Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Billy Ramey”
Billy Spain v. H&H Investors, L.L.C.public domain
BILLY SPAIN * NO. 2023-C-0491 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL H&H INVESTORS, L.L.C., ET * AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* ON SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE CI
In Re: Billy Williams, Movantpublic domain
Motion denied by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge MOTZ joined. OPINION WILLIAM W. WILKINS, Chief Judge: Billy Williams moves for authorization to file a successive habeas corpus application pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2003). See
Consol. Ins. Co. v. Slonepublic domain
BRIEFS FOR APPELLANT: Charles H. Cassis, Aaron J. Silletto, Chadler M. Hardin, Prospect, Kentucky. ORAL ARGUMENT FOR APPELLANT: Charles H. Cassis, Chadler M. Hardin, Prospect, Kentucky. BRIEF FOR APPELLEES: CHRISTOPHER LEE SLONE; JESSICA CANTRELL; NANCY PERKINS, AS MOTHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN, AND NEXT FRIEND OF RAYMOND MITCHELL KEETON, AN INFANT; RAMONA CONLEY, AS MOTHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN, AND NEXT FRIEND OF SAMANTHA CONLEY, AN
Brookshire Bros., Inc. v. Lewispublic domain
911 S.W.2d 791 (1995) BROOKSHIRE BROTHERS, INC., Appellant, v. Billy Ben LEWIS, Appellee. No. 12-93-00320-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. October 31, 1995. Rehearing Overruled December 29, 1995. *793 Steve Roper, Scott C. Skelton, Lufkin, for appellant. Sid S. Stover, Jasper, for appellee. RAM
Prowse v. Walterspublic domain
941 S.W.2d 223 (1996) Mary Jane PROWSE, Appellant, v. Robert W. WALTERS, et al., Appellees. No. 13-94-368-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. November 21, 1996. Rehearing Overruled January 9, 1997. *224 Robert L. Ramey, Corpus Christi, for appellant. Billy H. Davis, Jr., Waco, for appellee.
Eubanks ex rel. Ramey v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.public domain
REID, Judge. This matter is before this Court on an appeal from summary judgments in favor of defendants International Harvester Company, Baltimore Contractors, Inc., and New Amsterdam Casualty Company. This is an action brought by the plaintiff Billie Kathryn Eubanks for the use and benefit of her minor daughter, Marilyn Kay Ramey for damages resulting from the death of the minor’s father Jeptha Franklin
Stokes v. Statepublic domain
Following a four-month jury trial, Appellant Billy Wayne Stokes was convicted on May 19, 1988, of the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and sentenced to 15 years' confinement. On appeal, Appellant raises four points of error. We affirm the conviction. By his first point of error, Appellant alleges that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for directed verdict. We will construe this point as a challenge to the
Haynden v. American Honda Motor Co.public domain
OPINION ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING RAMEY, Chief Justice. By opinion delivered by this Court on April 27, 1992, the order of dismissal of the trial court was reversed, and the cause remanded for proper disposition. Pervading Appellee’s rehearing motion is their interpretation of our opinion that it somehow affected the foreclosure of two specific tracts of property, which foreclosure was approved i
Pako Corp. v. Thomaspublic domain
855 S.W.2d 215 (1993) PAKO CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Billy THOMAS and Anna Baker, Jointly and Severally, and d/b/a Foto Factory, Appellee. No. 12-90-00227-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. May 28, 1993. *216 Cynthia Keely Timms, Dallas, for appellant. H.L. McGee, Tyler, for appellee. RAMEY, Chief Justice. <
McFarland v. Sanderspublic domain
932 S.W.2d 640 (1996) Weldon McFARLAND and Richard W. McFarland, Jr., Appellants, v. Billy SANDERS d/b/a Sanders Construction Company, Appellee. No. 12-93-00280-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. June 27, 1996. *642 Weldon McFarland, Tyler, for appellants. Gregory P. Grajczyk, Longview, for appellee. Before RAMEY
Grimmett v. Higginbothampublic domain
RAMEY, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from a bench trial judgment in which the court found that a partnership relationship existed between the plaintiff, Billy Don Higginbotham (“Higginbotham”) and the defendant, Rodney Earl Grimmett (Grimmett”) in the ownership of a Nacogdoches air conditioning firm, REG Enterprises (“REG”).1 The trial court adjusted the partnership property and accounts and awa
Hayden v. American Honda Motor Co.public domain
This is an appeal from the trial court's dismissal of the application under the TEXAS PROPERTY CODE of Appellants, Billy Gunter Hayden and wife, Annie Louise Hayden, to discharge and cancel a pre-bankruptcy judgment and lien in favor of American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Appellee. TEX.PROP.CODE ANN. Secs.52.021-.024 (Vernon 1984). We will reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for further disposition; Appellee's counterpoint will be
Ellis v. First City National Bankpublic domain
864 S.W.2d 555 (1993) Billy V. ELLIS & Nancy Ellis, Appellants, v. FIRST CITY NATIONAL BANK, Trustee, et al., Appellees. No. 12-91-00287-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. July 26, 1993. Rehearing Denied October 13, 1993. *556 Weldon McFarland, Deborah Race, Tyler, for appellant. A.D. Henderson, Jam
LOUGHRY, Chief Justice: The ERP Environmental Fund, Inc. (“ERP”) seeks a writ of prohibition in connection with the February 25, 2016, order of the Circuit Court of Wyoming County compelling the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) to direct Eastern Associated Coal, LLC (“Eastern”)
Gerver v. Benavidespublic domain
530 S.E.2d 701 (1999) 207 W.Va. 228 Kent A. GERVER and Billie Jo Gerver, Plaintiffs below, Appellants, v. Aurelio BENAVIDES, M.D., Defendant below, Appellee. No. 26355. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted October 5, 1999. Decided December 13, 1999. Dissenting Opinion of Justice Maynard December 16, 1999.
Wood County v. Riverspublic domain
HADDEN, Justice. This is an appeal of a trial court’s interlocutory order denying a motion for summary judgment, in which Wood County, its Sheriff, Bill Skinner, and its Deputy Sheriff, Billy Blunt, asserted qualified immunity as an affirmative defense to the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim filed by Appellees.1 In one issue, Appellants assert that the denial was error. For the reasons stated below, we dis
Wray v. Lendermanpublic domain
This is an action to terminate the parent-child relationship between the natural father Billy T. Wray, Jr., appellant, and his minor son, Christopher Wray. The suit was *Page 70 filed by the natural mother, Marguerite Wray Lenderman, and stepfather, James Lenderman, appellees. A judgment of termination was entered based upon a jury verdict which found that appellant had engaged in conduct which endangered the physical or emotional well-being of th
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Graggpublic domain
43 S.W.3d 609 (2001) TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT, Appellant, v. Billy Harden GRAGG, et al., Appellees. No. 10-98-244-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. March 21, 2001. *612 Marc O. Knisely, Shannon H. Ratliff, McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, L.L.P., Austin, George F. Christie, Hal R. Ray, Jr., Pope, Hardwicke, Christi, H
McCormick v. Walmart Stores, Inc.public domain
600 S.E.2d 576 (2004) 215 W.Va. 679 Mindy and Billy McCORMICK, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, and David CARROLL, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. WALMART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation; RCDI Construction, Inc., a West Virginia corporation; West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, an agency of the state government of the State of West Virginia; and the Town of Lewisburg, West Virginia, a muni
Swiger v. UGI/Amerigas, Inc.public domain
613 S.E.2d 904 (2005) 216 W.Va. 756 Samuel J. SWIGER, and Brenda Frazier Swiger, Individually, and as Next Friend of Joseph Shawn Swiger, an Infant, and all Individuals as Representatives of a Class of other Similarly Situated Individuals, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. UGI/AMERIGAS, INC., a Foreign Corporation, DBA Amerigas, Inc., and James Walters, an Individual, Defendants Below, Appellants. No. 3