⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Bianca F. Burnett”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012-11-02 · Published · cited 76× · 699 F.3d 778; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22588; 2012 WL 5378085
OPINION THACKER, Circuit Judge: Bianca Ellis, Mark Sroka, and Jaqueline Sroka (collectively, the “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing their putative class action complaint. They claim that Louisiana-Pacific Corp. (“LP” or the “Appellee”) negligently designed and manufactured Trimboard, a composite building product designed and marke
Walker v. Kellypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 598 F.3d 167; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4911; 2010 WL 801567
598 F.3d 167 (2010) Darick Demorris WALKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Loretta K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-11. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. March 9, 2010. Craig Goldblatt, Annie Lawrence Owens, Danielle Spinelli, D. Hien Tran, *168 Heather Marie Zachary, Wilmerhale, Washin
Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995-03-30 · Published · cited 4× · 656 A.2d 1094; 1995 Del. LEXIS 117; 1995 WL 142420
This is an interlocutory appeal by Hoechst Celanese Corporation and Celanese Engineering *Page 1095 Resins, Inc. ("HCC") from the entry of summary judgment by the Superior Court in favor of the London Market Insurers ("London"). The Superior Court certified this interlocutory appeal on August 26, 1994. This Court accepted the appeal on September 1, 1994. This Court has concluded that the Superior Court erred procedurally in shifting the ini
Walker v. Kellypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-12-16 · Published · cited 146× · 589 F.3d 127; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27545; 2009 WL 4877761
GREGORY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Today, the majority affirms the district court’s dismissal of Walker’s Brady claim in this capital case only by departing from this Court’s prior decision in Walker II, 195 Fed.Appx. 169 (4th Cir.2006). Having heard Walker II, I disagree with the majority’s interpretation of the case. This Court’s determinations in Walker II that Walker es
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005-06-09 · Published · cited 8× · 210 S.W.3d 40; 362 Ark. 568
210 S.W.3d 40 (2005) Dezoray GAILEY, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees. No. 04-806. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 9, 2005. *42 Don R. Etherly, Helena, for appellant. Barrett & Deacon, P.A., by: D.P. Marshall, Kevin W. Cole, and Andrew H. Dallas, Jonesboro, for appellee. JIM GUNTER, Justice.</
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE