Cases

[1] OPINION [2] Appellant, David Lloyd Bowden, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Cleveland County, Case No. CRF-72-118, for the offense of Escape From the Penitentiary, his punishment was fixed at two (2) years imprisonment and from said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court. [3] At the non-jury trial, Gary Forbes testified that he was employed as a Lieutenant of Secu

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Travis Woods (“plaintiff’ or “Woods”) filed this action on November 8, 2010. He filed an amended complaint on July 19, 2011, against defendants the City of Utica (“the City”); Officer Holt of the Utica Police Department (“Officer Holt”); Oneida County (“the County”); Daniel Middau

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 08, 2015 Session ALEX FRIEDMANN, ET AL. v. MARSHALL COUNTY, TN, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Marshall County No. 17017 J. B. Cox, Chancellor ________________________________ No. M2014-01413-COA-R3-CV – Filed June 24, 2015 _________________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSEPH ANTHONY BARRETT, Defendant and Appellant. S124131 Imperial County Superior Court CF5733 June 23, 2025 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justices

01/13/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 21, 2020 Session FATMA ADEL SEKIK v. NEHAD ABDELNABI ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 126002 Gregory S. McMillan, Judge ___________________________________

11/18/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 21, 2020 Session FATMA ADEL SEKIK v. NEHAD ABDELNABI ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 126002 Gregory S. McMillan, Judge ___________________________________

50 Cal.4th 99 (2010) 112 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 235 P.3d 62 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICHARD LACY LETNER and CHRISTOPHER ALLAN TOBIN, Defendants and Appellants. No. S015384. Supreme Court of California. July 29, 2010. *114 J. Thomas Bowden and R. Clayton Seaman, Jr., unde

Thompson, Justice. A jury convicted Demarcus Ali Sears of kidnapping with bodily injury and armed robbery, and imposed a sentence of death. The evidence adduced at trial showed that Sears and Phillip Williams kidnapped the victim, Gloria Wilbur, as she left a supermarket in Cobb County, Georgia; that Sears assaulted Ms. Wilbur with brass knuckles, put her in her car and drove north; that Sears raped Ms. Wilbur in Tennessee;

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

Abrams, J. A jury found the defendant, John Reynolds, guilty of murder in the first degree on the theories of extreme atrocity or cruelty and premeditation, G. L. c. 265, § 1, and of wilfully and maliciously burning a motor vehicle, G. L. c. 266, § 5. The defendant appeals. The defendant claims the trial judge erred in restricting his cross-examination of the chief police investigator on deficiencies in the police investigation,

909 So.2d 213 (2002) Phillip Wayne TOMLIN v. STATE of Alabama. CR-98-2126. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. May 31, 2002. Opinion Overruling Rehearing November 22, 2002. *223 Bernard E. Harcourt, New York, New York, for appellant. William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and James R. Houts and Kristi L. Dea

OPINION OF THE COURT Albert M. Rosenblatt, J. The prosecution, by application dated June 8, 1981, has moved for an order authorizing the acquisition of photographs and dental impressions of the defendant’s lower teeth and bite.1 The defendant has been arrested for murder in the first degree upon an allegation, in a felony complaint dated June 8, 1981, that o

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

1. A defense of payment, discharge, and satisfaction may be sustained by proof of circumstances sufficient to justify the inference sought to be drawn therefrom. 2. To a suit seeking to enforce a written contract, an answer alleging that the maker was ill, weak, and mentally deficient, that there existed a confidential relationship between the parties to the contract, which relationship was stated in detail, that there was great mental disparity between them, that there was gross inade