Cases

CLAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part. . Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan appeals the district court’s decision certifying a class of plaintiffs pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1)(A) and (b)(3), with Plaintiffs, Pipe-fitters Local 636 Insurance Fund, and its trustees (collectively “Plaintiffs”), serving as lead plaintiffs. The majority reverses the district court, and decertifi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Builders Trust of New México’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, filed November 17, 2016 (Doc. 4)(“MTD”); and (ii) Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed December 6, 2016 (Doc. 10)(“Motion for Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on'January 23, 2017." The primary is

Case: 22-1092 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 12/16/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ADASA INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2022-1092 ______________________ Appeal from the United Sta

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 27)("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar Plaintiff Janice Nowell's claims against Defendants Medtronic Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien LP, and Medtronic PLC for negligence, strict

OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge. Plaintiff, Monroe Truck Equipment, Inc., owns U.S. Patent No. 8,596,376, for an apparatus for mounting a wing plow to a vehicle. Plaintiff contends that defendant, Universal Truck Equipment, Inc., infringes the '376 patent with its Uni-Glide mounts. Defendant denies infringement and contends that the '376 patent is invalid under 35- U.S.C. §

DEFENDANT NAUGHTY DOG, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (filed 06/10/13; Dkt. No. 105) GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. Court hears oral argument. The Tentative circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court’s final ruling. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant Naughty Dog, Inc.’s response to the amended complaint will be due 21 days from

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1425C Filed: November 30, 2018 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: January 2, 20191 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * SIGMATECH, INC., * * Protestor, * * v.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-816C Filed: November 30, 2022 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: February 10, 20231 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** KOAM ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC., * * * Protestor,

*1213 HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Shawron Lounds appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her former employer, Lineare, Inc. (“Lineare”), on her claims of a hostile work environment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ HIGHMARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLCARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ 2011-1219 __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texa

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKTS. 44, 45] Hon. Vanessa L. Bryant, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case is about the decision of Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) to terminate Plaintiffs retirees’ full medical coverage benefits. Plaintiffs David Kelly, Richard Norko, Annette Dobbs, and Peter Dellolio (collec

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. DISCUSSION Plaintiff Suzanne Matthews (“Plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, brings this action against Corning Incorporated (“Corning”), David Dawson-Elli, Michael Moore, Cynthia Giroux, and Marc Giroux (collectively, the “Defendants”), alleging gender discrimination and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of t

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ' VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge .This is a. civil action filed by the Plaintiff, Ronald Knight, against the Defendant, his former employer, General Telecom, Inc. (“GTI”). The Complaint alleges that: the Plaintiff was fired (and not reinstated) by the Defendant, because of his disability, diabetes,

Hefner v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 2015 NCBC 111. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE 12 CVS 3088 STEPHEN HEFNER, on behalf of ) himself and all others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiff, )

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-926C Filed: December 29, 2020 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: January 15, 20211 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * AGMA SECURITY SERVICE, INC., * * * Protestor,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-740C Filed: March 4, 2021 Reissued: March 16, 20211 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * AGMA SECURITY SERVICE, INC., * * * Protestor,

Case: 19-2041 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 07/14/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PACKET INTELLIGENCE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC., NETSCOUT SYSTEMS TEXAS, LLC, FKA TEKTRONIX TEXAS, LLC DBA TEKTRONIX COMMUNICATIONS, Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2019-2

MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge: *181Plaintiff Tamika Daniel commenced a putative class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against Defendant Mondelez International Inc. (Compl., Docket Entry No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that "non-functional slack-fill" ("excessive empty space") in Defendant's Swedish Fish b

Prost, Chief Judge. The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation ("WARF") sued Apple Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,781,752 ("the '752 patent"). After a two-week, bifurcated trial, a jury found Apple liable for infringement and awarded over $

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Currently before the Court are an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23), Brief in Support (Doc. 24), and Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. 25) submitted by Defendants Kimbel Mechanical Systems (“KMS”), Rob Kimbel, Brad Smith, and Dustin Hughes (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff Sheil