Cases

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 25–0559 Submitted March 25, 2026—Filed May 1, 2026 Lisa Boggess, as administrator of the Estate of Brent Boggess and as next friend to minors Z.B. and J.B.; Drake L. Boggess; and Kim Buttshaw, Appellants, vs. City of Waterloo and Kenneth Schaff,

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

On Motion for Rehearing. Appellees have filed a motion for a rehearing insisting that the crossing involved in this case was shown to be an extrahazardous crossing which required more than ordinary care on the part of appellant. We have again carefully considered this matter and again arrived at the conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to establish the fact that this crossing was more than an ordinarily hazar

63 F.Supp. 229 (1945) UNITED STATES v. SCHINE CHAIN THEATRES, Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 223. District Court, W. D. New York. October 8, 1945. *230 *231 Wendell Berge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert L. Wright, John F. Clagett, Harold L. Schilz, Albert Boggess, and Philip Marcus, Sp. Assts. to Att

This is a suit in equity to set aside, on the grounds of fraud, mental incapacity and undue influence, certain deeds conveying real estate. The evidence is too voluminous to attempt to set forth even by way of summaries the testimony of the fifty odd witnesses. However, the facts showing the general setting of the controversy, the parties thereto, their relations to each other and to the subject-matter of the action, are for the most part not in dispute. These will be given in general outline