⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Berlin v. Krieger”

Pecora v. Berlinpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-03-30 · Published · cited 1× · 62 So. 3d 28; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4338; 2011 WL 1135264
62 So.3d 28 (2011) Arlene PECORA, Appellant, v. Bret BERLIN, Signature Gardens, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, Deux Michel, Inc., a Florida corporation, Signature Grand, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, and Grand Partners, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees. No. 3D10-2983. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 30, 2011. Rehear
State v. Kriegerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991-05-01 · Published · cited 41× · 471 N.W.2d 599; 163 Wis. 2d 241; 1991 Wisc. App. LEXIS 816
163 Wis.2d 241 (1991) 471 N.W.2d 599 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William A. KRIEGER, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 90-1771-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs March 15, 1991. Decided May 1, 1991. *246 On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the ca
California Court of Appeal · 2013-10-30 · Published · cited 30× · 220 Cal. App. 4th 1385; 164 Cal. Rptr. 3d 644; 2013 WL 5823767; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 876
Opinion HUFFMAN, J. In 2007, defendants and appellants, the City of National City and its community development commission (the Commission or CDC; together, the City), approved an amendment to its 1995 redevelopment plan, ordinance No. 2007-2295 (Amendment), that extended the time period authorized by the plan for the use of eminent domain powers within a 30
California Court of Appeal · 2009-01-22 · Published · cited 7× · 170 Cal. App. 4th 416; 87 Cal. Rptr. 3d 903; 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 66
170 Cal.App.4th 416 (2009) COMMUNITY YOUTH ATHLETIC CENTER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D052584. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. January 22, 2009. *420 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, Richard M. Segal, C. J. Martin; Institute for Justice
District Court, E.D. California · 2007-01-26 · Published · cited 0× · 473 F. Supp. 2d 1072; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5993; 2007 WL 210574
473 F.Supp.2d 1072 (2007) Felix M. LOPEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. No. 1:06-cv-01526 OWW DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 26, 2007. *1073 Brian J. Sutherland, Pro Hac Vice, Brian J. Sutherland, Attorney at Law, Everett, WA, Joaquin Guadalupe Avila, Law Office
District Court, E.D. California · 2011-01-05 · Published · cited 14× · 761 F. Supp. 2d 1007; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1603; 2011 WL 140371
761 F.Supp.2d 1007 (2011) ABARCA, Raul Valencia, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, Defendants. No. 1:07-CV-0388-OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 5, 2011. *1011 Brett Lee Runyon, Heather Sharon Cohen, Michael Edward Lehman, Marderosian, Runyon, Cercone, Lehman & Armo, Fresno,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-10-05 · Published · cited 0×
22-995 Dooley v. United States IN THE United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM, 2022 ARGUED: APRIL 20, 2023 DECIDED: OCTOBER 5, 2023 No. 22-995 KEVIN DOOLEY,
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-03-08 · Published · cited 3× · 239 F. Supp. 3d 1163; 2017 WL 914287; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33328
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Northfield Insurance Company (“North-field”) brought this action for declaratory relief against defendants Civic Center Hotel, LLC; Balvantsinh “Bill” Thakor; and U.A. Local 38 Pension Trust Fund (collectively, “Civic Center Defendants”) concerning its obligation to provide insurance coverage
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-09-21 · Published · cited 29× · 450 F. Supp. 2d 87; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67365; 2006 WL 2699022
450 F.Supp.2d 87 (2006) Abderrahim TNAIB, Plaintiff, v. DOCUMENT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., and James McGuire,[1] Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-1825(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 21, 2006. *88 Howard Norman Berliner, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. *8
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 407 F. Supp. 2d 127; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34046; 2005 WL 3213908
407 F.Supp.2d 127 (2005) Clint E. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 03-0859HHK. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 14, 2005. Thomas Richard Lotterman, Joshua M. Bobeck, Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. *128 Marina Utgoff Brasw
Thomas v. Shearpublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020-08-27 · Published · cited 4× · 236 A.3d 781; 247 Md. App. 430
Linda Thomas v. David Shear No. 2669, Sept. Term, 2018 Opinion by Leahy, J. Motion for Summary Judgment > Contradictory Affidavit or Statement The trial court correctly determined that affidavits of the plaintiff’s experts were materially inconsistent with the prior deposition testimony of the experts and should be disregarded pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-501(e). The affidavits, in which the experts opined that kidney stones, and not the surgical clip, caused Ms. Thomas’s hydronephrosis in 2006
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005-09-06 · Published · cited 97× · 21 A.D.3d 876; 800 N.Y.S.2d 613
Crane J., dissents and votes to reverse and to deny that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to vacate their default in answering the complaint and for leave to serve and file a late answer and to remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings. In this trip-and-fall case, the plaintiff commenced the action on February 21, 2003 and effected service through the Secretary of S
Williams v. Gayepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-03-21 · Published · cited 77× · 895 F.3d 1106
NGUYEN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority allows the Gayes to accomplish what no one has before: copyright a musical style. "Blurred Lines" and "Got to Give It Up" are not objectively similar. They differ in melody, harmony, and rhythm. Yet by refusing to compare the two works, the majority establishes a dangerous precedent that strikes a devastating blow to future musicians and composers everywhere. While
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020-07-27 · Published · cited 42× · 233 A.3d 59; 469 Md. 704
Steamfitters Local Union No. 602 v. Erie Insurance Exchange, et al.; Steamfitters Local Union No. 602 v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al., No. 40, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. TORT LIABILITY – PROPERTY OWNER’S DUTY OF CARE TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER TO MAINTAIN PROPERTY IN A MANNER TO AVOID RISK OF FIRE. For at least the past 80 years, this Court has recognized that ownership, operation, and maintenance of property comes with a common law duty to use reasonable care so as n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual; No. 15-56880 CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR., an individual; ROBIN THICKE, an individual, DBA I D.C. No. Like’em Thicke Music, 2:13-cv-06004- Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants- JAK-AGR Appellants, and ORDER AND AMENDED MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1990-09-13 · Published · cited 8× · 746 F. Supp. 623; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13212; 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1808; 1990 WL 144281
746 F.Supp. 623 (1990) L.E. BAUMGARDNER, Donald C. Dunkle, W. Jack Jeffrey, Vernon A. Closser, W.E. Meadows, Jr., and William Halley, Plaintiffs, v. INCO ALLOYS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Bankers Trust Company, Inco Limited, the Board of Administration for Retirement Savings Plan of Inco Limited and Subsidiaries, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3:89-0560. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-03-21 · Published · cited 11× · 885 F.3d 1150
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual; No. 15-56880 CLIFFORD HARRIS, JR., an individual; ROBIN THICKE, an individual, DBA I D.C. No. Like’em Thicke Music, 2:13-cv-06004- Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants- JAK-AGR Appellants, and OPINION MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH PUBLISHING, INC.; STAR TRAK ENTERTAINMENT; INTE
State v. Fosnowpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000-12-21 · Published · cited 32× · 2001 WI App 2; 624 N.W.2d 883; 240 Wis. 2d 699; 2000 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1199
240 Wis.2d 699 (2000) 2001 WI App 2 624 N.W.2d 883 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dennis R. FOSNOW, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 00-0122. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs December 7, 2000. Decided December 21, 2000. *701 On
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-03-24 · Published · cited 13× · 362 F. Supp. 2d 230; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5068; 2005 WL 724443
362 F.Supp.2d 230 (2005) Elaine L. COLLETT et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOCIALIST PEOPLES' LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-2103 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 24, 2005. *231 *232 *233 John Joseph Mc
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013-02-26 · Published · cited 33× · 2013 Md. LEXIS 695; 433 Md. 426; 71 A.3d 105
HARRELL, J. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This is a companion case1 brought by residents of Jacksonville, Maryland,2 against Exxon Mobil Corporation (Petition*436er)3 for an underground gasoline leak from an Exxon Mobil-owned gasoline service station, located at the corner of