Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 442 ¶ 1 William C. Bibbs appeals from the January 2, 2007 judgment of sentence of an aggregate of fourteen to thirty years' incarceration imposed following his convictions for robbery (18 Pa.C.S. § 3701(a)(1)(i)), conspiracy to commit robbery (18 Pa.C.S. § 903<

488 F.Supp.2d 925 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Maurice BIBBS, Defendant. No. CR 07-336 WHA (BZ). United States District Court, N.D. California. June 8, 2007. William Frentzen, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANT BIBBS'S OBJECTION TO THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDING AT THE DETENTION HEARING BY WAY OF

252 F.Supp.2d 170 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Jesse BIBBS, Defendant. No. CR.A. 01-319-1. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 21, 2003. M. Taylor Aspinwall, Esquire, U.S. Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs. William J. Brennan, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM & ORDER KAT

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IRENE C. BERGER, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Document 66), the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 115), the Plaintiffs Responses in Op*763position (Documents 89 & 120), the Defendants’ Replies (Documents 100 &

People v Bibbs (2025 NY Slip Op 03079) People v Bibbs 2025 NY Slip Op 03079 Decided on May 21, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER R. CLARKE VANDERVORT, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court are the following Motions: (1) Plaintiffs “Motion to Compel Disclosure of Discovery Requests” (Document No. 32.), filed on August 6, 2012; (2) Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (Document No. 37.), filed on August 14, 2012; and (3) Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Document No. 4

FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 22-SEP-2025 10:20 AM Dkt. 154 OP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant William Bibbs, acting pro se, appeals from an order denying a motion that he styled as a "Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea/Motion to Correct sentence Per Ohio Criminal Rule 32.1." Bibbs contends that the trial court erred by *Page 2 finding that the sentence could not be reviewed and by converting the motion to a petition for post-conviction reli

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed December 5, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00939-CR TRADEZSHA BIBBS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 177th District Court Harris County, Texas

SIMEONE, Senior Judge. This is an appeal by movant-appellant, John Bibbs, from an order of the circuit court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate sentence without an evidentiary hearing. In 1979, movant was found guilty by a jury of assault in the first degree for which he was sentenced to a term of 30 years imprisonment as a dangerous offender pursuant to § 558.016 R.S.Mo., 1986

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered February 11, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degre

[Cite as State v. Bibbs, 2016-Ohio-8396.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 5-16-11 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. KEVIN E. BIBBS, SR., OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Hancock County Common Pleas Court

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered February 11, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degre

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 7 KA 15-01193 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONROE BIBBS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO DANIELL W. BIBBS, ) No. ED107490 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs.

ORDER PER CURIAM: The Judgments of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia are affirmed.

Mr. JUSTICE GUILD, dissenting: I dissent. The majority have cited several cases where the defendant was apprehended in the possession of burglary tools during the night time. The majority points out that the defendants were seen in the large shopping center parking lot at Oak Brook during business hours. I do not think that we have to divorce o

541 F.3d 267 (2008) Juarez Miguel BIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leslie EARLY; Jamie Burkholder; Richard Gibson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-10452. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 12, 2008. *268 Juarez Miguel Bibbs, Beeville, TX, pro se. Christopher Champion Wike, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees

NO. 07-11-00064-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 RODRICK L. BIBBS, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM THE

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J), rendered February 3, 2003, as amended on or about March 24, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 14 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding to Supreme Court for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed. As the Pe