⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bernard Hendricks”

Hendricks v. Statepublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2006-01-31 · Published · cited 10× · 2006 MT 22; 331 Mont. 47; 128 P.3d 1017; 2006 Mont. LEXIS 27
2006 MT 22 JOHN TICE HENDRICKS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent and Respondent. No. 05-108 Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs: December 7, 2005 Decided: January 31, 2006 For Appellant: Kristina Neal, Assistant Appellate Defender, Helena, Montana. For Respondent: Honorable Mike McGrath, Attorney General; C.
State v. Hendrickspublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2003-08-25 · Published · cited 45× · 2003 MT 223; 75 P.3d 1268; 317 Mont. 177; 2003 Mont. LEXIS 401
75 P.3d 1268 (2003) 2003 MT 223 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John Tice HENDRICKS, Defendant and Appellant. No. 02-510. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs May 8, 2003. Decided August 25, 2003. *1269 For Appellant: Kristina Guest, Appellate Defender, Helena, Mont
Kansas v. Hendrickspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-06-23 · Published · cited 2079× · 138 L. Ed. 2d 501; 117 S. Ct. 2072; 521 U.S. 346; 1997 U.S. LEXIS 3999
Justice Kennedy, concurring. I join the opinion of the Court in full- and add these additional comments. Though other issues were argued to us, as the action has matured it turns on whether the Kansas statute is an ex post facto law. A law enacted after commission of the offense and which punishes the offense by extending the term of confinement is a textbook example of an ex
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-04-17 · Published · cited 2× · 921 F.3d 690
Barrett, Circuit Judge. *691 Bernard Cherry appeals his conviction as a felon in possession of a firearm on the ground that the district court erred by not giving the jury his proposed "innocent possession" instruction. He also claims that the district court erred by not asking whether he wa
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
MARGIE HENDRICKS AND * NO. 2021-CA-0109 MYRTIS HENDRICKS WILLIAMS * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT WELLS FARGO INSURANCE, * STERICYCLE, INC., STATE OF LOUISIANA SHADRACK LONG, ORTEGAS ******* COLEMAN AND EAN HOLDINGS, LLC APPE
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
MARGIE HENDRICKS AND * NO. 2021-CA-0552 MYRTIS HENDRICKS WILLIAMS * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT WELLS FARGO INSURANCE, * STERICYCLE, INC., STATE OF LOUISIANA SHADRACK LONG, ORTEGAS ******* COLEMAN AND EAN HOLDINGS, LLC APPE
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2021-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-20-00039-CV ________________________ IN RE: THE COMMITMENT OF ANTHONY BERNARD WILEY On Appeal from the 89th District Court
People v. Hendrickspublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976-08-02 · Published · cited 10× · 353 N.E.2d 177; 41 Ill. App. 3d 178; 1976 Ill. App. LEXIS 2924
41 Ill. App.3d 178 (1976) 353 N.E.2d 177 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT HENDRICKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 62427. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed August 2, 1976. *179 James Geis and Lynn Sara Frackman, both of State Appellate Defe
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2016-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-15-00133-CR BRANDON BERNARD BATTLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 220th District Court Bosque County, Texas Trial Court No. CR 14972 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-06-28 · Published · cited 20× · 861 F.3d 459; 2017 WL 2784960; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11493
OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge • The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania charged Bernard Lambert as a co-conspirator with and accomplice to Aquil Tillman’s acts of murder, aggravated assault, and burglary. Their trial was joint. In preparation for trial, Tillman made statements to a testifying expert that implicated Lambert in Tillman’s criminal plan
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 06-15-00133-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/18/2015 3:17:35 PM DEBBIE AUTREY
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992-02-20 · Published · cited 7× · 594 So. 2d 1129; 1992 WL 30127
594 So.2d 1129 (1992) Rita HENDRICKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emmett HENDRICKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-853. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 20, 1992. Lunn, Irion, Johnson, Salley & Carlisle, Julia A. Mann, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant. Gahagan & Gahagan, Fred S. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellee. Bef
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 121 Fed. Cl. 687; 45 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20084; 2015 U.S. Claims LEXIS 526; 2015 WL 2058969
Temporary Takings Claim; U.S. Const, amend. V. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON LIABILITY REGARDING A TEMPORARY TAKING BY FLOODING BRADEN, Judge. On October 17, 2005, St. Bernard Parish, a governmental entity of the State of Louisiana, and owner of real property, together with private owners of real property, located either in St.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
VACATE and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 24, 2015. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00175-CV BERNARD PATRUSKY, Appellant V. KENNETH BLOOMBERG AND MARILYN BLOOMBERG,
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010-03-01 · Published · cited 49× · 424 B.R. 122; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 495; 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 236; 2010 WL 694211
424 B.R. 122 (2010) In re BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Debtor. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendant. No. 08-01789 (BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. March 1, 2010. *123 Baker & Hostetler LLP, by David Sheehan, Ma
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971-08-23 · Published · cited 31× · 447 F.2d 864
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff V-M Corporation is a Benton Harbor, Michigan, manufacturer of tape recorders, record players, and other electronic equipment. Defendant Bernard Distributing Company is a Peoria, Illinois, distributor of electronic equipment and floor coverings. In this diversity action, V-M sued Bernard for $26,333
Steward v. Statlerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007-11-01 · Published · cited 9× · 266 S.W.3d 710; 371 Ark. 351; 2007 Ark. LEXIS 571
266 S.W.3d 710 (2007) Alice STEWARD and Sonya Steward as Co-Special Administrators of the Estate of Charlotte Steward, Deceased, Appellants, v. Kristi STATLER, M.D., and Kim Davis, M.D., and St. Bernard's Medical Center, Appellees. No. 06-1306. Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 1, 2007. Rehearing Denied December 6, 2007.
District Court, D. Montana · 2002-10-08 · Published · cited 7× · 223 F. Supp. 2d 1173; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25665; 2002 WL 31246777
223 F.Supp.2d 1173 (2002) Evel KNIEVEL and Krystal Knievel, Plaintiffs, v. ESPN, INC., Defendant. CV 01-69-BU-DWM. United States District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division. October 8, 2002. *1174 Wade J. Dahood, Bernard J. "Ben" Everett, Knight, Dahood, McLean & Everett, Anaconda, MT, for Plaintiffs. Peter Michael Melo
Michigan Supreme Court · 1930-10-03 · Published · cited 6× · 232 N.W. 367; 251 Mich. 602; 1930 Mich. LEXIS 656
The bill herein was filed, in the Kent circuit, in January, 1928, to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage of $165,000, upon property in the city of Grand Rapids. The mortgagors appeared, raised no issue of amount due, but interposed the defense that plaintiff, a foreign corporation, not admitted to carry on business in this State, was carrying on business here in holding title to real property and in selling and conveying the same to defendants and taking the mortgage in suit, and, therefore,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996-04-10 · Published · cited 78× · 81 F.3d 304; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7452; 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,036; 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 825; 1996 WL 180727
JACOBS, Circuit Judge: “Title VII[ ] is a remedial scheme in which laypersons, rather than lawyers, are expected to initiate the process.” EEOC v Commercial Office Prods. Co., 486 U.S. 107, 124, 108 S.Ct. 1666, 1676, 100 L.Ed.2d 96 (1988). Layperson George Ford initiated the process under Title VII and the ADEA, alleging illegal discrimination by his employer.