Cases

(Fayette) Affirmed

[Cite as Bloom v. Bloom, 2020-Ohio-4107.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO TED EUGENE BLOOM, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant/ : Cross-Appellee, CASE NOS. 2019-T-0078 - vs - :

(Fayette) Affirmed

(Fayette) Affirmed

(Fayette) Affirmed

LUCAS, Judge. Marshall Bloom, a beneficiary and former personal representative of the late Leon Bloom’s estate, challenges the circuit court’s order denying his motion to recover his attorney’s fees. The circuit court correctly construed the limits of our mandate from an earlier appeal and rejected Marshall’s 1 “common

Dismissed.

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2021 ME 59 Docket: Ken-21-83 Submitted On Briefs: October 20, 2021 Decided: November 23, 2021 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. ANNALEE R. BLOOM v. LAWRENCE P. BLOOM GORMAN, J. [¶1] Lawrence P. Bloom appeals from a divorc

Bloom v Hilpert (2023 NY Slip Op 01859) Bloom v Hilpert 2023 NY Slip Op 01859 Decided on April 11, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

J-A13032-25 2025 PA Super 143 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : TREVOR JOEL BLOOM :

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ANTHONIA OGBANUFE, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CHARLES BLOOM and WENDY BLOOM, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. 4D21-1930 and 4D21-2004 [June 16, 2022] Consolidated appeal and cross-appeal from the County Court for the Fift

POHLMAN, Judge: ¶1 Bloom Master Inc. (Seller) sued Bloom Master LLC (Buyer) for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, claiming that Buyer underpaid on a promissory note. The district court granted summary judgment to Buyer based on a provision of the parties' contract purportedly allowing Buyer to make reduced payments. Seller appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge. In this certiorari proceeding, Attorney James L. Essenson seeks review of a trial court order granting Dorothy B. Bloom's (Dorothy) motion to compel production of Essenson's billing records in connection with his representation of Marshall Bloom *1028(Marshall) in the underlying proceeding relating to the guardians

Bloom v Hilpert (2023 NY Slip Op 01859) Bloom v Hilpert 2023 NY Slip Op 01859 Decided on April 11, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

Filed 7/13/22 (unmodified opn. attached) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT MAURICE BLOOM, Defendant and Appellant. S095223 Los Angeles County Superior Court A801380 ORDER MODIFYING OPI

[Cite as State v. Bloom, 2023-Ohio-2534.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT CRAWFORD COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 3-23-01 v. DIRK BLOOM, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Crawford County Common Pleas Court Trial

[Cite as State v. Bloom, 2022-Ohio-3604.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT CRAWFORD COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 3-22-17 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DIRK BLOOM, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Crawford County Common Pleas Court

18-2390 Bloom v. Azar 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2019 5 6 (Argued: October 7, 2019 Decided: September 23, 2020) 7 8 Docket No. 18-2390-cv 9 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 JONATHAN A. BLOOM, 13 14

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ July 18, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25D0473. CHRISTOPHER FONTES v. QUENCIA BLOOM. In this domestic relations action, Quencia Bloom filed a petition for contempt after Christopher Fontes failed to timely pay child support. The trial court granted the petition on May 16, 2025. Fontes filed a mot

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT MAURICE BLOOM, Defendant and Appellant. S095223 Los Angeles County Superior Court A801380 April 21, 2022 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye a