⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Biax Corporation v. Intel Corporation”

District Court, D. Colorado · 2010-09-21 · Published · cited 0× · 271 F.R.D. 200; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105869; 2010 WL 3777540
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff BIAX’s Motion to Compel Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things ¡filed June 14, 2010; docket # 226 ]; Plaintiff BIAX’s Motion to Compel NVIDIA to Respond to Plaintiffs Third Set of Interrogatories and F
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008-10-21 · Published · cited 143× · 544 F.3d 1341; 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1161; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21880; 2008 WL 4636167
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN, in which Circuit Judge ARCHER concurs in the judgment and joins except as to Parts I and VI. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from the grant of a preliminary injunction, pending final resolution of the several challenges raised by Sandoz, Inc. to the validity, enforceability, and infringement of