Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case
via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Berner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.”
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Brick Institute of America, the Public Service Commission of the State of Newyork, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Elizabeth Town Gas Company, South Newjersey Gas Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Linecorp., Publicservice Company of North Carolina, Inc., North Carolina Natural Gascorporation, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Public Service Electric& Gas Company, United Cities Gas Company, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Newjersey Board of Public Utilitycommissioners, Brick Association of North Carolina, Washington Gas Lightcompany, South Carolina Public Service Commission and South Carolina Energymanagement Office, General Motors Corporation, Staffer Chemical Company,philadelphia Gas Works,owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, American Textile Manufacturers Institute,inc., and Long Island Lighting Company, Intervenors. State of North Carolina and North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Power Commission, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., Brick Institute of America, the Publicservice Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Company of Northcarolina, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, North Carolina Naturalgas Corporation,consolidated Edison Company of New York, United Cities Gas Company, Washingtongas Light Company, Pomana Corporation, Brick Association of North Carolina,south Carolina Public Service Commission and South Carolina Energy Managementoffice, Generalmotors Corporation, Staffer Chemical Company, Philadelphia Gas Works, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc.,and Long Island Lighting Company, (Lilco), Intervenors. Alabama Gas Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Southeast Alabama Gas District, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Southern Natural Gascompany, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Brick Institute of America, Georgia Industrial Group, and Alabama Public Service Commission, Intervenors. Battle Creek Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, General Motors Corporation, Caterpillartractor Company, Mueller Brass Company, Corning Glass Works, Missourirefractories, Andersonclayton Foods, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Johns-Manville Fiberglass, Inc., and City of Indianapolis, Intervenors. v. Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Brickinstitute of America and Georgia Industrial Group, Intervenors. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Anchor Hocking Corporation, Caterpillar Tractorcompany, National Distillers & Chemical Corporation, Battle Creek Gas Company,et Al., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, General Motors Corporation,mueller Brasscompany, Corning Glass Works, Inc., A. P. Green Refractories Company,anderson Clayton Foods, Etc., Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Johns-Manvile Fiber Glass, Inc., and City of Indianapolis, Intervenorspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975-07-25 · Published · cited 17× · 512 F.2d 1332
512 F.2d 1332 168 U.S.App.D.C. 92 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioner,v.FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent,Brick Institute of America, The Public Service Commission ofthe State of NewYork, Piedmont Natural Gas Company,Elizabeth town Gas Company, South NewJersey Gas Company,Atlanta Gas Light Company, Transcontinental Gas PipeLineCorp., PublicService Company of North Car
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Brick Institute of America, Intervenors. State of North Carolina and North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Power Commission, Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Inc., Intervenors. Alabama Gas Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Southeast Alabama Gas District, Intervenors. Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Intervenors. Battle Creek Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, National Distillers and Chemical Corp., Intervenors. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Intervenorspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974-11-26 · Published · cited 11× · 511 F.2d 372
511 F.2d 372 167 U.S.App.D.C. 134 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioner,v.FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent,Brick Institute of America, Intervenors.STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and North Carolina UtilitiesCommission, Petitioners,v.FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent,Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Inc., et al., Intervenors.ALABAMA GAS CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.FED
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002-03-13 · Published · cited 128× · 794 A.2d 1141; 2002 Del. LEXIS 214
VEASEY, Chief Justice. This case involves a merger agreement that plaintiffs seek to reform based upon an alleged mistake of fact in the drafting of the agreement. We review the judgment of the Court of Chancery granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint. The Court of Chancery determined that there were no material issues of fact that would enable any reasonable finder of fact to conclude
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975-05-19 · Published · cited 3× · 168 U.S. App. D.C. 92; 512 F.2d 1332
BAZELON, Chief Judge: Petitioners in these cases are customers of natural gas pipelines subject to the jurisdiction of the FPC. The three pipelines involved, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco),1 Southern Natural Gas Company (Southern),2 and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle),3 are experiencing systemwide shor
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002-03-13 · Published · cited 72× · 794 A.2d 1141
794 A.2d 1141 (2002) CERBERUS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Cerberus Partners, L.P., Pequod Investments, L.P., and Ultra Cerberus, Ltd., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. APOLLO MANAGEMENT, L.P. and Mobile Technology, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 131, 2001. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: November 27, 2001. Decided: March 13, 2002. Ronald A. B
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997-10-23 · Published · cited 15× · 982 F. Supp. 1138; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16733; 1997 WL 662997
982 F.Supp. 1138 (1997) DEE-K ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HEVEAFIL SDN. BHD., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-556-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 23, 1997. *1139 *1140 Joel Davidow, Sturgis M. Sobin, Joel W. Rogers, Ablondi, Fo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974-11-26 · Published · cited 1× · 167 U.S. App. D.C. 134; 511 F.2d 372; 1974 WL 333514
PER CURIAM: Oral argument in these three groups of consolidated appeals was heard on November 21, 1974. In addition to the issues presented on the merits of petition*138ers’ claims, we asked counsel in Consolidated Edison v. FPC to address themselves to a number of motions recently filed by petitioners, intervenors and the FPC, as respondent, in that case. We deal pre
District Court, D. Kansas · 1992-10-29 · Published · cited 33× · 810 F. Supp. 1127; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16827; 1992 WL 345057
810 F.Supp. 1127 (1992) Roger L. COMEAU; David L. Comeau; Charles G. Comeau; Rooks County Savings Association; and Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (as successor in interest to Rooks County Savings Association); and Rupp Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Terry RUPP; C.F. Rupp; Farmers National Bank; Alexander Grant & Co., Defendants, Grant Thornton (formerly Alexander Grant & Co., a partnership); and Fox & Compan