Cases

McDonald, j. | ¡¡This is an appeal from a district court summary judgment finding a school bus driver 100 percent at fault for a three-vehicle traffic accident. After a de novo review, we reverse the summary judgment and remand the matter to the district court for further proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The accident at issue occurred on January 15, 2013, in the westb

996 A.2d 1262 (2010) Linda S. PERRY, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Kristin M. BERKLEY, Marie M. Rinehart, Harold M. Williams, and Nationwide Insurance Company, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 445, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: April 13, 2010. Decided: May 11, 2010. *1263 Michael I. Silverman, Esqu

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Opinion HALLER, J. Tomatoes Extraordinaire, Inc., doing business as Specialty Produce (Specialty), sued Wellington, Inc., doing business as Jack’s La Jolla (Jack’s), and its controlling officer, William J. Berkley, for failure to pay outstanding invoices for produce supplied by Specialty to Jack’s. After a court trial, Berkley was found personally liable for Specialty’s damages. This personal liability was base

507 F.Supp.2d 692 (2007) William Josef BERKLEY, Petitioner, v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. No. EP-06-CV-111-FM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. August 24, 2007. *693 *694

DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on cross motions for partial summary judgment brought by Plaintiff Berkley National Insurance Company ("Berkley") (Doc. No. 31) and Defendant Janice Franklin, as trustee for the heirs and next-of-kin of William Franklin, deceased ("Franklin Estate") (Doc. No. 27). For the reasons set forth below, the Court gr

Opinion VERTEFEUILLE, J. The plaintiffs, William Berkley and Marjorie Berkley, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the assessment by the defendant, the commissioner of revenue services, *763against the plaintiffs of an additional $393,263.01 in state income taxes for the 1994 taxable year. The principal i

OPINION HORN, Judge. This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for approval of the Settlement Agreement between the United States and approximately 620 former junior officers who held reserve commissions in the United States Air Force. Within four days of the filing of this opinion, the parties shall file a joint status report informing the court of the exact number and names of those plai

OPINION HORN, Judge. This case arises out of an Air Force Secretary’s Memorandum of Instruction given to an Air Force Reduction-In-Force (RIF) Board. Plaintiffs claim that the Memorandum violated their rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution by allegedly requiring the Board to consider race and gender as factors in making its decision. The Memorandum, however, does not include a

PROST, Circuit Judge. This is a military pay class action case brought on behalf of officers of the United States Air Force terminated pursuant to a 1993 Reduction in Force (“RIF”). The basis of their complaint is that the formal instructions governing selection for involuntary termination required different treatment of officers based on their race or gender, thereby violating the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amen

OPINION HORN, Judge. FACTS Plaintiffs, Ronald F. Berkley, Michael C. Hall, Forrest Joe Lykins, Jr., Leonard H. Mattingly, Jr., Thomas William Stanley, Mark Stephen Welte, Mark E. LaFlamme, David Paul Wilson, Michael H. Deal, Douglas Clayton Kinneard and James B. Freeman, Jr., brought this action on behalf of them*226s

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 134 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Orion Tyler Berkley, Defendant and Appellant No. 20240351 Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Benjamen J. Johnson, Judge. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Opin

567 A.2d 915 (1989) STATE of Maine v. William BERKLEY a/k/a William Berkley Strong. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued November 2, 1989. Decided December 11, 1989. James E. Tierney, Atty. Gen., Garry L. Greene (orally), Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, for plaintiff. Wayne P. Libhart (orally), Ellsworth, for defendant. Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS

FILED APR 17 2020 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT ORDERED PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN, Judges HALL, MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ and Senior Judge PHILLIPS joined. Senior Judge PHILLIPS wrote a special concurring opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN and Judge MURNAGHAN joined. Judge WIDENER wrote a dissenting opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judge RUSSELL and Judge

Gerald Austin McHugh, United States District Judge This is an employment discrimination case brought by a former employee in the linen department of Temple University Hospital, Inc. [hereinafter "Temple"]. Plaintiff Berkley Williams was terminated after the manager who hired him observed him out of his work area and playing a video game on his cellphone while still on the clock. Plaintiff contends that, within his department, employ

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,326 WILLIAM BERKLEY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE TRIAL COURT’S RULING ON A MOTION FILED IN CAUSE NO. 20000D5705-243-1 IN THE 243 RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT EL PASO COUN

BYRNES, Judge. Defendant was convicted of cruelty to juveniles, a violation of R.S. 14:93 and sentenced to eighteen months in Parish Prison. This sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on three years active probation with special conditions. Defendant has appealed her conviction, assigning as error the sufficiency of the evidence against her. STATEMENT OF FACTS On March 2,1981, at ap

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,326

63 F.3d 295 64 USLW 2104 William BERKLEY, Jr.; Carrie L. Chance; Allen R. Copley;Alfred J. Carey; Harmon H. Marks; Basil S.Scott; William F. Thaxton, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The COMMON COUNCIL OF the CITY OF CHARLESTON, Defendant-Appellee.Regina Alexander, Amicus Curiae. No. 94-1121. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.