Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Bonilla v. Alameda County Superior Court”
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. In February 1986 Neomi Hernandez went to work for the State’s Attorney of Cook County, Illinois. Hernandez is active in the Democratic Party and twice ran in its primary for the state house of representatives (most recently in March 1992). She has joined litigation to promote her faction’s fortunes. E.g., Hastert v. State Board of Elections,
People v. Estradapublic domain
Filed 12/16/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160032 v. PAUL ESTRADA, (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FC33461) Defendant and Appellant.
Guerrero v. City of L.A.public domain
Filed 1/17/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE DELIA GUERRERO et al., B326033 c/w B327032 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles v. County
People v. Brookspublic domain
Filed 12/22/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A158988 v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. JASON BROOKS, No. 160765A) Defendant and Appellant. Jason Brooks appeals the
People v. Henriquezpublic domain
Kruger, J. *7 Defendant Christopher Henriquez killed his pregnant wife and their two-year-old daughter. He stipulated at trial that he killed the victims with malice aforethought, but asserted that the murders were not premeditated and were instead the unplanned
People v. Rosepublic domain
Filed 5/29/14 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A135974 v. CAMERON ROSE, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 168323)
People v. Dillardpublic domain
Filed 3/29/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A141998 v. NANETTE SHEREE DILLARD, et al., (Alameda County Supe
Westport Insurance v. Northern California Reliefpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Between September 2012 and January *8732013, four women1 filed suit in California state court alleging that as students in the 1990s, they were sexually abused by Mora-ga School
People v. Adananduspublic domain
69 Cal.Rptr.3d 25 (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 496 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Pierre ADANANDUS, Defendant and Appellant. No. A116212. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three. November 30, 2007. *28 Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, Dane R. Gill
People v. Seumanupublic domain
Opinion WERDEGAR, J. A jury in Alameda County Superior Court convicted Ropati Seumanu in 2000 of the first degree murder of Nolan Pamintuan (Pen. Code, § 187; all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated), kidnapping to commit robbery (§ 209, subd. (a)), and first degree robbery (§ 211). The jury also sustained special circu
People v. Taylorpublic domain
47 Cal.4th 850 (2009) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH DESMOND TAYLOR, Defendant and Appellant. No. S054774. Supreme Court of California. December 24, 2009. *855 Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Jay Colangelo, Assistant State Public Defender, Jessica K. McGuire, Ellen
People v. Tullypublic domain
Filed 7/30/12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S030402 v. ) ) RICHARD CHRISTOPHER TULLY, ) ) Alameda County Defendant and Appellant. )
People v. Dykespublic domain
46 Cal.4th 731 (2009) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERNEST EDWARD DYKES, JR., Defendant and Appellant. No. S050851. Supreme Court of California. June 15, 2009. *741 Karen L. Landau, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Robe
Santiago v. Bobbpublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. *156El 13 de febrero de 1984, el periódico El Mundo publico un artículo de la periodista Maggie Bobb denominado “Vin-culan senadores con manejos ADT”, que en lo pertinente, im-putaba al entonces senador Efraín Santiago haber utilizado sus influencias políticas para sacar prove
People v. Carpenterpublic domain
Opinion CHIN, J. Evidence at the guilt and penalty trials established that defendant is the “Trailside Killer” who terrorized Californians in 1980 and 1981. Over several months, he assaulted hikers on remote paths in Santa Cruz and Marin Counties, shooting to death seven at close range with a .38-caliber Rossi revolver and raping some of them. An eighth shooting victim survived to testify against him.
People v. Carpenterpublic domain
Opinion CHIN, J. Evidence at the guilt and penalty trials established that defendant is the “Trailside Killer” who terrorized Californians in 1980 and 1981. Over several months, he assaulted hikers on remote paths in Santa Cruz and Marin Counties, shooting to death seven at close range with a .38-caliber Rossi revolver and raping some of them. An eighth shooting victim survived to testify against him.
United States v. Washingtonpublic domain
TABLE OF CONTENTS ORDER PAGE Summary of Memorandum Order and Preliminary Injunction Re Salmon Allocation for 1978 and Subsequent Seasons (8/11/78, as corrected 8/16/78 and amended 9/27/78 and 10/27/78) 1416 Additional Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Re Makah v. Lower Elwha Dispute Re Hoko River (11/28/78) 1418 Order Re Coastal Salmon Fisherie
United States v. State of Washingtonpublic domain
626 F.Supp. 1405 (1985) UNITED STATES of America et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 9213. United States District Court, W.D. Washington. *1406 *1407 *1408 *1409
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams