Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Berman v. Milliman USA”
OPINION OF THE COURT Mazzarelli, J.E Flaintiffs1 (Cap Z) are four limited partnerships which together invested 100 million dollars in the stock of nonparty Superior National Insurance Group (Superior). The investment was made to help fund Superior’s purchase of the Business Insurance Group, Inc. (BIG), a set of four California workers’ compensation insurers, from Foundation He
Madsen, J. — WR Enterprises, Inc., (WRE) brought suit against the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) alleging four causes of action, two of which are the subject of this appeal. In the two relevant claims, WRE alleges (1) that the Department’s method for setting premium rates for worker’s compensation insurance exceeds its statutory authority under RCW 51.16.035 and decisions from this court, and (2) that the supplem
Bussie v. Allmerica Financial Corp.public domain
50 F.Supp.2d 59 (1999) Victor BUSSIE, Morley Morgana, Quentin Dawson, and Margaret Dawson, individually and as representatives of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALLMERICA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, SMA Financial Corporation, First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company, and Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-40204-NMG. United States District
53 P.3d 504 (2002) 147 Wash.2d 213 WR ENTERPRISES, INC., Arthur W. Weatherford and Glennyce R. Rediger, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent. No. 70377-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued February 26, 2002. Decided September 5, 2002. Steve Berman, Erin Flory, Jon Schneidler, Seattle, for A
In re MetLife Demutualization Litigationpublic domain
Memorandum and Order on Admissibility of New York Insurance Superintendent’s Opinion JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction...............................................................222 II. Facts.....................................................................223 A. MetLife’s Plan of Reorgan
In Re Metlife Demutualization Litigationpublic domain
689 F.Supp.2d 297 (2010) In re METLIFE DEMUTUALIZATION LITIGATION. No. 00 CV 2258. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 12, 2010. *304 Stamell & Schager, LLP by Jared B. Stamell, Esq., New York, NY, Mandel & Mandel, LLP, by David S. Mandel, Esq., Miami, FL, Berman DeValerio, by Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr., Esq., San F