Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. In these related cases, Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 barring Defendants from implementing various provisions of North Carolina Session Law 2013-381 (“SL 2013-381”), an omnibus election-reform law.1 (Docs. 96 & 98 in case L13CV861; Docs. 10

129 N.J. 557 (1992) 610 A.2d 814 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARKO BEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued October 8, 1991. Decided July 28, 1992. *567 James K. Smith, Jr., Deputy Public Defender, and Claudia Van Wyk, Deputy Public Defender II, argu

ACCEPTED 13-15-00174-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/22/2015 8:09:32 PM

ACCEPTED 14-15-00178-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/21/2015 11:31:57 AM

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver

745 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) Melanie CLINE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-CV-1070. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 30, 2010. *783 Alphonse A. Gerhardstein, Gerhardstein & Branch, Cincinnati, OH, David B. Malik, Chesterland, OH, Edwin J. Vargas, Cle

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING PETITIONER’S HABEAS PETITION WITH PREJUDICE MARY G. LEWIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case was filed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. Petitioner is represented by excellent counsel. The matter is before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge sugge

J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge This matter is before the court for review of the Magistrate Judge's July 11, 2018 Report and Recommendation ("Report") (ECF No. 51), recommending the court grant Defendant Inmate Classification Committee Chairperson Mrs. Ravenal's ("Defendant") Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22). For the reasons below, the court REJECTS the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 51

[Cite as Robol v. Columbus, 2025-Ohio-973.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Charles Robol, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 24AP-348 (C.P.C. No. 22CV-7497) v. : (REGULAR C

BRIEF.The original bill in this case was filed on the 16th of May, 1866, for the purpose of having the assets of the Bank of Tennessee administered, under the orders and decrees of the court, in accordance with the provisions of a general assignment made on the 4th of May, 1866. This-assignment was authorized and directed by an act of the-General Assembly, passed on the 16th of February, 1866,. entitled “an act to wind up and settle the business of the

The opinion of the court was delivered by Valentine, J.: This action was commenced by the defendant in error, in the court below, to recover from the county of Leavenworth a sum of money claimed to be due upon a certain bond of said county. This bond is for the sum of $250, and is one of a series of bonds amounting in the aggregate to the sum of $250,000, issued by said county to the Union Pacific Railway Comp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C., et al., Plaintiffs, No. 20-cv-1469 (DLF) (LEAD) v. No. 20-cv-1542 (DLF) (Consolidated) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C., et al., Plaintiffs, No. 20-cv-1469 (DLF) (LEAD) v. No. 20-cv-1542 (DLF) (Consolidated) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

876 F.Supp. 756 (1995) Stanley E. WOODS, # 128876; Jamel Kabir (I'Man), # 142670; Kush Abdul B Ali Abu Abbass (A/K/A Charles James Lee), # 140852; Yusuf Abdur Rahman, # 132820; and John Brinson, # 161601, Plaintiffs, v. Commissioner Parker EVATT; Warden Benjamin Montgomery; Deputy Warden Bernard Walker; Chaplain George P. Windley; and the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3:94-1071-3BC.

*333 SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Congress enacted the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”) following a two-year investigation into allegations of union wrongdoing by the Senate Select Committee on Improper Activities in the Labor Management Field. In introducing the LMRDA, Senator

[Cite as State v. Burden, 2013-Ohio-1628.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. P

609 F.Supp.2d 561 (2009) William Henry HARRISON a/k/a God Kundalini Isa Allah, Plaintiff, v. Harrell WATTS, et al., Defendants. No. 1:06cv1061 (TSE/TCB). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. March 26, 2009. *563 William Henry Harrison, Richmond, VA, pro se. Monika L. Moore, U.S. Attorney Office

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1193THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Santos Gonzales' Motion for Production of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements, Pre-Trial Hearing on Their Admissibility Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), filed May 9, 2017 (Doc. 1141)("Gonzales Motion"); (ii) Defenda