Cases

Opinion issued December 31, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00036-CV ——————————— HR MARTIN COUNTY LANDFILL, LLC AND THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS, Appellants V.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 28, 2019 NO. 03-17-00365-CV Mateo Cortez, as Representative of the Estate of Deborah Cortez, Appellant v. Sandra Flesher Brown, Charlotte Flesher Ash, Charlene Flesher Johnston, Connie Lou Keith Barry, Randall Wayne Davis, Virginia Villers, Charles Roberts, Lisa A. S

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00365-CV Mateo Cortez, as Representative of the Estate of Deborah Cortez, Appellant v. Sandra Flesher Brown, Charlotte Flesher Ash, Charlene Flesher Johnston, Connie Lou Keith Barry, Randall Wayne Davis, Virginia Villers, Charles Roberts, Lisa A. Smith, Patricia Chapman, Betty J. Marks Webb, James Berl Marks,

ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21564324 THIRD COURT OF APP

ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21650658 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21279823 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21265641 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21650658 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21266118 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21306984 THIRD COURT OF

917 S.W.2d 135 (1996) Ronnie Joe JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-94-430-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 22, 1996. *136 J. Rex Barnett, Fort Worth, for appellant. Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Attorney, Betty Marshall and Charles Mallin, Asst. Chief Appellate Sec., David M. Curl, Steve

I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority because I disagree with the conclusion that appellant is not entitled to Workers' Compensation benefits. Whether appellant is entitled to participate in the Workers' Compensation Fund is solely dependent on whether Martha Johnston was within the "zone of employment" when she was injured. In Fogaras v. University Hospitals of Cleveland (1998), 129 Ohio App.3d 653,718 N.E.2d 974</

Alice Robie Resnick, J. On April 30, 1992, James Johnston, now deceased, received an injury in the course of, and arising out of, his employment with Trans-Fleet Enterprises, Inc., a State Fund employer. His workers’ compensation claim was allowed for “sprain lumbar; lumbar disc displacement with myelopathy at L3-4 left & L5-S1 right.” James received temporary total disability compensation from May 16, 1992 to November 29, 19

513 S.E.2d 70 (1999) WHITECO OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, a division of Whiteco Industries, Inc., Petitioner, v. JOHNSTON COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Respondent. No. COA98-580. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 2, 1999. *72 Wilson & Waller, P.A., by Betty S. Waller, Raleigh, for petitioner-appellant. J. Mark Payne and

*561 ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge. Volunteers of America Oklahoma, Inc. (“the VAO”) appeals from the order denying its motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the claims brought against it by its employees who work as Habilitation Training Specialists and Ha-bilitation Training Specialist Managers (“Ha

Brown, Judge. [1] Michael A. Johnston, Jr., appeals his convictions and sentence for domestic battery as a level 6 felony, criminal mischief as a class B misdemeanor, two counts of disorderly conduct as class B misdemeanors, and two counts of resisting law enforcement as class A misdemeanors. He raises three issues which we revise and restate as: I. Whether

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. CALLAHAN, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. I. NATURE OF THE CASE On December 13, 2010, Betty B. John-stone (“Johnstone” or “plaintiff’) commenced this action, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have consented to United States magistrate judge jurisdiction pur

OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Betty Adair brought this lawsuit against defendants James E. “Sam” Johnston, Pike County Title and Abstract Company, Inc., and MONY Life Insurance Company, claiming violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1461. Jurisdiction over Adair’s claim is proper under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331 (federal question) and 2

807 N.E.2d 461 (2004) 209 Ill.2d 302 282 Ill.Dec. 837 Harold A. FRITZ, Appellant, v. John W. JOHNSTON et al., Appellees. No. 96325. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 18, 2004. *463 Robert C. Strodel, Peoria, for appellant. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Springfield (Gary Fein

WALLITSCH, J., We have before us a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Dow Chemical Company, t/a Dow Chemical U.S.A., as well as a motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendant J.C. Ehrlich Co. Inc. On October 1,1986, pursuant to an arrangement between plaintiffs, James and Betty Johnston, and Ehrlich, one of Ehrlich’s employees sprayed a pest control formulation containing Dursban L.O