Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Blake v. Curry Health District”
MICHAEL DITANNA v. BLAKE EDWARDSpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MICHAEL DITANNA, Appellant, v. BLAKE EDWARDS, Appellee. No. 4D20-1619 [June 30, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles E.
Blake Anthony Monakino v. Statepublic domain
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice After appellant, Blake Anthony Mo-nakino, pleaded guilty to the second-degree felony offense of aggravated assault without an agreed punishment recommendation from the State, the trial court assessed his punishment at -six years’ confinement. 1 Althoug
Meadows v. Blakepublic domain
36 So.3d 1225 (2010) Louise MEADOWS and Lavelle Meadows v. Kendall T. BLAKE, M.D., Mississippi Baptist Health Systems, Inc. d/b/a Mississippi Baptist Medical Center. No. 2008-CA-02074-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. June 10, 2010. *1226 Robert V. Greenlee, Ridgeland, Shane F. Langston, Jackson, attorneys for appellants.
Commonwealth v. Blakepublic domain
Marshall, C.J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Botsford, J., joins). I agree that there was sufficient evidence to support the trial judge’s conclusion that the defendant is a sexually dangerous person. I also agree with Justice Ireland’s suggestion that the thirteen-month delay between the close of evidence and the issuance of judgment in this case was “unreasonably long,”
Curry v. Nicholsonpublic domain
ORDER James W. Curry sued the Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, claiming that he was subject to racial discrimination and age-based discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, nee 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-l to 2000e-17; 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. The district court granted the VA’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
Louise Meadows v. Kendall T. Blakepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-CA-02074-SCT LOUISE MEADOWS AND LAVELLE MEADOWS v. KENDALL T. BLAKE, M.D., MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/08/2008 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. W. SWAN YERGER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ROBERT V.
Pearson v. Reynolds School District 7public domain
ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubei issued Findings and Recommendation (# 47) on November 18, 2013, in which he recommends the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion (# 34) for Summary Judgment. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court: (1) grant Defendants’ Motion as to all claims against Defendants Ivan L. Leig
Pounds v. Katy Independent School Districtpublic domain
730 F.Supp.2d 636 (2010) Blake POUNDS, et al., Plaintiff, v. KATY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-06-0527. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. July 30, 2010. *638 Hiram S. Sasser, III, Plano, TX, James Michael Johnson, J. Michael Johnson, Alliance Defense Fund, Shrevepor
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2013 NO. 03-11-00113-CV Kyle L. Janek, M.D., Successor to Thomas Suehs, in his Official Capacity as Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Appellant v. Octavia Gonzalez, Dulce Hernandez, Amalia Guedea-Nelson, Laura Guzman, S.J.M., N.L.T., Laura C
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00113-CV Kyle Janek, M.D., Successor to Thomas Suehs, in his Official Capacity as Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Appellant v. Octavia Gonzalez, Dulce Hernandez, Amalia Guedea-Nelson, Laura Guzman, S.J.M., N.L.T., Laura Campa, Celila C. Blake, Alice Chacon, Jessica Garza, Jesse R.
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: This case is the latest episode in a serial dispute between appellant John Stanton and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (“DCCA”). Having been suspended from the bar under rules that did not automatically restore him on the lapse of his suspensio
Aspen Financial Services, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clarkpublic domain
*638OPINION By the Court, Saitta, J.: Parties facing a civil proceeding and a simultaneous criminal investigation often confront unpleasant choices. They may, for instance, be put to the choice of providing testimony in the civil proceeding that might be used by criminal investigators, or asserting their Fifth Amendment privilege aga
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to decide whether Title IX, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688, creates liability on the part of a public school district that negligently fails to prevent an instructor from sexually abusing a student. We hold that it does not. In order to hold a school district liable under Title IX for teacher-student sexual harassment based on
HSK v. Provident Life & Accident Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge. HSK sues the Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. (“Provident”), alleging failure to pay him disability benefits in breach of an insurance contract. And he sues Provident’s parent corporation, Unum Group (“Unum”), for allegedly interfering with that contract. HSK now moves for summary judgment on his breach of contract claim against Provident,
Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.public domain
HERMAN N. JOHNSON, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *1243This civil action proceeds before the court on Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.'s ("ACH") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 89), Defendant Evanston Insurance Company's ("Evanston") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 91), Evanston's Motion to Strike Exhibits in Support
Tackett v. University of Kansaspublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. Thomas Marten, Chief United States District Judge This is an action against the University of Kansas (“KU”) under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. Before the court is KU’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 25) and plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 28). For the reasons stated below, the court grants
Blakes v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER YOUNG B. KIM, United States Magistrate Judge James Blakes, Steven Clark, Herman Deckys, Bradley Hunt, Phillipe Porter, Ernest Roberts, Jr., Larry Williams, and a class of opt-in plaintiffs (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) brought this action against Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq.,
State of Tennessee v. Jashun Yance Robertsonpublic domain
11/20/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 29, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASHUN YANCE ROBERTSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Fayette County No. 19-CR-141 J. Weber McCraw, Judge ___________________________________
Wolff v. Dunning Motor Salespublic domain
[Cite as Wolff v. Dunning Motor Sales, 2021-Ohio-740.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT KEVIN A. WOLFF : JUDGES: : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellant : Hon. John W. Wise, J.
PHYSICIAN HOSPITALS OF AMERICA v. Sebeliuspublic domain
781 F.Supp.2d 431 (2011) PHYSICIAN HOSPITALS OF AMERICA and Texas Spine & Joint Hospital, Ltd. v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. No. 6:10-cv-277. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. March 31, 2011. *433 Lindsey Scott