Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bond v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority”
OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMONDpublic domain
OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMOND2023 OK 24Case Number: 120543Decided: 03/21/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 24, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMONDpublic domain
OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMOND2023 OK 24Case Number: 120543Decided: 03/21/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 24, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. OKLA
OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMONDpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMOND Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only <
OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
Bond v. City of Tahlequahpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 1, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CI
2009 OK 15 JERRY FENT, as a resident taxpayer, citizen and voter of the State of Oklahoma, and all other similar persons, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, Respondent. No. 106611. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. March 24, 2009. Jerry R. Fent, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Pro Se Petitioner. Lynn C. Rogers, Scott D.
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMAN CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMAN2020 OK 104Case Number: 118950Decided: 12/07/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 104, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION O
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LANCEpublic domain
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LANCE2023 OK 98Case Number: SCBD-7183 (Cons. w/ SCBD-7214)Decided: 10/10/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 98, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
4 P.3d 677 (2000) 2000 OK 23 OKLAHOMA CITY URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a public body corporate, Appellee, v. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH AUTHORITY OF OKLAHOMA, a statutory agency of the State of Oklahoma, Defendant, Forrest "Butch" Freeman, Oklahoma County Treasurer, Appellant, The City of Oklahoma City, a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma; Independent School District No. 89; Vo-Tech School District N
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LIPEpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LIPE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LANCEpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LANCE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. ETHERINGTON Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
In re Adoption of the 2005 Revisions to the Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions—Criminalpublic domain
ORDER ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL (SECOND EDITION) T1 On January 8, 2005, The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Committee for Preparation of Uniform Jury Instructions submitted its report and recommendations to the Court for the adoption of amendments to Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Criminal (Second Edition). The Court has reviewed the report by the committee and recommendations for the adop
WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METAL WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METAL2019 OK 45Case Number: 112844Decided: 06/18/2019THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2019 OK 45, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS S
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAULKpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAULK STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAULK2021 OK 46Case Number: SCBD-6974Decided: 09/28/2021THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2021 OK 46, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEAS
188 P.3d 1281 (2008) 2008 OK CR 21 STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. David W. PRATER, District Attorney, Petitioner v. The DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, The Honorable Jerry D. Bass, District Judge, Respondent. No. PR-2008-157. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. June 27, 2008. ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LEVISAYpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LEVISAY STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LEVISAY2020 OK 86Case Number: SCBD-6827Decided: 10/06/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 86, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RE
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARROZpublic domain
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARROZ Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us
Martin v. City of Oklahoma Citypublic domain
ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant City of Oklahoma City [Doc. No. 56], Defendants Bill Vetter, Ryan Sorrels, Russell Mock, and Jacob McClain [Doc. No. 59]; and Plaintiff Antjuan Martin [Doc. No. 61], pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.1 Defendants seek a judgment as a matter of law in this a
MARK ROBERTSON v. JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE — INSTITUTIONAL DIVISIONpublic domain
325 F.3d 243 Mark ROBERTSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Janie COCKRELL, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee. No. 00-10512. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 14, 2003. Randy Schaffer (argued), The Schaffer Firm, Houston, TX, for Petitione