⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Berkley v. Lawson”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 190 So. 3d 694; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7295; 2016 WL 2760170
PER CURIAM. Berkley Whitfield appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for DNA testing, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. The trial court found the motion to be facially sufficient, but' summarily denied it after receiving the State’s response. How *695
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-04-17 · Published · cited 5× · 52 Fed. Cl. 881; 287 F.3d 1076; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7223; 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,082; 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1066; 2002 WL 654368
PROST, Circuit Judge. This is a military pay class action case brought on behalf of officers of the United States Air Force terminated pursuant to a 1993 Reduction in Force (“RIF”). The basis of their complaint is that the formal instructions governing selection for involuntary termination required different treatment of officers based on their race or gender, thereby violating the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amen
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2024-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 TN WC 72
FILED Oct 01, 2024 07:00 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2000-08-29 · Published · cited 6× · 112 F. Supp. 2d 616; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12673; 2000 WL 1251904
112 F.Supp.2d 616 (2000) Brent LAWSON, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. CA 3:95-CV-2614-R. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 29, 2000. *617 Maureen Noble Armour, Ashley Wilkes Warren, Dallas, TX, Adam G. Schachter, Hitchery Law Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff. Dolena T.
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008-12-17 · Published · cited 18× · 594 F. Supp. 2d 789; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105952; 2008 WL 5411189
594 F.Supp.2d 789 (2008) Sidney HIGH, personal representative of the Estate of Vunies B. High, deceased, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL SENIOR LIVING PROERTIES 2—HEATHERWOOD, INC., Defendants. Case No. 08-13066. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 17, 2008. *792 Jules B. Olsman, Stephanie L. Arndt Olsm
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida MONDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2017 CASE NO.: SC16-547 Lower Tribunal No(s).: 5D16-516; 492013CF000612XXXAXX LARRY DARNELL PERRY vs. STATE OF FLORIDA Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Respondent’s Motion for Cl
Larry v. Powerskipublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015-12-07 · Published · cited 7× · 148 F. Supp. 3d 584; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163456; 2015 WL 8005929
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Yolanda Larry was fired from her job as a patient representative at Flint, Michigan’s Hurley Medical Center. The hospital said it terminated Larry for improperly accessing patient medical records i
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0354p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HRT ENTERPRISES, │ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appe
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2021-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ELIA COMPANIES, LLC, FOR PUBLICATION January 21, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellant,
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 229 So. 3d 1116
PER CURIAM. This matter.is before the Court for consideration of the out-of-cycle report of The Florida Bar’s Criminal Procedure Rules Committee seeking. clarification of the most, recent amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.192 (Motions for Rehearing). See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(e). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. Florida Rule
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
12/17/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 25, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRYAN ANTHONY CAPPS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 120093 Steven W. Sword, Judge _______________
Supreme Court of Florida · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 242 So. 3d 317
PER CURIAM. *318 This matter is before the Court for consideration of the out-of-cycle report of The Florida Bar's Criminal Procedure Rules Committee (Committee), proposing an amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220 (Discovery). See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 229 So. 3d 1116
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC17-1522 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.192. [November 9, 2017] PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the out-of-cycle report of The Florida Bar’s Criminal Procedure Rules Committee seeking clarifi
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 225 So. 3d 220; 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797; 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1807; 2017 WL 3910751
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-1062 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.010, AND FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.440. [September 7, 2017] PER CURIAM. The Court has for consideration proposed amendments to the Florida Rules of Judi
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022-07-06 · Published · cited 0×
Judicial Merit Selection Commission Sen. Luke A. Rankin, Chairman Erin B. Crawford, Chief Counsel Sen. Ronnie A. Sabb Emma Dean, Counsel Sen. Scott Talley Rep. J. Todd Rutherford Rep. Jeffrey E. “Jeff” Johnson Rep. Micajah P. “Micah” Caskey, IV Hope Blackley Lucy Grey McIver Andrew N. Safran J.P. “Pete” Strom Jr.
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003-01-23 · Published · cited 22× · 655 N.W.2d 791; 253 Mich. App. 555
Fitzgerald, P.J. (concurring). I concur in the result reached by the majority, albeit for different reasons. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that defendant Lawson was negligent in his operation of the Flint Fire Department paramedic unit by failing to follow standard emergency vehicle protocol in approaching and entering an intersection. He alleged that Lawson’s negligence caused Thomas Kells to abruptly
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968-08-19 · Published · cited 0× · 294 F. Supp. 228; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9971
MEMORANDUM ORDER KELLAM, District' Judge. Plaintiff, the owner of the Trawler HI-WAL, filed this action against the Trawler SEA-RAMBLER, and her owners, to recover damages in the amount of $40,000.00, alleged to have been sustained when the HI-WAL sank as a result *230of a collision between it and the SEA-RAMBLER, due to the alleged fault of defend
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0353p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HRT ENTERPRISES, │ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appe
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
09/10/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 10, 2018 Session XCALIBER INTERNATIONAL LTD., LLC v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 17-0630-1 Claudia C. Bonnyman, Chancellor
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010-01-08 · Published · cited 27× · 455 Mass. 706; 919 N.E.2d 685; 2010 Mass. LEXIS 7
Botsford, J. Following a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendant was convicted of felony-murder in the first degree of Scott Michael Kelly.1 In this direct appeal from his convictions, the defendant argues error in the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of certain deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) test results because the testing, which exhausted the only DNA samples available, was conducted