Cases

Case: 19-1149 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 04/17/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CARDIONET, LLC, BRAEMAR MANUFACTURING, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. INFOBIONIC, INC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1149 ______________________

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority's conclusion that the phrase "traditionally accepted," as used in 30 C.F.R. § 75.333, unambiguously includes Peabody's use of polyurethane foam to seal the perimeters of block stoppings in the Foidel Creek Mine. Instead, I

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-03-257 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) )

ACCEPTED 15-25-00020-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/17/2025 7:29 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: This is a dispute between two companies that prepare law school graduates for a time-honored (and seemingly Sisyphean) rite of legal passage: the bar examination. Each year, thousands of foreign attorneys obtain Master of Laws (“LL.M.”) degrees from American law schools. Since 2009, Plaintiff LLM Bar

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: Defendant Michael Robertson1 moves for judgment as a matter of law, or alternatively a new trial, and for remittitur following a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs.2 Plaintiffs, consisting of record companies (“Labels”) and music publishers (“Publishers”), filed this federal and s

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AVEANNA HEALTHCARE, LLC ) (F/K/A BCPE EAGLE BUYER LLC), ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N20C-08-055 AML CCLD EPIC/FREEDOM, LLC, and ) WEBSTER CAPITAL CORPORATION ) (A/K/A WEBSTER CAPITAL

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 707–798 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT July 1, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) ECC International, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 58993, 60167, 60283 ) Under Contract No. W912DQ-11-C-4009 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: R. Dale Holmes, Esq. Amy M. Kirby, Esq.

629 F.3d 928 (2010) MDY INDUSTRIES, LLC, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and Vivendi Games, Inc., Defendants-third-party-plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Michael Donnelly, Third-party-defendant-Appellant. *929 MDY Industries, LLC, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Vivendi Games, Inc., Defendants-third-party-plaintiffs-A

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AB STABLE VIII LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0310-JTL ) MAPS HOTELS AND RESORTS ONE LLC, MIRAE ) ASSET CAPITAL CO., LTD.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO B, LLC, ) BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO C, LLC, ) BASHO TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO E, LLC, ) HUNOBY ENTERPRISES, LLC, and EARL ) P. GALLEHER, III, individually and ) derivatively on behalf of Basho Technologies, ) Inc., ) ) Plaintiff

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

OPINION AND ORDER Mark S. Davis, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CertusView Technologies, LLC (“Cer-tusView” or “Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant”) filed this patent infringement action alleging that S&N Locating Services, LLC and S&N Communications, Inc.’s (“S&N” or “Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs”) infringed the five Patents-in-Suit. S&N responded by filing an amended answer asserting an inequita

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0177p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NETCHOICE, LLC, │ Plaintiff-Appel

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMPOSECURE, L.L.C., ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12524-VCL ) CARDUX, LLC f/k/a AFFLUENT CARD, LLC, ) ) Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMPOSECURE, L.L.C., ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12524-VCL ) CARDUX, LLC f/k/a AFFLUENT CARD, LLC, ) ) Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ORACLE USA, INC.; ORACLE No. 22-15188 AMERICA, INC.; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00106- Plaintiffs-Appellees, LRH-VCF v. RIMINI STREET, INC., OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal