Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bey v. Sims”
Sims v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-CF-914 ARIK ADANI SIMS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPEL
Ford-Bey v. United Statespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ISMAEL FORD-BEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-2039 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.
in Re: Kenneth Hickman-Beypublic domain
NUMBER 13-09-00331-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG HUGO HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 107th District Court
Pleasant-Bey v. United Statespublic domain
988 A.2d 496 (2010) Ali PLEASANT-BEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 07-CF-706. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 13, 2009. Decided February 4, 2010. *497 Jonathan W. Anderson, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Jaclyn S. Frankfurt, Public Defender Service, were on
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
2021 IL App (1st) 210168 THIRD DIVISION March 12, 2021 No. 1-21-0168 JANICE I. SIMS, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) Cook County. Petitioner-Appellant, )
Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, Va.public domain
678 F.Supp.2d 348 (2009) Christina D. PERRY-BEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:08cv100. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. January 15, 2009. *351 Christina D. Perry-Bey, pro se. Paul W. Jacobs, II, Melvin W. Ringer, for Defendant. OPINION
Sims v. Kernanpublic domain
29 F.Supp.2d 952 (1998) Mario L. SIMS, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Joseph E. KERNAN, individually and in his official capacity of Lieutenant Governor of the State of Indiana, Frank O'Bannon, individually and in his official capacity, Michael P. Barnes, individually and in his official capacity as the elected prosecutor of St. Joseph County, John Marnocha, individually and in his official capacity as the chief deputy prosecutor of St. Joseph County, H. Joh
Jones-Bey v. Wrightpublic domain
944 F.Supp. 723 (1996) Nathaniel JONES-BEY, Plaintiff, v. Charles WRIGHT, Charles Stang, Charles Motley, M.D., Laurie Ebling, Andre Lawson, James Kimmel, Dawn MacMillan, Michael T. Scott, Paula Gott, Purnell Sparks, W. Dobson, and D. Davis, Defendants. No. 3:95-CV-0789AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. October 30, 1996.
People v. Beypublic domain
21 Cal.App.4th 1623 (1993) 27 Cal. Rptr.2d 28 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES JOHNSON BEY, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. B064955. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. December 22, 1993. *1624 COUNSEL Richard Jay Moller, under appointment by the Court o
People v. Simspublic domain
658 N.E.2d 413 (1995) 167 Ill.2d 483 212 Ill.Dec. 931 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Robert SIMS, Appellant. No. 74002. Supreme Court of Illinois. September 21, 1995. Rehearing Denied December 4, 1995. *416 Charles M. Schiedel, Deputy Defender, an
Gregory-Bey v. Statepublic domain
669 N.E.2d 154 (1996) Lawrence GREGORY-BEY, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). No. 49S00-9501-CR-37. Supreme Court of Indiana. July 19, 1996. *156 Nancy L. Broyles, Indianapolis, for Appellant. Pamela Carter, Attorney General, Christopher L. LaFuse, Deputy Attorney General, Indian
State v. Beypublic domain
HANDLER, J., dissenting. In State v. Bey, 112 N.J. 123, 548 A.2d 887 (1988) (Bey II), this Court affirmed Marko Bey’s conviction for the murder of Carol Peniston, but vacated his sentence of death and remanded the case for a second capital-sentencing proceeding. A second jury has sentenced defendant to death for the Peniston murder. The Court affirms that death sentence.
Sims v. Statepublic domain
The appellant, Brad Haywood Sims, was convicted of distributing a controlled substance, cocaine, in violation of § 13A-12-211, Code of Alabama 1975. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison. The sentence was split, with three years to be served in prison and the remainder on probation. The instant appeal is the result of the appellant's second trial. The appellant's first *Page 1273 trial ended in a mistrial with t
Smith-Bey v. District of Columbiapublic domain
546 F.Supp. 813 (1982) Albert Earle SMITH-BEY, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 81-2536. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 1982. *814 Timothy J. Lindon, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Donald A. Thigpen, Jr., Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washi
Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Simspublic domain
GOODE, J. Respondent is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois. It instituted this action on a covenant contained in a deed executed by appellant Sims, November 29, 1898, which was intended to convey the growing timber on a tract of land in Pemiscot county, Missouri, and allow respon*572dent to cut and remove the timber within three years f
Spell v. Kendall-Futuro Co.public domain
ORDER COBB, District Judge. Before the court is the Defendant’s Motion for Destructive Testing. After considering the Motion, this Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted with specified limitations. The plaintiff seeks recovery for personal injuries allegedly sustained when the cane manufactured by the defendant failed. The defendant seeks to destructively
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.public domain
OPINION STONEBURNER, Judge. In 2001, appellants sued respondents Altria Group Inc. (Atria) (formerly Philip Morris Companies Inc.) and Philip Morris Incorporated (Philip Morris) under Minn. Stat. § 8.31, subd. 3a,1 seeking damages and other relief, individually and on behalf of a class, alleging false advertising, consumer fraud, and deceptive trade practices regarding “light”
Ruchames v. New York & Presbyt. Hosp.public domain
Ruchames v New York & Presbyt. Hosp. (2019 NY Slip Op 07718) Ruchames v New York & Presbyt. Hosp. 2019 NY Slip Op 07718 Decided on October 29, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York Stat
State v. Phillipspublic domain
[Cite as State v. Phillips, 2022-Ohio-375.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110526 v. : ANDRE DA VONNE PHILLIPS,