Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Berlin v. Krieger”
Pecora v. Berlinpublic domain
62 So.3d 28 (2011) Arlene PECORA, Appellant, v. Bret BERLIN, Signature Gardens, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, Deux Michel, Inc., a Florida corporation, Signature Grand, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, and Grand Partners, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees. No. 3D10-2983. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 30, 2011. Rehear
State v. Kriegerpublic domain
163 Wis.2d 241 (1991) 471 N.W.2d 599 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William A. KRIEGER, Defendant-Appellant.[] No. 90-1771-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs March 15, 1991. Decided May 1, 1991. *246 On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the ca
Opinion HUFFMAN, J. In 2007, defendants and appellants, the City of National City and its community development commission (the Commission or CDC; together, the City), approved an amendment to its 1995 redevelopment plan, ordinance No. 2007-2295 (Amendment), that extended the time period authorized by the plan for the use of eminent domain powers within a 30
170 Cal.App.4th 416 (2009) COMMUNITY YOUTH ATHLETIC CENTER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D052584. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. January 22, 2009. *420 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, Richard M. Segal, C. J. Martin; Institute for Justice
Lopez v. Merced County, Cal.public domain
473 F.Supp.2d 1072 (2007) Felix M. LOPEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. No. 1:06-cv-01526 OWW DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 26, 2007. *1073 Brian J. Sutherland, Pro Hac Vice, Brian J. Sutherland, Attorney at Law, Everett, WA, Joaquin Guadalupe Avila, Law Office
Abarca v. Franklin County Water Districtpublic domain
761 F.Supp.2d 1007 (2011) ABARCA, Raul Valencia, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, Defendants. No. 1:07-CV-0388-OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 5, 2011. *1011 Brett Lee Runyon, Heather Sharon Cohen, Michael Edward Lehman, Marderosian, Runyon, Cercone, Lehman & Armo, Fresno,
Dooley v. United Statespublic domain
22-995 Dooley v. United States IN THE United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM, 2022 ARGUED: APRIL 20, 2023 DECIDED: OCTOBER 5, 2023 No. 22-995 KEVIN DOOLEY,
Northfield Insurance Co. v. Civic Center Hotel, LLCpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Northfield Insurance Company (“North-field”) brought this action for declaratory relief against defendants Civic Center Hotel, LLC; Balvantsinh “Bill” Thakor; and U.A. Local 38 Pension Trust Fund (collectively, “Civic Center Defendants”) concerning its obligation to provide insurance coverage
Tnaib v. Document Technologies, LLCpublic domain
450 F.Supp.2d 87 (2006) Abderrahim TNAIB, Plaintiff, v. DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., and James McGuire,[1] Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-1825(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 21, 2006. *88 Howard Norman Berliner, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. *8
Clark v. Bureau of Prisonspublic domain
407 F.Supp.2d 127 (2005) Clint E. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 03-0859HHK. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 14, 2005. Thomas Richard Lotterman, Joshua M. Bobeck, Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. *128 Marina Utgoff Brasw
Thomas v. Shearpublic domain
Linda Thomas v. David Shear No. 2669, Sept. Term, 2018 Opinion by Leahy, J. Motion for Summary Judgment > Contradictory Affidavit or Statement The trial court correctly determined that affidavits of the plaintiff’s experts were materially inconsistent with the prior deposition testimony of the experts and should be disregarded pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-501(e). The affidavits, in which the experts opined that kidney stones, and not the surgical clip, caused Ms. Thomas’s hydronephrosis in 2006
Harcztark v. Drive Variety, Inc.public domain
Crane J., dissents and votes to reverse and to deny that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to vacate their default in answering the complaint and for leave to serve and file a late answer and to remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings. In this trip-and-fall case, the plaintiff commenced the action on February 21, 2003 and effected service through the Secretary of S
Williams v. Gayepublic domain
NGUYEN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority allows the Gayes to accomplish what no one has before: copyright a musical style. "Blurred Lines" and "Got to Give It Up" are not objectively similar. They differ in melody, harmony, and rhythm. Yet by refusing to compare the two works, the majority establishes a dangerous precedent that strikes a devastating blow to future musicians and composers everywhere. While
Steamfitters Local v. Erie Insurancepublic domain
Steamfitters Local Union No. 602 v. Erie Insurance Exchange, et al.; Steamfitters Local Union No. 602 v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al., No. 40, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. TORT LIABILITY – PROPERTY OWNER’S DUTY OF CARE TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER TO MAINTAIN PROPERTY IN A MANNER TO AVOID RISK OF FIRE. For at least the past 80 years, this Court has recognized that ownership, operation, and maintenance of property comes with a common law duty to use reasonable care so as n
Pharrell Williams v. Frankie Gayepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual; No. 15-56880 CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR., an individual; ROBIN THICKE, an individual, DBA I D.C. No. Like’em Thicke Music, 2:13-cv-06004- Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants- JAK-AGR Appellants, and ORDER AND AMENDED MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH
Baumgardner v. Inco Alloys International, Inc.public domain
746 F.Supp. 623 (1990) L.E. BAUMGARDNER, Donald C. Dunkle, W. Jack Jeffrey, Vernon A. Closser, W.E. Meadows, Jr., and William Halley, Plaintiffs, v. INCO ALLOYS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Bankers Trust Company, Inco Limited, the Board of Administration for Retirement Savings Plan of Inco Limited and Subsidiaries, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3:89-0560. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington
Pharrell Williams v. Frankie Gayepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual; No. 15-56880 CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR., an individual; ROBIN THICKE, an individual, DBA I D.C. No. Like’em Thicke Music, 2:13-cv-06004- Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants- JAK-AGR Appellants, and OPINION MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH PUBLISHING, INC.; STAR TRAK ENTERTAINMENT; INTE
State v. Fosnowpublic domain
240 Wis.2d 699 (2000) 2001 WI App 2 624 N.W.2d 883 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dennis R. FOSNOW, Defendant-Appellant.[] No. 00-0122. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs December 7, 2000. Decided December 21, 2000. *701 On
Collett v. Socialist Peoples' Libyan Arab Jamahiriyapublic domain
362 F.Supp.2d 230 (2005) Elaine L. COLLETT et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOCIALIST PEOPLES' LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-2103 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 24, 2005. *231 *232 *233 John Joseph Mc
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Fordpublic domain
HARRELL, J. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This is a companion case1 brought by residents of Jacksonville, Maryland,2 against Exxon Mobil Corporation (Petition*436er)3 for an underground gasoline leak from an Exxon Mobil-owned gasoline service station, located at the corner of