⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Blackwall Process LLC”

District Court, D. Alaska · 2014-04-16 · Published · cited 2× · 14 F. Supp. 3d 1255; 2014 WL 1515620
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge. This case arises out of circumstances related to the sinking of the tug ARIES in June 2011. The ARIES was owned by Third-Party Defendant C & K Marine LLC (“C & K”) and pulling a barge carrying equipment owned by Ridge Contracting, Inc. and Ridge Equipment, LLC. (Ridge Contracting and Ridge Equipment are together
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-07-05 · Published · cited 15× · 861 F.3d 1278; 2017 A.M.C. 1988; 98 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 299; 2017 WL 2858770; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11957
*1282 MARCUS, Circuit Judge: This in rem admiralty proceeding began in 1979, when Cobb Coin Company retrieved a cannon from wreckage discovered off the coast of Florida. That cannon was part of a shipwreck' dating back to 1715, when eleven Spanish galleons carrying gold, silver, and precious jewels per
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2012-04-12 · Published · cited 6× · 868 F. Supp. 2d 1350; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51398; 2012 WL 1231877
ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon: (I) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on its Affirmative Claims (Dkt. 113), and Defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition (Dkt. 127); (ii) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses (Dkt. 114), and Defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition (Dkt. 127); and; (iii) Defendants’ Motion fo
District Court, W.D. New York · 2011-03-25 · Published · cited 1× · 790 F. Supp. 2d 56; 2011 A.M.C. 645; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31251; 2011 WL 1135656
790 F.Supp.2d 56 (2011) NORTHEAST RESEARCH, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ONE SHIPWRECKED VESSEL, HER TACKLE, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES and CARGO, located within two nautical miles of a circle with the center point at the coordinates 42 degrees 33 minutes North Latitude, and 79 degrees 36 minutes West Longitude, in rem Defendant, State of New York, Claimant. Case No. 04-CV-645A. United States District Court, W
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006-06-09 · Published · cited 3× · 436 F. Supp. 2d 254; 2006 A.M.C. 2786; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42120; 2006 WL 1716850
436 F.Supp.2d 254 (2006) Ralph JOSEPH d/b/a New Bedford Marine Rescue, Plaintiff, v. J.P. YACHTS, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-11173-MBB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 9, 2006. *255 Angela H. Magary, John E. Sutherland, Brickley, Sears & Sorett, P.A., Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. William Hew
California Court of Appeal · 2019-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/22/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR WHYENLEE INDUSTRIES LTD., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN A155008 MATEO COUNTY, (San Mateo County Respondent;
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2019-03-22 · Published · cited 1× · 244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 840; 33 Cal. App. 5th 364
STREETER, J. Whyenlee Industries Ltd. (Whyenlee), a defendant below, petitions for a writ of mandate directing the trial court to grant its motion to quash service of a summons.1 Because plaintiffs used an agent to serve a summons on Whyenlee in Hong Kong *842without first making a request to the Hong Kong governme
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013-10-02 · Published · cited 86× · 731 F.3d 608; 2014 A.M.C. 330; 86 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1308; 2013 WL 5452469; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20105
OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. This appeal is the latest skirmish in the legal battle over the treasures recovered from the of the 19th-century steamship S.S. Central America, a battle that has spanned three decades and numerous courts. Dubbed the “Ship of Gold,” 1 the
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004-07-02 · Published · cited 4× · 323 F. Supp. 2d 724; 2004 A.M.C. 1817; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12555; 2004 WL 1497815
323 F.Supp.2d 724 (2004) R.M.S. TITANIC, INC., successor-in-interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, Its Engines, Tackle Apparel, Appurtenances, Cargo, etc., Located Within One (1) Nautical Mile of a Point Located at 41 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 56' 49" West Longitude, Believed to be the R.M.S. Titanic, in rem, Defendant. No. ACT.NO. 2:93CV902.
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010-07-12 · Published · cited 2× · 724 F. Supp. 2d 721; 2011 A.M.C. 499; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69379; 2010 WL 2740165
724 F.Supp.2d 721 (2010) Gregory L. KIESGEN, Plaintiff, v. ST. CLAIR MARINE SALVAGE, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-13396. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 12, 2010. *722 Armand Velardo, Darwin L. Burke, Peter M. Ruggirello, Ruggirello, Velardo, Novara & Ver Beek, P.C., Mt. Clemens, MI, for P
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010-08-12 · Published · cited 3× · 742 F. Supp. 2d 784; 2010 A.M.C. 1817; 72 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 613; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83737; 2010 WL 3239112
742 F.Supp.2d 784 (2010) R.M.S. TITANIC, INC., successor-in-interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. The WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, Its Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Appurtenances, Cargo, etc., Located Within One (1) Nautical Mile of a Point Located at 41 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 56' 49" West Longitude, Believed to be the R.M.S. Titanic, In Rem, Defendant. No. 2:93cv902. Uni