Cases

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1286-22 MIST PHARMACEUTICALS, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION LLC, July 9, 2024 APPELLATE DIVISION Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BE

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Joseph R. Goodwin, United States District Judge Pending before the court are the plaintiff Arch Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary. Judgment [ECF , No. 94] (“Arch’s Motion”), the plaintiff Steadfast Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 92] (“Steadfast’s Motion”; together, with Arch’s Motion, “the plaintiffs’ Motions”), and the defendants Berkley Natio

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Mist Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Berkley Insurance Company (A-34-24) (089689) Argued October 9, 2025 -- Decided May 11, 2026 JUSTICE PATTERSON, writing for the Court. In this appeal, the Court considers

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HARMAN INTERNATIONAL ) INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N22C-05-098 ) PRW CCLD ILLINOIS NATIONAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ) and BERKLEY INSURANCE )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HARMAN INTERNATIONAL ) INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N22C-05-098 ) PRW CCLD ILLINOIS NATIONAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ) and BERKLEY INSURANCE )

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (“Philadelphia”) appeals the grant of summary judgment to Berkley Regional Insurance Company (“Berkley”). We REVERSE and REMAND. I. Facts As the district court aptly characterized it, this case is “factually straightforward, [but] contractually complex.” Berk

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. G-W Management Services, LLC (“GW”), as prime contractor, entered into a contract (“Prime Contract”) with the United States of America (the “Government”) for a renovation project at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda (the “Project”).1 Use Plaintiff Eastern Waterproofing & Restoration Compan

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: This action arises out of an insurance coverage dispute between Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) and Defendant The Fairbanks Company. The Fairbanks Company is a manufacturing company that has been named in several lawsuits alleging injuries from exposure to asbestos. Liberty Mutual is one of seven insurance companies

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CONTINENTAL ) CASUALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, NAVIGATORS ) INSURANCE COMPANY, RSUI ) INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ) BERKLEY INSURANCE ) COMPANY,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CONTINENTAL ) CASUALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, NAVIGATORS ) INSURANCE COMPANY, RSUI ) INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ) BERKLEY INSURANCE ) COMPANY,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AEARO TECHNOLOGIES ) LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N23C-06-255-SKR CCLD ) ACE AMERICAN ) INSURANCE COMPANY, et ) al. )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CONTINENTAL ) CASUALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, NAVIGATORS ) INSURANCE COMPANY, RSUI ) INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ) BERKLEY INSURANCE ) COMPANY,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3075 ASTELLAS US HOLDING, INC. and ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United Stat

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC., § TALBOT UNDERWRITING § SERVICES (US) LTD., FACTORY § MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,§ AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY, § No. 444, 2019 LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE § INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY § SURPLUS INSURANCE § Court Below: Superior Court of the CORPORATION, ACE AMERICAN§ State of Delaware INSURANCE CO.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1139 Doc: 43 Filed: 03/04/2026 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1139 In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. ------------------------------ DONAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: CVS OPIOID § INSURANCE LITIGATION § No. 482, 2024 § § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. N22C-02-045 Submitted: June 25, 2025

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: CVS OPIOID ) Consol. C.A. No. N22C-02-045 INSURANCE LITIGATION ) PRW CCLD Submitted: August 16, 2024 Decided: August 20, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Upon Insurers’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment GRANTED Upon CVS’s Motion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: CVS OPIOID ) Consol. C.A. No. N22C-02-045 INSURANCE LITIGATION ) PRW CCLD Submitted: August 16, 2024 Decided: August 20, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Upon Insurers’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment GRANTED Upon CVS’s Motion

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on motions for summary judgment by defendant First Mercury Insurance Company (“First Mercury”) (DE 110); plaintiff Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company. _ (“Harleys-ville”) (DE 111); defendant Assurance Company of America (“Assurance”) (DE 117); and defendant First Financial Insurance Company (“First Financial”) (DE 126). Also befo

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: CVS OPIOID ) Consol. C.A. No. N22C-02-045 INSURANCE LITIGATION ) PRW CCLD Submitted: July 24, 2023 Decided: August 25, 2023 OPINION AND ORDER Upon Insurers’ and Joining Insurers’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment GRANTED Garrett B. Moritz, E