Cases

910 N.E.2d 1126 (2009) 232 Ill.2d 577 BLAIR v. JOHNSON. No. 108117. Supreme Court of Illinois. May Term, 2009. Disposition of petition for leave to appeal.[*] Denied. NOTES [*] For Cumulative Leave to Appeal Tables see preliminary pages of advance sheets and Annual Illinois Cumulative Leave to Appeal Table. </

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT RAKIM LAMAR JOHNSON, : No. 97 WM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEA

734 F.2d 13 Blairv.Johnson 84-3298 United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. 4/18/84 S.D.Ohio APPEAL DISMISSED

OPINION FRANKS, Judge. The trial court refused to grant plaintiffs’ Rule 60.02 motion to set aside a final judgment. Plaintiffs sued defendant physician on April 24, 1985, for damages for personal injuries, allegedly due to the professional negligence of the defendant. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on May 24, 1985, which was supplemented by affidavits on June 3,1985. At a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JENNIFER B. COFFMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (R. 7). For reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted. Lori A. Blair worked as a warehouse operator at Johnson & Johnson (“J & J”)’s facility in Fairdale, Kentucky, beginning in Februa

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE EX REL. ERNEST JOHNSON, ) Opinion issued August 31, 2021 ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. SC99176 ) PAUL BLAIR, WARDEN OF POTOSI ) CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ) ) Respondent. )

JOHNSON, J. ¶ 1 In this case we are asked to decide (1) whether a sentencing court may go behind the judgment and sentence and engage in statutory interpretation to determine the facial validity of a prior conviction for current sentencing purposes and (2) whether a snowmobile is a "motor vehicle" for purposes of RCW 9A.56.065. We conclude that the defendant must allege a constitutional defect on the face of a prior conviction to ch

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE EX REL. ERNEST JOHNSON, ) Opinion issued August 31, 2021 ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. SC99176 ) PAUL BLAIR, WARDEN OF POTOSI ) CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ) ) Respondent. )

25 So.3d 1236 (2010) JOHNSON v. LINEBARGER, GOGGAN, BLAIR, SAMPSON, LLP. No. 2D08-3834. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 20, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In 2009, Plaintiffs Blair and Davis, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, filed suit alleging that Defendant TransAm Trucking, Inc. ("TransAm") violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and the Kansas Wage Payment Act ("KWPA"). Plaintiffs bring this action as a collective action under the FLSA for minimum wage violations, and as a Rule 23 class action fo

PER CURIAM Eugene Blair, III sued Faustino Murillo and his employer, Atlantic Industrial, Inc., following an automobile accident in which Blair was injured. Murillo stipulated that he was the sole cause of the- accident; thus, no negligence or causation questions were submitted as to him. The trial court submitted three questions to the jury regarding Atlantic: respondeat superior, negligent entrustment, and proportio

OPINION JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge. Habeas corpus. On December 24, 1969, relator was tried before the Honorable Robert N. C. Nix, Jr., sitting without a jury, on two separate, unrelated cases. Indictment 384 of April Sessions, 1968, charged relator with unlaw*493ful possession of marihuana. Indictments 287 and 288 of February Sessions, 1969,

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.

In re Washington Parish of; Titan Indemnity Company; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 69,873; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2005 CW 0608. Denied. WEIMER, J., recused. JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ. KNOLL, J., would grant the writ.

In re Washington Parish of; Titan Indemnity Company; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 69,873; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2005 CW 0597. Denied. WEIMER, J., recused. JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ. KNOLL, J., would grant the writ.

697 So.2d 912 (1997) D.H. BLAIR & CO., INC., Appellant, v. Howard P. JOHNSON and Iris Johnson, Trustees, and Naftali Feigenbaum, Appellees. Nos. 95-3368, 96-0290. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 23, 1997. Rehearing, Clarification, and Rehearing Denied August 27, 1997. *913 Elliot H.

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Johnson & Johnson ("J&J") and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. ("JJCI")1 (collectively, "Defendants") appeal the trial court's judgment after a jury verdict in favor of Gloria Ristesund ("Ristesund") on her product-liability claims. Ristesund concedes that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendants, and requests th