Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 7, 2007 Session LANIER WORLDWIDE, INC. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL. A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 06-2030-II The Honorable Carol McCoy, Chancellor No. M2006-02630-COA-R3-CV - Filed on April 17, 2007 This case involves the protest of a bid made pur

115 F.Supp.2d 1330 (2000) Ron MAYS, Plaintiff, v. LANIER WORLDWIDE, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 97-D-1451-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. September 27, 2000. *1331 *1332 *1333 *1334

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Nicholas Small (“Small” or “plaintiff’) brought this action against Bud-K Worldwide, Inc. (“Bud-K”), Kathleen M. Rice (“Rice”) and Lauren J. Kalaudjian (“Kalaudjian”) (collectively the “defendants”).1 Plaintiff seeks a declaration from Rice and Kalaudjian (the “County defendants”) that the “Black Cat Key-chain,”

OPINION MILLER, Judge. This pre-award bid protest is before the court after argument on cross-motions for summary judgment. Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. (“plaintiff’), seeks to enjoin the non-competitive award of a contract by the United States Postal Service (the “USPS”) to Federal Express Corporation (“intervenor”). Recently, the USPS awarded, on a sole-source basis, a seven-year contract v

378 F.Supp.2d 1 (2005) ECHOMAIL, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS CO., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-11318NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 15, 2005. Alan D. Rose, Jr., Rose & Associates, Boston, for Ecomail, Inc, Plaintiff. John F. Farraher, Jr., Greenberg Traurig LLP, Stephen D. Poss, Goodwin Procter, LLP, Boston, MA, Tho

NUMBER 13-19-00206-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG HOLT TEXAS, LTD., Appellant, v. EUSTACIO RUBIO D/B/A DELATA AGGREGATE & LANDSCAPING MATERIALS, Appellee. On appeal from the 139th D

NORTH SAILS GROUP, LLC v. BOARDS AND MORE GMBH ET AL. (SC 20338) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.* Syllabus The plaintiff, N Co., sought to recover damages from the defendants, B Co. and E Co., for breach of a trademark licensing agreement, pursuant to which B Co. was granted a worldwide license to use N Co.’s trade name and certain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-1695 Filed: March 4, 2025 Reissued: March 17, 2025 † WARRIOR FOCUSED SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and VALIANT GLOBAL DEFENSE SERVICES, INC., Intervenor-Defendant. W. Brad English, Emily J. Chancey, Mic

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge This is a putative securities class action brought by plaintiff Ryan Coffey against defendants Ripple Labs, Inc. ("Ripple"), XRP II, LLC, a subsidiary of Ripple, and Bradley Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple. Compl. at 1, ¶ 13. Plaintiff filed this action in the San Francisco Superior Court on May 3, 2018. On June 1, 2018, defendants removed this action pursuant to the Class Action Fairne

745 F.Supp.2d 1101 (2010) EDGE GAMES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. No. C 10-02614 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 1, 2010. *1103 Daniel Mcartur Shafer, Christopher D. Banys, The Lanier Law Firm, P.C., Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintif

FILED IN BUSINESS COURT OF TEXAS BEVERLY CRUMLEY, CLERK ENTERED 5/15/2026 2026 Tex. Bus. 28 THE B

LYNCH, Chief Judge. Christopher Willson, an engineer for battery producer Electric Vehicles Worldwide (EVW), was convicted of submitting false invoices and conspiring to defraud the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in connection with federal grants to develop a battery for electric mass transit. Willson appeals, arguing that the government’s evidence was insufficient to suppor

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs United Steelworkers and Local Union 193-G (collectively, “the Union”) and defendant PPG Industries disagreed about whether PPG timely presented bar- *582 gaming proposals under a collective bargaining agreement. The parties entered into arbitration, and the arbitrat

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION1 Gerald E. Rosen, Chief Judge, United States District Court I. INTRODUCTION On December 30, 2014, Plaintiff Alix-Partners LLP, a global consulting and business advisory firm organized under the laws of the state of Delaware,1

Memberworks, Inc., a defendant in an action pending in the Mobile Circuit Court, appeals from that court's order denying its motion to compel arbitration. Memberworks argues that it has proven the existence of a contract calling for arbitration and has proven that that contract involves a transaction substantially affecting interstate commerce. James A. Yance, Jr., the plaintiff, argues that he never assented to an agreement to arbitrate. We reverse and remand. I.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1463 ADRIANNA WADSWORTH, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CHUCK NGUYEN, MSAD 40/RSU 40, and ANDREW CAVANAUGH, Defendants, Appellees, MEDOMAK VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL, Defendant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE D

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-780C (Filed Under Seal: November 28, 2022) (Reissued for Publication: December 6, 2022) ) AHTNA LOGISTICS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. )

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 19-1105 __________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT V.A. HARRA, JR., Appellant __________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D. Del. No. 1:15-

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has additionally filed a motion for a hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (DN 20). These matters are fully briefed and are ripe for adjudication.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON NON-DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBTS PURSUANT TO §§ 523(a)(4) and 523(a)(6) [relates to Adv. No. 10-03583, Doc. No. 41; Adv. No. 10-03584, Doc. No. 51; Adv. No. 10-03585, Doc. No. 58] JEFF BOHM, Chief Judge. I. Introduction These adversary proceedings, which were tried simultaneously, concern the existence of certain debts pursuant to Texas state law,