Cases

963 A.2d 746 (2009) ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BLACKSTONE CAPITAL PARTNERS V L.P. and Aladdin Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Aladdin Holdco, Inc., Defendants. C.A. No. 3796-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: October 17, 2008. Decided: January 15, 2009. *748 Joel Friedlander, Esquire, Evan

634 F.3d 706 (2011) Martin LITWIN, Max Poulter, Francis Brady, and Landmen Partners, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BLACKSTONE GROUP, L.P., Stephen A. Schwarzman, Michael A. Puglisi, Peter J. Peterson, and Hamilton E. James, Defendants-Appellees.[*] Docket No. 09-4426-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

659 F.Supp.2d 532 (2009) LANDMEN PARTNERS INC., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. The BLACKSTONE GROUP, L.P., et al., Defendants. No. 08-CV-3601 (HB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 22, 2009. *535 David Avi Rosenfeld, Samuel Howard Rudman, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudm

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

09-4426-cv Landmen Partners, Inc. v. The Blackstone Group, L.P. 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 _______________________________ 5 6 August Term, 2010 7 8 (Argued: August 25, 2010 Decided: February 10, 2011) 9 10

625 F.Supp.2d 82 (2009) Andrew LUM, Plaintiff, v. DISCOVERY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and DGF Services, LLC, Defendants. Civil No. 3:08cv1806 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 15, 2009. *83 Daniel J. Kaiser, Kaiser, Saurborn & Mair, New York, NY, Melinda A. Powell, Robin B. Kallor, Rose Kallor LLP, Hart-

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge. Count One of the Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amended Complaint sets forth an allegation of an overarching conspiracy on the part of the Defendants, who are private equity firms, “to allocate the market for and artificially fix, maintain, or stabilize prices of securities in club LB Os in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.” Plaintiffs are

Office of the Director New Mexico 07:57:16 2022.06.13 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2022-NMCA-026 Filing Date: June 9, 2020 No. A-1-CA-36925 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. FRANK C. FOY, JOHN CASEY, and SUZANNE FOY, Qui Tam Plaintiffs-Appellants, v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER EDWARD F. HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on thirteen motions for summary judgment. The motions consist of one omnibus motion for summary judgment as to Count One of the Fifth Amended Complaint filed jointly by the Defendants, one motion for sum*123mary judgment as to Count Two filed by the De

SALTER, J. Coastwide Services, LLC (“Coastwide”), defendant and mortgagor in a circuit court foreclosure action, appeals orders denying its right to exercise its statutory right of redemption (section 45.0315, Florida Statutes (2016)). 1 The mortgagée and plaintiff below, Carolyn Goldberg, and Best Investment, LLC (“Bes

LOUIS L. STANTON, District Judge: The named defendants and nominal defendant move to dismiss the plaintiffs' verified consolidated stockholder derivative complaint for violation of securities law, breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment (Dkt. No. 105) on the ground that the plaintiffs lack standing to assert claims derivatively1 on behalf of Resource Capital.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MERION CAPITAL L.P. and MERION ) CAPITAL II L.P., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9320-VCL ) LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

OPINION1 Re D.I. Nos. 22, 43, 45, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 & 173 KEVIN GROSS, Bankruptcy Judge. Defendants CapitalSource Finance, LLC (“CapSource”), Seaport Capital, LLC and its affiliated defendants (collectively, “Seaport”), James Collis, Robert Tamashunas, Andrew Meyers, On Target Media Holdings, Inc. (“OTMH”), Innovation Ads, Inc. (“Innovation”), Michael

910 A.2d 1020 (2006) ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, Plaintiff, v. GC-SUN HOLDINGS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, GC-Sun G.P., Inc., a Delaware corporation; GC-Sun Holdings II, L.P., a Delaware limited Partnership; GC-Sun G.P. II, Inc., a Delaware corporation; GC-Sun Frontier Investors, LLC, f/k/a/ Brafasco Investors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Brafasco Holdings II, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Glencoe

Feinberg v Marathon Patent Group Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 02452) Feinberg v Marathon Patent Group Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 02452 Decided on April 22, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Re

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Plaintiff Bettina M. Whyte, acting in her capacity as the trustee of the SemGroup Litigation Trust (the “Trustee”), brings the above-captioned case seeking to avoid certain transactions between several Sem-Group entities1 and defendants Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays Capital, Inc. (collectively, “Barclays”). On August

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Various purchasers of securities issued by JinkoSolar Holdings Co., Ltd. in two public offerings appeal from Judge Oetken’s dismissal of their complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws. We hold that appellees’ failure to disclose ongoing, serious pollution problems rendered misleading statements in a prospectus describing prophylactic meas

*1162THOMAS, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority that Mann is not entitled to relief on his claims of guilt-phase ineffective assistance of counsel. I respectfully disagree that he is not entitled to relief on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Th

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Bryce T. ROAN, Senior Airman United States Air Force, Appellant No. 24-0104 Crim. App. No. 22033 Argued February 26, 2025—Decided September 15, 2025

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 48839-2021 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, September 2022 Term ) v. ) Opinion filed: November 9, 2023