⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-02-14 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRED BOWERMAN; JULIA Nos. 18-16303 BOWERMAN, on behalf of 18-17275 themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:13- cv-00057-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER AND v. AMENDED
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-07-05 · Published · cited 24× · 60 F.4th 459
\FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRED BOWERMAN; JULIA Nos. 18-16303 BOWERMAN, on behalf of themselves 18-17275 and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00057- v. WHO FIELD ASSET SERVICES, INC.; FIELD ASSET SERVICES, LLC, n/k/a Xome OP
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-03-17 · Published · cited 2× · 242 F. Supp. 3d 910; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39000; 2017 WL 1036645
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS; GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO MAGDALENO AND DENYING AS TO COHICK AND ACKEL Re: Dkt. Nos. 152, 154, 155 William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This is a classwide misclassification ease involving vendors who perf
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-03-13 · Published · cited 26× · 61 F.4th 1053
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KATIE VAN, individually and on No. 21-36020 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:18-cv-00197- HRH v. LLR, INC., DBA LuLaRoe; and OPINION LULAROE, LLC, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022-09-22 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 20-CV-287 & 20-CV-288 CHRISTOPHER STEINKE, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, V. P5 SOLUTIONS, I
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-04-07 · Published · cited 24× · 176 F. Supp. 3d 930; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 499; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50579; 2016 WL 1394236
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 169 VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge The plaintiffs in this case — three people who have worked as Lyft drivers — move for preliminary approval of a class settlement agreement they reached with Lyft. Five other Lyft drivers, along with the Teamsters — a labor, union that is seeking to orga
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-06-28 · Published · cited 13× · 320 F.R.D. 464; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100418; 2017 WL 2793807
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs in this putative class action are distributors who delivered baked goods for Defendants Flower Foods, Inc., Flowers Baking Co. of California, Flowers Baking Co. of Modesto, and Flowers Bakeries Brands, Inc. (together, “Defendants” or “Flowers”). Plaintiffs assert California wage and hour claims based o
District Court, C.D. California · 2017-04-11 · Published · cited 1× · 322 F.R.D. 519
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL (DKT. 54) Present: The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction Raymond Alfred and Marvin Banish (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this putative class action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against Pepperidge Farm, Inc. (“PF” or “Defendant”)
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 298 F. Supp. 3d 1254
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs Miguel Valadez, Nora Ledesma, Manuel Ledesma, Anthony Green, Jr., *1258and Eleaquin Temblador ("Plaintiffs") moved for partial summary judgment on their employment status in this wage and hour case. Defendant CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. ("Defendant") moved to strike or dismi
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-05-20 · Published · cited 3× · 161 F. Supp. 3d 873; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67551; 2016 WL 2937480
ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION In preparation for a jury trial that commences on May 31, 2016, the parties have filed fifteen motions in limine (“the Motions”). The Court’s rulings on the Motions are set forth below.1 II. ANALYSIS Many of the parties’ motions in limi
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-11-16 · Published · cited 2× · 311 F.R.D. 590; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159477; 2015 WL 7422597
ORDER Re: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge The court has reviewed and considered the oral argument and all the briefing filed with respect to Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (“Motion”). For the following reasons, the court grants the Motion. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sarah Moore (“Moore” or
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-06-26 · Published · cited 11× · 629 F. Supp. 2d 848; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65659; 2009 WL 1835930
629 F.Supp.2d 848 (2009) Don BRIEGER, Harry Schultz, Robert Becker, and Alan Burstin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TELLABS, INC., Tellabs Operations, Inc., Richard C. Notebaert, Michael J. Birck, Brian J. Jackman, Debra Ragusa, Michael C. Smiley, and Joan E. Ryan, Defendants. Case No. 06 C 1882. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-06-01 · Published · cited 1× · 659 F. Supp. 2d 967; 46 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2569; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49747; 2009 WL 1565203
659 F.Supp.2d 967 (2009) Don BRIEGER, Harry Schultz, Robert Becker, And Alan Burstin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TELLABS, INC., Tellabs Operations, Inc., Richard C. Notebaert, Michael J. Birck, Brian J. Jackman, Debra Ragusa, Michael C. Smiley, and Joan E. Ryan, Defendants. No. 06 C 1882. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-06-28 · Published · cited 89× · 610 F.3d 452; 49 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1652; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13153; 2010 WL 2557767
610 F.3d 452 (2010) Deborah A. KENSETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN HEALTH PLAN, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-3219. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 27, 2009. Decided June 28, 2010. *455 Lisa C. Goldman, Attorney (argued), Lawton & Cates, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appella
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007-03-28 · Published · cited 3× · 480 F. Supp. 2d 1061; 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1983; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23318; 2007 WL 936745
480 F.Supp.2d 1061 (2007) Joseph J. NELSON and Michael Wycoff, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC., Employees' Pension Committee for Employees' Thrift Plan of Indianapolis Power & Light Company, John R. Hodowal, Ramon L. Humke, Bryan G. Tabler, Max Califar, Steve J. Plunkett, and Tom A. Steiner, Defendants. No. 1:02-cv-0477-DFH-TAB. Uni
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 1987-11-05 · Published · cited 109× · 744 S.W.2d 170; 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 9279; 1987 WL 30349
744 S.W.2d 170 (1987) GREENSTEIN, LOGAN & COMPANY, et al., Appellants, v. BURGESS MARKETING, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 10-87-005-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. November 5, 1987. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1987. *176 F. Glenn Smith, III and Guy M. Hohmann, Brill & Brooks, Scott Douglas Cunningha
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983-10-17 · Published · cited 3× · 573 F. Supp. 405; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12696
573 F.Supp. 405 (1983) GRAND ISLANDER HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, and The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-0304-S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. October 17, 1983. *406 *407 Higgins,
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986-10-06 · Published · cited 3× · 399 N.W.2d 49; 155 Mich. App. 40; 1986 Mich. App. LEXIS 2962
155 Mich. App. 40 (1986) 399 N.W.2d 49 MICHIGAN BELL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket No. 81467. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 6, 1986. Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg (by Albert Ernst and Jon R. Robinson), H. Wayne Wells and John M. Dempsey, for Mi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-06-26 · Published · cited 12× · 71 F.4th 724
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SEAPLANE ADVENTURES, LLC, Nos. 21-17105 Plaintiff-Appellant/ 22-15027 Cross-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:20-cv-06222- WHA COUNTY OF MARIN, Defendant-Appellee/
California Court of Appeal · 2025-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/1/25; Opinion on remand from Supreme Court CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE PATRICK KRUG, B320588 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV14538) v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA S