Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Bertini v. Apple Inc.”
Bertini v. Apple Inc.public domain
Case: 21-2301 Document: 75 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHARLES BERTINI, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ______________________ 2021-2301 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Paten
Case: 23-1375 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 03/19/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DOLLAR FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Appellant v. BRITTEX FINANCIAL, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-1375 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Simon v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: In her Amended Complaint, plaintiff Susan Simon alleges that defendant medical device manufacturer Smith & Nephew, Inc. (“Smith & Nephew”) designed, manufactured, and distributed the REFLECTION 3 Acetabular System (“R3 Acetabu-lar System”) and the optional metal liner component used in her hip replacement surgery, that the devices
THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: November 1, 2023 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Adamson Systems Engineering, Inc.
Restivo v. Hessemannpublic domain
Judge LIVINGSTON concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion. POOLER, Circuit Judge: Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Joanna Seybert, /.) judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees John Restivo and Dennis Halstead following a jury trial. Defendant-appellant Carolann Hessemann, as executrix of the Estate of Joseph Volpe, (“Volpe”) challenges the d
Restivo v. Hessemannpublic domain
14-4662 Restivo v. Hessemann 14‐4662‐cv Restivo v. Hessemann 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2015 6 7 (Argued: April 5, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2017)
KME Germany GmbH v. Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd.public domain
This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: September 29, 2023 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ KME Germany GmbH v.