Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1293 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1294 OPINION Josephine Larner, a nurse, sued her former hospital employer for violation of overtime laws, p

SULLIVAN, Senior Judge (concurring in part and in the result): The first granted issue asks whether the military judge erred in considering appellant’s unlawful pretrial punishment as a mitigating factor in determining his adjudged sentence. See RCM 1002 and 1001(c)(1)(B), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1998 ed.).1 Such a sentencing approach was permissible pr

243 F.Supp.2d 166 (2003) In re CENDANT CORPORATION LITIGATION. Civ. No. 98-1664(WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 5, 2003. *168 Robert E. Tarleton, Summit, NJ, for special master. Allyn Zissel Lite, Lite, Depalma, Greenberg and Rivas, LCC, Newark, NJ, A. Richard Ross, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecc

Opinion CROSKEY, J. Dan Bridgeford and Lucianna Tarin appeal the dismissal of their complaint after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. They contend the trial court misapplied the doctrine of collateral estoppel in holding that their class claims are precluded, and there is no basis to dismiss their individual claims or their representative claims under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General

754 F.Supp.2d 293 (2010) IN RE NEURONTIN MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Harden Manufacturing Corporation; Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross/Blue of Louisiana; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 68 Welfare Fund; ASEA/AFSCME Local 52 Health Benefits Trust; Gerald Smith; and Lorraine Kopa, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Pfizer, Inc. and Warner

MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTI, Chief Judge. I. Introduction This case is an appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order confirming the Modified Third Amended Plan of Reorganization (“plan”) of debtor Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (“Pittsburgh Corning”) and issuing an asbestos permanent channeling injunction under 11 U.S.C. § 524(g). The bankruptcy court explained the reasons for the order in an

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published

524 F.3d 384 (2008) CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Michael R. Bloomberg,[*] Mayor of the City of New York, Christine C. Quinn,[**] Speaker of the New York City Council, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, United States of America, Intervenor, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP., Browning Arms Co., Colt's Mfg. Co., Inc., Forjas Taurus, S.A., Glock Inc., Phoenix Arms, Sigarm

224 N.J. Super. 563 (1986) 540 A.2d 1350 ESTATE OF JAMES MCGRATH, JR., BY HIS EXECUTRIX, JEAN MCGRATH, AND 1200 OTHER INJURED RESIDENTS OF THE PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, PLAINTIFFS, v. NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Passaic County. Decided October 17, 1986.

279 N.J. Super. 449 (1995) 653 A.2d 568 GENERAL MOTORS CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF LINDEN, THE ASSESSOR OF LINDEN, AND RICHARD CHAIKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 5, 1994. Decided February 3, 1995. *453

236 N.J. Super. 451 (1989) 566 A.2d 215 SHELDON H. PARKER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. M & T CHEMICALS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE; GORDON C. ANDREWS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS VICE-PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY OF M & T CHEMICALS, INC.; WILLIAM M. KRAUS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS VICE-PRESIDENT OF M & T CHEMICALS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Je

The opinion of the court was delivered by Lewis, P. J. A. D. This consolidated proceeding embraces three appeals from four separate orders of the Law Division regarding the recent effort of the Citywide Independent League (O.I.L.) and the Community Action Council (C.A.C.), two civic and political organizations of the City of Jersey City (city), to recall the mayor and seven of the nine councilmen of the city. T

114 N.J. Super. 421 (1971) 276 A.2d 868 IN THE MATTER OF PETITION OF THOMAS F.X. SMITH, MUNICIPAL CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, IN RE RECALL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY. THOMAS F. McGOVERN AND ANIELLO R. PECORARO, INDIVIDUALLY AND INCUMBENT COUNCILMEN OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THOMAS F.X. SMITH, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Chief Judge. I. Introduction & Summaby. .217 II. Facts & Procedural History 221 *217 Background. to to The Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel to to to <