Cases

23-831 Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ___________________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: November 25, 2025 Amended: December 29, 20

23-831 Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ___________________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: November 25, 2025 Docket No. 23-831-cv

522 F.Supp.2d 1347 (2007) Christine M. BLACKWELL, Plaintiffs, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 06-2301-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 28, 2007. Joan H. Deans, Deans Law Office, Raytown, MO, for Plaintiff. *1348 David D. Zimmerman, Office of United S

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Francisco Garcia brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 1383(c) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. On March 1, 2016, the Commissioner m

MEMORANDUM DECISION FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Pro se plaintiff Denise M. Hairston (“Hairston”) brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §.405(g), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying the application of her minor daughter, S.N.

258 F.Supp.2d 851 (2003) Brenda BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 02 C 1872. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 23, 2003. *853 Marcie Goldbloom, Daley, Debofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Samuel Sanford Miller, Unit

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Hope Kerr (on behalf of her deceased husband Hank W. Kerr) appeals the judgment of a United States Magistrate Judge denying as moot her motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). In April 2015, Kerr sought judicial review of the final decision of the

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0157p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DR. LARRY CUNNINGHAM, │ Plaintiff-Appellee (21-6005),

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: Albert Shaw (claimant or plaintiff) appeals from two judgments of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.), entered on March 21, 1996 (1996 judgment) and on March 27, 1999 (1999 judgment), Shaw v. Apfel, No. CV 97-3820 (E.D.N.Y. March 27, 1999). The 1996 judgment denied claimant mandamus review

USCA11 Case: 21-12314 Document: 131-1 Date Filed: 03/14/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12314 ____________________ NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIAT

954 F.Supp. 944 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dorothy BLACKWELL, a/k/a Dorothy Richardson Blackwell, a/k/a Dorothy Blackwell McNeil, a/k/a Dorothy Richardson and Charles McNeil, Defendants. Criminal No. 95-671 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 21, 1997. *945

85 B.R. 133 (1988) In re Dannell Joe GEORGE, Bernita Mae George, Debtors. In re Clarence LeRoy BRADFORD, Barbara Joyce Bradford, Debtors. In re Laveta Bernice SHOFFNER, Debtor. SECURITY BANK & TRUST CO. OF BLACKWELL, OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. D. Michael CASE, Trustee, Defendant. In re Joseph Carl FEIST, Anna Madgelan Feist, Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 86-11593, 86-12527, 87-10943 and 86-12724, Adv. No. 87-0194

745 F.Supp. 1529 (1989) Jon BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. Richard THORNBURGH, et al., Defendants. No. CV 89-1650-WMB. United States District Court, C.D. California. December 10, 1989. *1530 Carl Shusterman, Barst & Mukamal, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. George H. Wu, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.<

61 F.3d 170 64 USLW 2072, 48 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 450,Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 43,994,Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 44,022 ELIZABETH BLACKWELL HEALTH CENTER FOR WOMEN; GreaterPhiladelphia Women's Medical Fund; CHOICE, on behalf ofthemselves and the Medicaid-eligible women of theCommonwealth of Pennsylvania to whom they provide financial,health care and counseling services, Appellees,v.

472 F.Supp. 333 (1979) Robert LIGHT and Cherry Light v. Lawrence BLACKWELL, J. C. Patterson, George Kell, James A. Branyan, David Solomon, Henry Gray, B. K. Cooper, Don Cahoone and Jim Gee. No. LR-C-76-12. United States District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D. June 1, 1979. *334 Philip E. Kaplan, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs.</

Marshall, J. We are asked once again to decide whether the Division of Medical Assistance (division) has correctly interpreted provisions of Title XIX of the Social Security Act (1965), the Medicaid Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396 et seq., and its implementing Federal and State regulations, in calculating how much an institutionalized Medicaid recipient must contribute to the cost of her long-term care (the “patient paid amount” or PPA).<

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PRINGLE dissenting: I most respectfully dissent. I do not believe that an outworn common law doctrine should be retained in the law of this state in the hope that the legislature will act in that area. Had the legislature acted in whatever way, I would, of course, recognize and adhere to their power in this area. But in the absence of their action in the field, I think it wrong to rely, as I s

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: On a winter day in 1978, four young men working for a company engaged in pruning trees were sent to dump a load of what they thought to be tree branches at a rural landfill. Their arrest on the felony charge of contaminating water supplies, see La. Rev.Stat.Ann. 14:58 (West 1974), because the load they dumped contained garbage,

210 F.3d 703 (6th Cir. 2000) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO; MATTHEW PETERSON, REVEREND,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,V.CAPITOL SQUARE REVIEW AND ADVISORY BOARD; ROBERT TAFT, GOVERNOR OF OHIO; RONALD R. KELLER; DANIEL SHELLENBARGER; RICHARD H. FINAN; J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE; THOMAS M. ZAINO, TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No. 98-4106 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE

*956566 U. S. 974; 566 U. S. 650; 566 U. S. 987; 566 U. S. 988; 566 U. S. 1011; 565 U. S. 1266; 565 U. S. 1268; 566 U. S. 942; 566 U. S. 945; 566 U. S. 946; 566 U. S. 976; 566 U. S. 976;