Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Big Brunos Bites LLC”
United States v. Fargas-Reyespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1502 23-1503 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JONATHAN KEMUEL FARGAS-REYES, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
Fontenot v. Wal-Martpublic domain
5 So.3d 298 (2009) Joseph H. FONTENOT, Jr. v. WAL-MART. No. 08-158. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 4, 2009. *299 Frank A. Flynn, Desiree C. Williams, Allen & Gooch, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. James S. Gates, Morrow, Gates, & Morrow, LLC, Opelousas, LA, for Plain
Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.public domain
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Stephen Hadley ("Plaintiff") brings the instant putative class action against Defendant Kellogg Sales Company ("Kellogg") for allegedly misleading statements on Kellogg's food product packaging. Before the Court are (1) Plaintiff's motion for class certification; and (2) Kellogg's motion to exclude the opinion testimony of Steven P. Gaskin. Having considered the parties' briefing,
Suchanek v. Sturm Foods, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: Defendants, Sturm Foods, Inc., and its parent company Treehouse Foods, Inc., manufactured single-serve coffee cups for use in Keurig machines and marketed them under the name Grove Square Coffee (“GSC”). The eight named Plaintiffs each purchased GSC, but were extremely unsatisfied with their purchase. They claim that Defendants packaged, marketed, distrib
644 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2009) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA PSYCHIATRIC TRANSITIONS, INC., Defendant. No. 1:06-CV-01251-OWW-GSA. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 4, 2009. *1252 Dana C. Johnson, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Los Angeles, CA, Evangelina Patricia H
Alch v. Superior Courtpublic domain
19 Cal.Rptr.3d 29 (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 339 Cecile ALCH, et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Time Warner Entertainment, et al., Real Parties in Interest. Hindi Brooks et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. William Morris Agency, Inc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Hindi Brooks, et al., Petitioners, v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Respo
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS