Cases

LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUSAN L. PERRICONE, LIVINGSTON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD AND LOUISIANA AUTOMOBILE RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY. LYNDA EASLEY v. SUSAN PERRICONE AND TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD[1] No. 2009 CA 1176, Consolidated with No. 2009 CA 1177. Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit. March 30, 2010. Not Designated for Publica

RASHAD JOHNSON, RHONDA * NO. 2020-CA-0552 BROWN, LASHE BOUDREAUX AND KAIRON * JONES COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * BYRON SCOTT AND THE STATE OF LOUISIANA SEWAGE AND WATER ******* BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS

McClendon, j. 12Instant Replay Sports, Inc. (Instant Replay) and Charles Orzehoskie (Orzeho-skie) appeal a trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) and denying their corollary motion for partial summary judgment. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s judgment granting Allstate’s motion, render judgment granting plaintiffs’ corollary motion for partia

68 So.3d 570 (2010) James SIMS v. USAGENCIES CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and McHenry Jackson. No. 2010 CA 1120. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 22, 2010. Rehearing Denied August 5, 2011. *571 Stephanie M. Possa, Joseph C. Possa, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant James Sims. Anth

49 So.3d 17 (2010) Vanessa EMERY and Nedra Wrights v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, T & T Seafood, Inc., Joshua Tourere, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. No. 2010 CA 0327. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. September 10, 2010. *18 David J. Schex

|xTHIBODEAUX, Judge.- Plaintiff, Mary Hidalgo, filed suit against Casualty Reciprocal Exchange Insurance Company seeking uninsured motorist coverage under a policy purchased by her ex-husband, Michael Hidalgo. The trial court found that Mary was not covered by |2the policy as she and Michael were not residents of the same household at the time of her accident. Ms. Hidalgo appeals that ruling. We affirm.</

HERO LANDS COMPANY, * NO. 2022-CA-0224 L.L.C. * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; FOURTH CIRCUIT TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS * & REFINING USA, INC.; STATE OF LOUISIANA PIONEER NATURAL ******* RESOURCES, INC.; KEY OPERATING & PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.L.C.

Opinion by JUDGE NAVARRO 1 Defendant, Ryan D. Collins, appeals the summary judgment entered against him and in favor of plaintiff, GEICO Casualty Company (GEICO). Ryan was injured in a motorcycle accident and sought underinsured motorist coverage under an insurance policy issued by GEICO to Amanda Collins, his wife at the time of the accident.1 GEICO denied coverage on the ground

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinions || February 25, 2016 Colorado Court of Appeals -- February 25, 2016 2016 COA 30. No. 15CA0060. GEICO Casualty Co. v. Collins. COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016 COA 30 Court of Appeals No. 15CA0060

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant David Lee Willis (Willis) brought this diversity action against defendant-appellee Midland Risk Insurance Company (Midland) for breach of an insurance contract and for tortious breach by the insurer of its implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing with its insured. On the latter claim, Willis sought both actual and punitive dama

496 So.2d 439 (1986) Carol HARPER v. Leon J. BOUDREAUX. No. CA 85 0599. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 15, 1986. Robert Mack, Hammond, for plaintiff-appellant Carol Harper, et al. Ron S. Macaluso, Hammond, for defendant-appellant Leon J. Boudreaux, et al. Before EDWARDS, WATKINS and PONDER[*], JJ.

GONZALES, Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ suit against defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company on a motion for summary judgment. The procedural background of this case is somewhat complex. The following recitation is taken from a previous opinion of this court written by Judge Savoie (Continental Casualty Insurance Company et al. v. RAS Management Co., Inc. et a

GRISBAUM, Judge. The defendant, Ultramar Enterprises, Inc., suspensively appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Earl Boudreaux, ordering a sheriffs sale of property subject to a mortgage held by Mr. and Mrs. Boudreaux. We affirm. Mr. and Mrs. Boudreaux are the holders of a promissory note secured by Ultramar Enterprises, Inc. payable to the order of bearer in the amount of $201,0

OPINION OF THE COURT Gerard E. Delaney, J. This matter involves the determination of the rights of subrogation of an insurance company upon its payment of funds to its insured under “Supplementary Uninsured Motorist Insurance” (commonly known as underinsurance) under Insurance Law § 167 (2-a). On August 5,1980, Helen Buxbaum, while operating a motor vehicle owned by her husband, Jeffre

334 So.2d 692 (1975) Laura L. Dupre CALLAIS et al. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. No. 56120 Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 4, 1975. Dissenting Opinion December 17, 1975. On Rehearing June 21, 1976. *693 Charles E. Leche, Normann & Normann, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-applicants. Larry

559 F.3d 390 (2009) Tara MONISTERE; Brandon Monistere, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-31149. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 17, 2009. *391 Patricia S. LeBlanc (argued), Michael L. Fantaci, LeBlanc Butler, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.</

ORDER CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff Founders Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff” or “Founders”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33). Defendant Susan Tome, as Personal Representative of The Estate of Weston Tome, Deceased (“Defendant” or “Tome Estate”) filed a Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. I. Introduction Lapolla Industries, a citizen of Texas and Delaware, manufactures spray polyurethane foam (“SPF”) insulation. Ev-anston Insurance Company, a citizen of Illinois, issued Lapolla three insurance policies, two commercial general liability (“CGL”) policies and one excess liability policy. The policies required E

ORDER SECTION: “G”(2) NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this litigation, Plaintiff Ochsner Clinic Foundation (“Ochsner”) alleges that Defendant Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”) breached its insurance policy by failing to pay additional amounts owed to Ochsner, and that Lexington acted in bad faith during the adjustment process.1