whether the district court properly granted summary judgment to the University and Community College System of Nevada (UCCSN) because, as a state entity, UCCSN is not subject to liability under Nevada’s False Claims Act (FCA).1 We also consider whether sanctions may be imposed on a complainant for having

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge, with whom CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges, join concurring in part and dissenting in part. I. My dissent is a narrow one: I agree with the majority in principle, but not in application. As to principle, I agree with the majority’s conclusion that this Court’s Cement Divisions test be dropped. See Maj. Op.

McBRIDE, Judge. This court is confronted with two medical malpractice suits which had been consolidated by the trial court for the purposes of trial; after a trial on the merits the suits were dismissed by a separate judgment in each, from which plaintiff has taken the present appeals. Edgar M. Stern, Jr., died on April 19, 1963, as an aftermath of an abdominal operation performed three days previously. T

The question for determination is, does the eight-hour enactment of the last session of the Nevada Legislature violate the Nevada constitution? True, it is claimed in the brief of counsel for petitioner that the said enactment violates also the constitution of the United States, in its fourteenth amendment, but this contention was abandoned at the oral argument; and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the supreme authority as to what may constit

30 F.3d 723 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2969, 93 Ed. Law Rep. 126 William L. JIBSON; Patricia A. Benefiel; Robert F. Croll;Robert E. Friar; Sandra B. Lewis; James E. Lindsey;Harold M. Molter; George L. Stengren; David Stewart; andAndrew J. Warber, on behalf of themselves and all otherssimilarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-NEA, Defendant-Appellee.

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. Keweenaw. Bay Indian Community appeals the district court’s dismissal of its complaint for failure to join an indispensable party in this action to enforce fishing rights pursuant to an 1842 treaty. 152, F.R.D. 562. We affirm. I ■ Kewéenaw Bay Indian Community, a band of Chippewa Indians in Michigan, initiated this action “to protect and preserve the lake trout

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. This case involves yet another challenge to a labor arrangement sanctioned by the Michigan Public Employment Relations Act. Under the Act, any public school employee who is not a member of his or her local education association may be required nonetheless to pay a service fee to the local association for its costs of statutory exclusive representation. Mich.Comp.Laws § 423.211. In Abo

449 Mich. 353 (1995) 535 N.W.2d 178 MICHIGAN ex rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. DIZZY DUCK Docket Nos. 98804, 98805. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided July 25, 1995. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, John D. O'Hair, Prosecuting Attorney, Andrea Solak, Chief, Special Operations,

203 Mich. App. 250 (1994) 511 N.W.2d 907 STATE OF MICHIGAN ex rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. DIZZY DUCK Docket Nos. 134045, 136610. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted April 20, 1993, at Detroit. Decided January 18, 1994, at 9:20 A.M. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor Gener

MARTIN, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. O’MALLEY, D.J. (pp. 880-883), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge. Upon the legalization of gambling in Detroit, the City enacted an ordinance establishing how it would issue three licenses for the operation of its new casinos. Everyone interested in this opportu