Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bishop v. Kinney”
Kinney v. Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, Inc.public domain
WALLER, Chief Justice, for the court: ¶ 1. Frank Schmidt Sr. and other former parishioners of the St. Paul Catholic Church in Pass Christian (“Plaintiffs”) seek review of the second dismissal with prejudice of their claims against the Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, Inc., Most Reverend Thomas J. Rodi (“Bishop Rodi”), and Rev. Dennis Carver (“Church Defendants”). This is the second appearance of these parties before this Court.
Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese v. Kinneypublic domain
Per Curiam. R.C. 5709.07 exempts from taxation “* * * houses used exclusively for public worship * * *.” R.C. 5713.04, known as the “split-listing statute,” provides, in pertinent part: “If a separate parcel of improved or unimproved real property has a single ownership and is so used so that part thereof, if a separate entity, would be exempt from taxation, and the balance thereof would not be exe
Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Bishop (In Re Bishop)public domain
276 B.R. 737 (2002) In re Lewis Charles BISHOP, Jr., Debtor. Airlines Reporting Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Lewis Charles Bishop, Jr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 7-00-00479. Adversary No. 7-00-00137. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. March 6, 2001. *738 Harry Wayne Brown, Roanoke, VA, for Debtor.<
Harold Pollock Co., L.P.A. v. Bishoppublic domain
[Cite as Harold Pollock Co., L.P.A. v. Bishop, 2014-Ohio-1132.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) HAROLD POLLOCK CO., LPA C.A. No. 12CA010233 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
United States v. Bishoppublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Bishop No. 02-5176 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0264P (6th Cir.) File Name: 03a0264p.06 Nikki C. Pierce, FEDERAL DEFENDER SERVICES, Greeneville, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Guy W.
Bishop v. City of Clearwaterpublic domain
LILES, Acting Chief Judge. The Clearwater Police Department received information from the Sheriff’s Crime Bulletin that the State of Ohio was seeking a person known as Helen Walker for fraud. The suspect was described as an Ohio resident who had lived in Missouri; drove a white Cadillac; was 5 feet 7 inches tall; weighed 130 pounds and had a dark complexion. The Clearwater Police then discovered that it had previously arrest
United States v. Wesley Dale Bishoppublic domain
OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. United States of America appeals the district court’s grant of Wesley Bishop’s motion to suppress a handgun seized by a deputy sheriff from an unattended automobile parked on private property. The gun provides the basis for a felon in possession charge. We REVERSE the decision of the.district court for the following reason
Carter v. Bishoppublic domain
209 Ga. 919 (1953) 76 S.E.2d 784 CARTER et al. v. BISHOP, by next friend. 18186. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued May 11, 1953. Decided June 10, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 15, 1953. Pittman, Hodge & Kinney and R. Carter Pittman, for plaintiff in error. Mitchell & Mitchell,
Carter v. Bishoppublic domain
Carlisle, J. This court in a judgment entered in this case (Carter v. Bishop, 87 Ga. App. 554, 74 S. E. 2d 562) affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Whitfield County; and the Supreme Court on certiorari having reversed the judgment of this court (Carter v. Bishop, 209 Ga. 919, 76 S. E. 2d 784), the judgment of affirmance originally rendered by this court is vacated,
Carter v. Bishoppublic domain
87 Ga. App. 554 (1953) 74 S.E.2d 562 CARTER et al. v. BISHOP, by next friend. 34182. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided January 13, 1953. Rehearing Denied February 12, 1953. *558 Pittman, Hodge & Kinney, for plaintiff in error. Keener & Keener, Mitchell & Mit
Carter v. Bishoppublic domain
209 Ga. 146 (1952) 71 S.E.2d 216 CARTER et al. v. BISHOP, by next friend. 17869. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued May 12, 1952. Decided June 9, 1952. Pittman, Hodge & Kinney and R. Carter Pittman, for plaintiffs in error. Mitchell & Mitchell and Keener & Keener, contra. DU
Bishop v. Port Authoritypublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff Trans World Airlines, Inc., appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated March 28, 1989, as, after a ruling denying its application for leave to amend its third-party complaint, dismissed its cause of action *566for contractual indemnification against the third
Moraine Heights Baptist Church v. Kinneypublic domain
Per Curiam. The issue before this court is whether appellant’s entire church camp qualifies for a tax exemption within the purview of R.C. 5709.07. R.C. 5709.07 provides, in pertinent part: “* * * [H]ouses used exclusively for public worship, the books and furniture therein, and the ground attached to such buildings necessary for the proper occupancy, use, and enjoyment thereof,
Summit United Methodist Church v. Kinneypublic domain
J. P. Celebrezze, J., dissenting. I believe the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals should be reversed as unreasonable and unlawful as it was unsubstantiated by the record. Therefore, I respectfully dissent. R.C. 5709.07 states in pertinent part: “* * * [H]ouses used exclusively for public worship, the books and furniture therein, and the ground attached to such buildings necessary for the prope
In this case Beth Hamidrosh Hagodol Ohave Emuna Anshe *Page 90 Grodna, an orthodox Jewish congregation (appellant), appeals the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") denying it a refund of taxes paid for tax year 1979. For the reasons adduced below, the decision is affirmed. I In August 1978, the appellant entered into an agreement with the University Heights Masonic Lodge for the purchase
Kinney v. Dexterpublic domain
ORTON, J. This is an action in ejectment to recover the possession of a narrow strip of land on the west side of lot 1, block 1, in Tripp’s addition to the village of Whitewater. Both parties claim title from the same source, viz., from one Byron Brown. The plaintiff proved title by successive deeds after the deed of the strip by Byron Brown to his wife, Amelia T. Brown, dated November 25, 1869. The consideration mentioned in the
Riordan v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saintspublic domain
242 F.Supp.2d 635 (2003) Lamoni K. RIORDAN, Plaintiff, v. CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS d/b/a Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Defendant. No. 02-0296-CV-2-ODS. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. January 16, 2003. *637 Victor A. Bergma
Leverett v. Bishop Furniture Co.public domain
451 F.Supp. 289 (1978) Elizabeth LEVERETT a/k/a Marjorie Huckabee, Plaintiff, v. BISHOP FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. M-5-121. United States District Court, D. of South Carolina, Spartanburg Division. May 17, 1978. *290 Alan Rosenblum, Staff Atty., Piedmont Legal Services, Inc., Spartanburg, S. C., for plaintiff
Catholic Bishop v. Village of Justicepublic domain
Mr. JUSTICE WILSON delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment and an injunction enjoining defendant village of Justice from enforcing a village ordinance. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court held that the fee provisions and territorial restriction provisions of the ordinance were invalid. The court enjoin
Lehne v. Bishoppublic domain
Armstrong, C. J. Plaintiffs, Reinhold Lehne and Ros-swell Kinney, appeal from a dismissal of their garnishment action against defendant insurance company. Plaintiffs had secured a judgment against defendant Raymond John Bishop for property damage and personal injuries caused by a collision of defendant’s 1957 Ford with an automobile owned and driven by plaintiff Kinney on November 12, *2</