Cases

VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. On April 19, 2019, U.S. Bank, National Association ("U.S. Bank") brought this mortgage foreclosure action against East Fordham DE LLC ("Fordham") and others in connection with a large parcel of commercial real estate in the Bronx, New York (the "Property"). (See "Complaint," Dkt. No. 1.) Since 2014, the parties have been engaged in litigation (the "State Court Action") over the

Gants, J. Early in 1997, Thermedics Detection, Inc. (“Thermedics”) retained the defendants — the Simmons Agency, Inc. and its principals, Jonathan and Robert Simmons (collectively, “Simmons”) — as private investigators to learn whether the plaintiff, John Fordham (“Fordham”), was the source of information they believed to be defamatory. During the course of its private investigation, Simmons removed Fordham’s garbage from the tr

56 F.Supp.2d 330 (1999) Horace DOVE, Plaintiff, v. FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, The City of New York, et al., Defendants. No. 98 Civ. 7118(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 14, 1999. *331 *332 *333 Horace Dove, New York City, plaintiff pro se.<

417 Mass. 10 (1994) 627 N.E.2d 901 COMMONWEALTH vs. JOHN R. FORDHAM. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. November 4, 1993. February 8, 1994. Present: LIACOS, C.J., NOLAN, LYNCH, O'CONNOR, & GREANEY, JJ. Kevin S. Nixon for the defendant. Elspeth B. Cypher, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commo

5 F.Supp.2d 188 (1998) Harry DE LA CONCHA, Plaintiff, v. FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. 96 CIV. 2385(CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 11, 1998. *189 Winstone A. Maynard, New York City, for Plaintiff. Putney Twombly Hall & Hirson, James B. McGrath III, New York City, for Defendant.

Borenstein, Isaac, J. I. INTRODUCTION Black Rock Capital, LLC (“Black Rock”), a commercial finance company, brought this action pursuant to G.L.c. 251, §2(b), against Attorney Richard W. Gannett (“Attorney Gannett”), its former attorney, in order to stay arbitration proceedings that Attorney Gannett initiated with respect to fee disputes related to his representation of Black Rock. Black Rock alleges that

340 S.E.2d 111 (1986) Marc Anthony TORAIN, Juliet V. Torain, David W. Torain, Jr., and Charles Torain, Children of David William Torain (deceased employee), Plaintiffs, v. FORDHAM DRUG COMPANY, INC., Employer, Home Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants. No. 8510IC657. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 4, 1986. *113 A

521 F.Supp. 1059 (1981) Professor Juan E. HERNANDEZ-CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, etc., et al., Defendants. 79 Civ. 4122 (JEL). United States District Court, S. D. New York. June 17, 1981. Thomas I. Atkins, Charles E. Carter, James I. Meyerson, New York City, for plaintiff. Rogers & Wells, New York City, for defendants by Joseph H. Spain, Margar

A careful study of the entire record now before this Court fails to convince us that the learned Chancellor abused his sound judicial discretion in denying specific performance and dismissing the plaintiffs' amended bill of complaint. The final decree from which this appeal was prosecuted should be and it is hereby affirmed. Affirmed. ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

876 F.Supp. 1270 (1995) James C. ORR, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. BLACK & FURCI, P.A., Roy Black, Defendants. No. 93-642-CIV-ORL-18. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 3, 1995. *1271 *1272 Kevin F. Foley, Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., Orlando, FL, for p

The appellant brought suit against Horace A. Fordham and Lynn Council, individually, and A A Used Cars, a partnership composed of Fordham and Council, to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The theory of the suit was that the injury was inflicted by the defendants through their agent, James R. Carter, while acting within the line and scope of his authority. The evidence showed that the Mercury automobile which collided with appellant's car in Shelby County on Apr

492 F.Supp. 848 (1980) Erica M. BLACK et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al., Defendants. No. 77-0420-CV-W-1-3. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D. June 19, 1980. *849 *850 *851 *852 Arthur A. Be

The decree directed that preliminary injunctive restraints be vacated; that complainant pay to defendants Flanigan and Cogan, who are counselors-at-law of this state, the sum of *Page 249 $2,000 with interest and costs, and an additional counsel fee of $800, and that the bill be dismissed with costs to the Fordham National Bank. This, of course, was a final disposition of the cause, although, as will be seen, there was nothing in the nature of a final hea

ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge: In this case plaintiffs Chester and Frances Robinson (the Robinsons) appeal from a judgment of the district court that barred their suit on res judicata grounds. The Robinsons and their attorneys, David Black and Roy Ewart, also appeal the sanctions imposed upon them by the district court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Wardlaw, Ch. John Stocks Thorne, by his last will and testament, executed August 11, 1824, appointed Richard Eordham executor of his will, and after a specific devise disposed of his estate as follows : “ All the rest of all my real and personal estate I give unto Richard Eordham, to be held in trust by him for John, Thomas, Philip, Rebecca, Caroline and Susan

504 F.Supp.2d 1333 (2007) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc., Bertha B. Young, and Eugene Taylor, Plaintif

Smith, J. (concurring in People v Guardino, People v Hollis and People v Black, and dissenting in People v Hecker). I join the majority opinion in all these cases except People v Hecker, in which I dissent. Before discussing Hecker, however, I want to add a word about People v Guardino. I In Guardino <

People ex rel. Tse v Barometre (2020 NY Slip Op 06280) People ex rel. Tse v Barometre 2020 NY Slip Op 06280 Decided on November 4, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

Vargas v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 00370) Vargas v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 00370 Decided on January 22, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TIMORIA LLC, a Delaware company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2025-0883-JTL ) CHAIB ANIS, MOHAMMED ALHABIB ) ALWASLATI, individuals, and JOHN ) DOE Nos. 1 through 10, unknown parties,