Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Big Country Mobile Fleet Services, LLC”
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-998C Filed: May 22, 2019 Reissued: June 11, 20191 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MLS-MULTINATIONAL LOGISTIC * SERVICES, LTD, * Pre-Award Bid Protest; Motion to * Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Protestor,
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Assist Consultants Inc.public domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Assist Consultants Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 61525, 62090 ) Under Contract No. W912ER-18-C-0009 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas L. Patin, Esq. Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Wa
BRISCOE, Chief Judge. In late 2011, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) issued a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Order) comprehensively reforming and modernizing its universal service and intercarrier compensation systems. Petitioners, each of whom were parties to the FCC’s rule-making proceeding below, filed petitions for judicial review of the FCC’s Order. The Judicial Pa
ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC v. PCS Nitrogen, Inc.public domain
791 F.Supp.2d 431 (2011) ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PCS NITROGEN, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Ross Development Corporation; J. Holcombe Enterprises, L.P.; James H. Holcombe; J. Henry Fair, Jr.; Allwaste Tank Cleaning, Inc. n/k/a PSC Container Services, LLC; Robin Hood Container Express, Inc.; City of Charleston, South Carolina, Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-2782-MBS.<
Wilkins v. AmeriCorp Inc. (In re Allegro Law LLC)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION William R. Sawyer, United States Bankruptcy Judge This Adversary Proceeding was called for trial on November 4, 2013. Plaintiff Daniel G. Hamm1 was present in person and by counsel Steve Olen and Lucy Tufts. Neither the Defendants nor their counsel, Thomas McAlpine, appeared. For the reasons set forth below, the Court enters judgment by default i
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
Black Warrior Electric Membership Corp. v. McCarterpublic domain
WOODALL, Justice. Black Warrior Electric Membership Corporation (“Black Warrior”) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Ronald McCarter in McCarter’s action seeking compensation for injuries he sustained when he contacted a power line owned and operated by Black Warrior. We reverse and remand. I. Factual and Procedural Background This case arose out of an acc
Reed v. Beverly Hills Porschepublic domain
NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This diversity case is before the Court on the question of personal jurisdiction over Defendant Beverly Hills Porsche (Beverly Hills).1 Plaintiff Eugene Reed alleges claims of breach of contract, violation of Virginia's Consumer Protection Act, and fraud stemming from his purchase of a Porsche from Beverly Hills. Plaintiff initially contacted Beverly Hi
Whyte Monkee Productions v. Netflixpublic domain
Appellate Case: 22-6086 Document: 213-1 Date Filed: 04/30/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 30, 2026
In Re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE DOMESTIC AIRLINE TRAVEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL Docket No. 2656 Misc. No. 15-1404 (CKK) Redacted Public Version This Document Relates To: ALL CASES MEMORANDUM OPINION
Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.public domain
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 19, 2025 Decided September 2, 2025 No. 25-5122 CLIMATE UNITED FUND, ET AL., APPELLEES v. CITIBANK, N.A., APPELLANT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND LEE M. ZELDIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, APPE
DUNSTON, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 19, 2017) Pending before the Court are Defendants TK Holdings, Inc.’s and Takata Corporation’s Motions to Dismiss the Complaint, or in the Alternative, for a Stay. Defendants’ motions will be denied in part because the Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants under the Virgin Islands long-arm statute and the Complaint states a claim f
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: *265In September 2017, the Court held a bench trial between two Alzheimer's charities-Counterclaim Plaintiff Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (hereafter, "Alzheimer's Association" or the "Association" or "Counterclaim Plaintiff") and Counterclaim Defendant Alzheimer's Foundation of America
Baylson, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...570 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND...570 A. Initial Proposed CIR Advertisement...570 B. SEPTA's Rejection of the Proposed Ad...573 C. Revised Advertisement and Second Rejection...574 III. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND...574 IV. EVIDENCE...575
Sierra Club v. Donald Trumppublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION OCT 9 2020 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SIERRA CLUB; SOUTHERN BORDER No. 19-17501 COM
SMITH, Circuit Judge. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in its own name against CRST Van Expedited, Inc. (CRST), alleging that CRST subjected Mo-nika Starke “and approximately 270 similarly situated female employees” to a hostile work environment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Starke and Remcey Jeunenne Peeples interve
Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineerspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge The Sierra Club and the National Wildlife Federation (“Plaintiffs”) have brought this action for a declaratory judgment against several federal agencies and their executive officers in their official capacity (the “Federal Agencies”) regarding construction of the Flanagan South
(2008) Luis Alfredo SANTIAGO-SEPÙLVEDA, et al., Plaintiffs v. ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY (PUERTO RICO), INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. 08-1950 (CCC), 08-1986(CCC), 08-2025(CCC), 08-2032(CCC), 08-2044(CCC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 18, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
Eig Energy Fund Xiv, L.P. v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.Apublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) EIG ENERGY FUND XIV, L.P., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 1:16-cv-00333 (APM) ) PETRÓLEO BRASILEIR