Cases

OPINION Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD. This case involves a dispute over funds distributed from a joint tenancy account. Rhonda Mims-Brown, appellant, challenges the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Bessie Brown. 1 In five issues, Rhonda contends the trial court er

428 S.W.2d 911 (1968) Albert J. GROH and Bessie M. Groh, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Oscar SHELTON, Ethel Shelton and Geo. F. Addison, Trustee, Defendants-Appellants. No. 8709. Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri. May 20, 1968. *913 William E. Seay, Salem, for defendants-appellants. Dorman L. Steelman, Salem, for plainti

This appeal involves a quiet title action involving the severed mineral estate of two specific parcels of real estate situated in Tuscaloosa County. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The Tuscaloosa County lands which are the subject of this appeal are: 160 acres located in Section 26, Township 19 South, Range 11 West; and 240 acres located in Section 27, Township 19 South, Range 11 West. The appellants, who were the defendants below, and the appellees, who were the p

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for damages. James W. Morris filed an action against Oscar Goodwin, Bessie Lee Sanders and Purcell Sanders seeking $4,040 as the remaining amount due on a construction contract and the imposition of a lien. The case was tried before the court sitting without a jury and a judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $4,263 and imposing a lien on the subject property to the extent of $4,040. After defendants' motion for a

CLIFF HOOFMAN, Judge. This case involves a long-running and sometimes violent family dispute over a tract of land in Van Burén and Stone Counties. Appellant Bessie Tillery and appellee Charlie Gardner are two of the eight children of Thomas Gardner, who died in 1961, leaving a large tract of land, which included the disputed twenty-eight acres in Van Burén County, to pass by intestacy. Thomas was surv

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR PER CURIAM. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is published in 398 S.W.2d 329. The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. This action is not, however, to be taken as an approval of the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that the surety on the bond was a necessary party to the appeal from the probat

Claborn Newsom and others, the surviving brothers and sisters of J. R. Newsom, deceased, brought this suit on July 18, 1963, in the District Court as a certiorari proceeding to set aside an order or decree of the County Court of Brown County, entered on July 6, 1962, directing Mrs. Bessie Newsom, administratrix of the estate of J. R. Newsom, deceased, to convey certain land of the said J. R. Newsom estate to D. S. Gentry and wife, Joan Gentry, in compliance

Cite as 2015 Ark. 253 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-1033 GGNSC ARKADELPHIA, LLC D/B/A Opinion Delivered June 4, 2015 GOLDEN LIVING CENTER- ARKADELPHIA; GGNSC CAMDEN, APPEAL FROM THE OUACHITA LLC D/B/A GOLDEN LIVING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CENTER-CAMDEN; GGNSC [NO. CV-2011-121-6] CROSSETT, LLC D/B/A GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-CROSSETT; GGNSC EL DORADO III, LLC D/B/A GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-EL

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HAIGHT, District Judge: Plaintiff Bessie Hannahs, a retiree from teaching in the public school system in Jamestown, New York, brought this action to challenge as discriminatory the use of sex-differentiated actuarial tables in calculating the amount of monthly benefits a public school teacher receives upon retirement. The identity and status of the several defendants, and plai

834 F.2d 299 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,717, 56 USLW2380, 43 Ed. Law Rep. 27,9 Employee Benefits Ca 1233 Jewell A. BROWN and Jane Rose, Appellants,v.NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM; Kenneth E.Buhrmaster, Hiram Korpeck, Nicholas Maletta, Frank WellsMcCabe, Ellis Ostrove, Richard E. Ten Haken, Carl Fredeen,Roderick Sager, and Margaret Mary Walsh, individually and asmembers of the

144 Ga. App. 836 (1978) 242 S.E.2d 754 WHITEHEAD v. THE STATE. 54998. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted January 3, 1978. Decided February 16, 1978. Edwards, Edwards & Edwards, H. B. Edwards, III, for appellant. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Richard W. Shelton, Assistant District Attorney, for

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777

"The rule governing cases in which the parties are not in pari delicto is frequently applied where the transaction is in violation of a law made for the protection of one party against the acts of the other. As they are not equally guilty, the party protected may recover. A statute may declare an agreement to be void, and yet only one of the parties may be guilty of its violation. Enactments of this character are often made for the purpose of protecting one class of men from the oppression an

PER CURIAM. The judgment, appealed from in part, was rendered pursuant to the decision of this Court in this case, Walling v. Crane, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 80, wherein we held it was not the intent of Congress that the Administrator should by injunction and civil contempt proceedings collect deficiencies in wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The Supreme Court has now held otherwise in McCom

1. This court in a judgment entered in this case (Carter v. Butler, 71 Ga. App. 492, 31 S.E.2d 210), reversed the judgment of the civil court of Fulton County, and the Supreme Court on certiorari having reversed the judgment of this court (Butler v. Carter, 198 Ga. 754, 32 S.E.2d 808), the judgment of reversal original

1. The duty of keeping, preserving, and producing records of the hours worked by employees, under the provisions of the fair-labor standards act, is the duty of the employer and not the employee. (a) The evidence in this case was not sufficient to establish the fact that the employee had participated in an illegal and unlawful conspiracy to violate the provisions of the fair-labor standards act. 2. The fair-labor standards act is a statute affected with a public interes

PER CURIAM: Two retired women teachers and one current woman teacher with vested pension and annuity benefits appeal from a memorandum opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles S. Haight, Jr., Judge, pertaining to the use of sex-distinct mortality tables. Hannahs v. New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, 656 F.Supp. 387 (S.D.N.Y.1987). Following Arizo

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge. The suit brought by the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor was to restrain violations of the overtime and record keeping requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.1 ******The violation claimed was that defendant, in determining the “regular rate of pay” on which overtime compensation was computed and paid, had fa

ACCEPTED 05-24-00043-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 8/22/2025 4:43 PM

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge. The appellants are individuals who conduct a manufacturing business and Jacksonville Paper Company, a corporation owned by tire individuals, which buys their products and other goods and sells them through a main office and warehouse at Jacksonville, Florida, and through thirteen branch offices and warehouses at other points in Florida, Georgia and Alabama. They at first considered that their several b