Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This matter is pending for consideration of Defendants Bosch Rexroth Corporation (“Bosch”), Dan Reynolds, Geoff O’Nan, and Valenda Allen’s motion for summary judgment. [Record No. 49] For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in its entirety. I. Plaintiff LaShaunna Banks worked as an assembl

758 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2010) BRISTOL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada Limited Partnership, Plaintiff, v. BOSCH REXROTH INCORPORATED, a Pennsylvania corporation, Robert Bosch Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Bosch Rexroth Canada Corp./Corporation Bosch Rexroth Canada, a Canadian corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-cv-00011-PAB-MJW. United States District Court, D. Colorado.

684 F.Supp.2d 1245 (2010) BRISTOL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada Limited Partnership, Plaintiff, v. BOSCH REXROTH INCORPORATED, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Robert Bosch Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Bosch Rexroth Canada Corp/Corporation Bosch Rexroth Canada, a Canadian Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-cv-00011-PAB-MJW. United States District Court, D. Colorado.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ARLANDER KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge. In this lawsuit, the United States Government, on behalf of Pileco, Inc.,1 has sued Slurry Systems, Inc. (“SSI”) and its surety, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (“F & D”), seeking to recover money allegedly owed on a contract executed in connection with a reservoir project under

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after multiple orders, opinions, and trial. Plaintiffs are sureties that completed performance of a contract upon the bankruptcy of J.A. Jones Construction Company (“J.A Jones”), a joint venturer with Guy F. Atkinson Construction Company (“Atkinson” and, together with J.A. Jones, the “Joint Venture”), in the construction of t

MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge, United States District Court Daryl Laferty filed this disability-discrimination action in Jefferson County Circuit Court against his employer, United Parcel Service, Inc., alleging UPS failed to accommodate his disability as required by the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (KCRA), Ky. Rev. Stat. § 344.010, et seq. UPS removed Laferty’s action to this Cour

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0053p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HALEY HRDLICKA, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0344p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TAWNA BOWLES, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0021p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HALEY HRDLICKA, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0074p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT KASSI TCHANKPA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0197p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ LEE BRIGGS, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge. Defendants Siemens Corporation, Siemens AG, Waagner-Biro Binder AG in Abwicklung, Waagner-Biro Binder Beteili-gungs AG, WB Holding AG, Binder and Co AG, Bosch Rexroth AG, Bosch Rexroth Corporation, and Omniglow Corporation (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Shira A. Scheindlin, Judge), dated November 12

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0063p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JEANNE KING, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0058p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL FISHER, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0298p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CHERRYL KIRILENKO-ISON; SUSAN BAUDER-SMITH, ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │ │

OPINION & ORDER SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. These cases arise from a disaster that occurred on November 11, 2000, in which a ski train in Kaprun, Austria caught fire, killing 155 people. American and foreign survivors and/or relatives of those who died in the fire brought a number of lawsuits in federal court against numerous defendants alleging, inter alia, negligence and strict l

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Greg N. Stivers, Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment' (DÑ 71), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 96), Defendant’s Motion to Strike (DN 104), Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (DN 107), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Resubmit (DN 125), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Resubmi

779 F.Supp.2d 416 (2011) KAMCO INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC., Plaintiff, v. LOVEJOY, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-1407. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 10, 2011. *418 Mitchell A. Kramer, Kramer & Kramer, LLP, Rydal, PA, for Plaintiff. Brian K. Parker, Pittsburgh, PA, Edwin E. Brooks, Kristin Hen

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, United States District Judge Pending before the court are three Rule 56 motions. The defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Co. (“JNL”) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (“JNL Motion”) seeking dismissal of all claims brought by the plaintiff Josh Wheeler (“Wheeler”) (Docket No. 32), to which Wheeler has filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 46), and JNL has filed

230 F.Supp.2d 392 (2002) In re SKI TRAIN FIRE IN KAPRUN, AUSTRIA ON NOVEMBER 11, 2000. No. 02 Civ. 3101. MDL No. 1428(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 14, 2002. *393 *394 Robert Swift, Martin J. D'Urso, Kohn, Swift & Graf, PC, Philadelphia, PA, Jay J. Rice, Nagel, Rice, Dr