Cases

588 N.E.2d 427 (1992) 225 Ill. App.3d 477 167 Ill.Dec. 786 The PEOPLE ex rel. E. Allen BERNARDI, Director of the Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK et al., Defendants (Durocher Dock and Dredge Corporation, Defendant-Appellee). No. 2-91-0338. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. February

135 Ill. App.3d 580 (1985) 482 N.E.2d 114 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. E. ALLEN BERNARDI, Director of Labor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 84-0417. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed August 12, 1985. *581 Neil F.

443 P.2d 708 (1968) Lisa Marie BERNARDI, a minor by her father and next friend, Frank D. Bernardi, and Frank D. Bernardi, Plaintiffs in Error, v. COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado corporation, Dorothy Dravis and Charles L. Aumiller, Defendants in Error. No. 22143. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. July 15, 1968. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1968.

398 N.W.2d 7 (1986) In re the Marriage of Thomas Ray WENNDT, petitioner, Respondent, v. Joan Marie WENNDT, Appellant. No. C5-86-1299. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 23, 1986. Jeffrey J. Haberkorn, Haberkorn & Solien, Aitkin, for respondent. Richard A. Zimmerman, Ryan Ryan & Zimmerman, Aitkin, Guardian Ad Litem for the Minor Child. Cyri

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge. Eran Best has sued the City of Naperville, two Naperville police officers, and several television production companies on claims arising from her arrest and resulting involuntary appearance on the television show Female Forces. Best claims that her arrest and the show’s depiction of her personal information violated her

359 F.Supp.2d 13 (2005) Stephen PATTERSON and Woburn Fire Fighters Association, Local 971, I.A.F.F., Plaintiffs, v. Paul TORTOLANO, Chief of the City of Woburn Fire Department, and City of Woburn, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 04-12190-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 14, 2005. *14 Michael D. Badger, Mirick, O'

OPINION AND ORDER •REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency In-junctive .Relief (“Motion”), ECF No. 7, and accompanying Memorandum in Support. ECF No. 8. The Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the Defendants’ enforcement of FAQ 33, which would reduce a statutory payment adjustment to hospitals, like the Plaintiff, that serve a disproportionate share ■

Opinion by Senior Judge Barbieri, Onfrey Sulyma (Claimant) petitions for review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dismissing his claim petition under the occupational disease provisions of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 PS. §§1-1601.1. We affirm. Claimant was employed as a custodian for Mi

Matthias, J. The issue to be determined herein is, simply, the meaning and application of the clause, “then my said trustee shall * * * distribute the trust estate per stirpes among my heirs at law, according to the laws of descent and distribution now in force in the state of Ohio, which heirs at law shall be determined and distribution made as though my death had occurred at the time of the final termination of the trust hereby

SALMON, Judge. Section 8-1005(a)(2) of the Labor and Employment Article of the Maryland Code (1999 Repl. Yol.),1 with exceptions not here applicable, states that a claimant who otherwise is eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits is disqualified from receiving such benefits if the Secretary of the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (“DLLR”) finds that “the individual, without

641 N.E.2d 435 (1994) 161 Ill.2d 321 204 Ill.Dec. 211 BENEFICIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al. (Beneficial Development Corporation, Appellant) v. The CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK et al., Appellees. No. 75012. Supreme Court of Illinois. July 28, 1994. Rehearing Denied October 3, 1994.

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VACATING THE BANKRUPTCY COURT’S ORDER GRANTING SPECIAL PACA TRUST COUNSEL’S THIRD INTERIM APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is an appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting Special PACA Counsel Craig A. Stokes (“Special Counsel”) his Third and Final Fee Application brought by Appellants Kingdom Fresh Produce

OPINION OF THE COURT LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge. This case presents the question whether the Pennsylvania Steel Products Procurement Act (“Steel Act”), Act of March 3, 1978, P.L. 6, No. 3, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 73, §§ 1881-87, is unconstitutional. The grounds of challenging the Steel Act are several: it is contended that the Steel Act (1) is preempted by various federal statutes and executive agreements

128 Ill.2d 335 (1989) 538 N.E.2d 1146 THE CITY OF BURBANK, Appellant, v. THE ILLINOIS STATE LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al., Appellees. No. 67001. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed April 20, 1989. *336 *337 *338

NO. 4-95-0574 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Circuit Court of v. ) McLean County JAMES D. KIRK, ) No. 951668 Defendant-A

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

916 F.2d 903 12 ITRD 2265, 59 USLW 2292 TROJAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Kappe Associates, Inc., Appellants,v.COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Leroy S. Zimmerman,Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellees. No. 90-5057. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Aug. 10, 1990.Decided Oct. 24, 1990.

606 N.E.2d 837 (1992) 239 Ill. App.3d 414 179 Ill.Dec. 1005 BENEFICIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK et al., Defendants-Appellees (Tennyson Development Corporation et al., Plaintiffs). No. 2-91-1043. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. December 31, 1992.

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. This case was precipitated by a fire that damaged the home of plaintiffs Tim and Sheryl Pierce (the “Pierces”). Plaintiffs allege that the Village of Divernon, Illinois (the “Village”) negligently failed to provide an adequate supply of water to fight the fire. They also maintain that the Village deprived them of their property without due