Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bill Scott and Linda Scott”
Opinion issued February 25, 2025. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00597-CV ——————————— RICHARD LUNA, Appellant V. DOUGLAS SCOTT TYLER, MD AND LINDA G. PHILLI
Scott v. 797 Quincy St, LLCpublic domain
Scott v 797 Quincy St, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 02362) Scott v 797 Quincy St, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 02362 Decided on April 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
George Scott v. Linda Scottpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 6, 2000 Session GEORGE DAVID SCOTT v. LINDA TRIBBLE SCOTT Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 95D-824 Muriel Robinson, Judge No. M1999-00322-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 20, 2001 This appeal involves a post-divorce dispute over child support. Fifteen mon
Harriman, Timothy Scottpublic domain
6S3-fS Cause No. ORIGINAL IN THE CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS TIMOTHY HARRIMAN, Appellant, „ RECEIVED SW COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Vs. MAY 29 2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS,
STATE OF FLORIDA v. ANDREW SCOTT CROSEpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. ANDREW SCOTT CROSE, Appellee. No. 2D21-2784 January 26, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Donna Padar, Judge. Ashley Moody, Attorn
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2447 LINDA THOMPSON, individually and on behalf of others simi- larly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ A
Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion)public domain
Pfeifer, J., concurring. {¶ 42} I concur in the majority opinion. I write separately because something about the case doesn’t seem right. {¶ 43} There was great angst in the air. Payday lending was a scourge. It had to be eliminated or at least controlled. So the General Assembly enacted a bill, the Short-Term Lender Act (“STLA”), R.C. 1321
Landry v. City of Scottpublic domain
40 So.3d 428 (2010) David LANDRY v. CITY OF SCOTT. No. 10-47. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. June 2, 2010. *429 Christopher Richard Philipp, Attorney at Law, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, City of Scott. James Michael Stefanski, Edwards, Stefanski, et al., Crowley, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, David L
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: A jury found Defendants-Appellants William T. Scott (“Mr. Scott”), Linda D. Scott (“Mrs. Scott”), and Ralph Ben-Schoter (“Ben-Schoter”) guilty of one count- of conspiracy (18 U.S.C.A. § 371), three counts of transferring false obligations of the United States (18 U.S.C.A. § 473), one count of bank fraud (18 U.S.C.A. § 1344), two counts of wire fraud (18 U.S.
Presidio Independent School District v. Scottpublic domain
309 S.W.3d 927 (2010) PRESIDIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. Robert SCOTT, as Commissioner of Education, Respondent. No. 08-0958. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued January 19, 2010. Decided April 23, 2010. *928 Larry A. Baskind, Linda Aileen Samples, Baskind & Hosford, PC, Ken Slavin, Kemp Smith, L
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI, EX REL., ) JEFF PETERS & JOHN NEWMAN, ) WD85719 consolidated with ) WD85777 Appellant-Respondents, ) v. ) OPINION FILED: ) SCOTT FITZPATRICK, ) August 29, 2023 TREASURER, STATE OF ) MISSOURI AND COLLEEN JOERN ) VETTER, DIRECTOR OF THE ) MISSOURI
WIGGINS, Justice. In this appeal, a plaintiff asks our court to decide if the district court properly granted summary judgment and partial summary judgment on his defamation claim based on the running of the statute of limitations. Additionally, we must determine if the court properly granted summary judgment on the' plaintiffs malicious prosecution claim
Scott v. City of Pittsburghpublic domain
903 A.2d 110 (2006) Gene SCOTT, Appellant v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH and University of Pittsburgh. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs March 10, 2006. Decided July 19, 2006. *111 Joseph J. Chester, Pittsburgh, for appellant. George R. Specter, Pittsburgh, for appellee, City of Pittsburgh. BEFORE: McGI
ACCEPTED 05-17-01187-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 6/1/2018 9:53 PM
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00053-COA TINA FRANCO AND RODDY A. VANACOR APPELLANTS v. LINDA A. FERRILL AND CHARLES A. APPELLEES FERRILL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARGARET ALFONSO COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HANCOCK COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR AP
Hamilton National Title, LLC v. Linda Rothrock Juruspublic domain
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana FILED Jul 03 2025, 9:27 am Hamilton National Title LLC, CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Appellant-Defendant
Linda Reynolds v. West Virginia Division of Highwayspublic domain
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED LINDA REYNOLDS, Claimant Below, Petitioner February 15, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS vs.) No. 22-ICA-199 (BOR Appea
People v. Hardy; People v. Glennpublic domain
McCormack, J. (concurring). I join Justice Vmano’s opinion in full because I believe that it goes as far as it can to provide the best possible guidance for trial courts charged with applying the statutory language at issue in this case. I write separately to encourage the Legislature to amend MCL 777.37, offense variable (OV) 7, to define, or more clearly articulate its intent
State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey Scottpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 14, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEFFREY SCOTT Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 07-07601 James M. Lammey, Jr., Judge No. W2009-00707-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 14, 2011 A Shelby County jury convicted the defendant, Jeffrey Scott, of second degree murder. The t
Brinson Benefits, Inc. v. Linda Hooper, Sean Sendelbach and Holmes Murphy & Associates, Inc.public domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice Schenck Appellant Brinson Benefits, Inc. (“Brin-son”) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding appellees Linda Hooper (“Ms. Hooper”), Sean Sendelbach (“Mr. Sendelbach”), and Holmes Murphy & Associates, Inc. (“HMA”) attorney’s fees pursuant to the Texas Theft Liability Act (“TTLA”) in its suit against