⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Beres v. Daily Journal Corporation”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-01-21 · Published · cited 15× · 105 F.3d 1281
105 F.3d 1281 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 454, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 715BAY VIEW, INC., on behalf of AK NATIVE VILLAGE CORPORATIONS;Lewis Olsen, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.AHTNA, INC.; Artic Slope Regional; Bering Straits RegionalCorp.; Calista Corp.; Chugach Alaska Corp.; Cook InletRegion; Koniag, Inc.; Sealaska Corp.; The Aleut Corp.;Roy S. Ewan; Jacob Adams; Jack Carpenter; Roy M.Huhndorf; Frank Pagano;
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-10-02 · Published · cited 17× · 67 F.3d 813
67 F.3d 813 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7696, 95 Daily JournalD.A.R. 13,176NOME ESKIMO COMMUNITY; Native Village of Solomon; KingIsland Native Community, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Bruce BABBITT, Secretary of the Interior, and the UnitedStates Department of the Interior, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35668. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-03-12 · Published · cited 10× · 138 F.3d 1281; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1804; 98 Daily Journal DAR 2513; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417; 1998 WL 106108
138 F.3d 1281 125 Ed. Law Rep. 22, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1804,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2513 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. NORTON SOUND HEALTHCORPORATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BERING STRAIT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-35827. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1997.<
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996-05-22 · Published · cited 39× · 84 F.3d 343
84 F.3d 343 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3590, 96 Daily JournalD.A.R. 5828ALLIANCE AGAINST IFQs; Lady Blackie, Inc.; Mako Haggerty;Mathew Donohoe; Nancy L. Lande; Adrian Lecornu; HowardCarlough; Jere Murray; Paul K. Seaton; William Sullivan;Don Hall, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Ronald H. BROWN, Secretary of Commerce; Clarence G.Pautzke, Executive Director North Pacific FisheryManagement Council; Western Alaska
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996-10-23 · Published · cited 14× · 98 F.3d 514; 96 Daily Journal DAR 12893; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7787; 1997 A.M.C. 92; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27442
98 F.3d 514 1997 A.M.C. 92, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7787,96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,893 Vilmos FUSZEK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ROYAL KING FISHERIES, INC., a Washington corporation; FtRoyal King, # 592205; and Royal Seafoods, Inc., aWashington corporation, Defendants-Appellees.Vilmos FUSZEK, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ROYAL KING FISHERIES, INC., a Washington corporation; RoyalSeafoods Inc.,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-04-24 · Published · cited 3× · 143 F.3d 1172; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3082; 1998 A.M.C. 1608; 98 Daily Journal DAR 4237; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7852
143 F.3d 1172 1998 A.M.C. 1608, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3082,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4237 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANIES; Compagnie D'AssurancesMaritimes Aeriennes Terrestres; Great American InsuranceCompany; Aetna Insurance Company; Phoenix InsuranceCompany, a foreign Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.BIG BLUE FISHERIES, INC., an Alaska Corporation,Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-05-26 · Published · cited 9× · 55 F.3d 1420; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3917; 95 Daily Journal DAR 6732; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12698
CANBY, Circuit Judge: I F.H. and her son K.W. appeal a district court order granting St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action. The district court held that an insurance policy St. Paul issued to Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Alaska (BB/BS) does not provide coverage to BB/BS executive director Ke
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999-12-07 · Published · cited 1× · 197 F.3d 992; 99 Daily Journal DAR 12359; 2000 A.M.C. 191; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9593; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32018
197 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 1999) ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC.; AAS-DMP MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP; KODIAK MARINE PROTEIN, INC., General Partner AAS-DMP; DALMOREPRODUCT, Holding Company; SHIN NIHON GLOBAL COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.RAYCHEM CORPORATION, Defendant-third-party-plaintiff-Appellee, and MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee,v.MARINE ELECTRIC, INC., Third-party-Defendant.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-09-03 · Published · cited 8× · 192 F.3d 1220; 99 Daily Journal DAR 9355; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7297; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20993
192 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 1999) GLENN OLIVER, Individually and as Representative of the class of Other-at-Large Shareholders in Alaska Native Regional Corporations and Village Corporations, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SEALASKA CORP.; COOK INLET REGION, INC.; NANA CORPORATION; KONIAG, INC.; DOYON, LTD.; CHUGACH ALASKA CORP.; CALISTA CORP.; BRISTOL BAY NATIVE CORPORATION; BERING STRAITS NATIVE CORP.; ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORP.; THE ALEUT CORP.; AHTN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-01-21 · Published · cited 0× · 105 F.3d 1281; 97 Daily Journal DAR 715; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 454; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1367
Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI. OPINION KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge. We decide whether a court may strike down a statute as violating the takings clause when the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, provides an avenue for obtaining compensation. I Congress giveth and it taketh away. At most, that’s what happened here to appellants, an Alaska native village c
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-10-02 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 Ohio 4383
[Cite as Gullie v. Cuyahoga Cty., 2014-Ohio-4383.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100927 KIM GULLIE PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.
Iino v. Spalterpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-08-07 · Published · cited 10× · 298 F.3d 1090; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7138; 2002 A.M.C. 2135; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8969; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15775
298 F.3d 1090 NORTHERN QUEEN INC., an Alaska corporation, as owner and operator of the F/V LIN J, Official No. 538018, for exoneration from or limitation of liability, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kathryn KINNEAR, the Estate of Blake Kinnear, Claimant-Appellant. No. 00-36093. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 13, 2002.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-12-11 · Published · cited 2× · 73 F.3d 884; 95 Daily Journal DAR 16335; 1996 A.M.C. 342; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9371; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35039
73 F.3d 884 1996 A.M.C. 342, 64 USLW 2394, 95Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9371,95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,335 In the Matter of the Petition of F/V CAROLYN JEAN, INC., forLimitation of or Exoneration From Liability,Petitioner-Appellee,v.Robert J. SCHMITT, for the Estate of Timothy SCHMITT,Claimant-Appellant. No. 94-35583. United States Court of Appeal
State v. Gojcajpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005-10-20 · Published · cited 5× · 395 F. Supp. 2d 541; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24358; 2005 WL 2678923
395 F.Supp.2d 541 (2005) MARCUS & MILLICHAP REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT BROKERAGE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Dan SKEETERS, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 3:04CV-157-R. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. October 20, 2005. *542 *543 *544
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-04-24 · Published · cited 10× · 247 F.3d 953; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3226; 2001 A.M.C. 1637; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3981; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7398
247 F.3d 953 (9th Cir. 2001) JOSEPH ORSINI, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.O/S SEABROOKE O.N., 614,410 her engines, gear, tackle furniture and appurtenances in rem; SEABROOKE, INC., an Alaska corporation; WILLARD S. FERRIS, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-35588 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted February 15, 2001,Filed April 24, 2001<
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-01-29 · Published · cited 21× · 278 F.3d 971; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1089; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 806; 2002 A.M.C. 650; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1201
278 F.3d 971 Joe HARPER, and the class of similarly situated persons; Alex Morrow, and the class of similarly situated persons; Jason McBride, and the class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES SEAFOODS LP; Seafreeze Alaska F/V, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-35264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dece
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994-06-21 · Published · cited 10× · 27 F.3d 426; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4626; 94 Daily Journal DAR 8580; 1994 A.M.C. 2587; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15172
27 F.3d 426 1994 A.M.C. 2587 Robert DAVIS Sr., Personal Representative of the Estate ofRobert Davis Jr.; Janice Schneider, Personal Representativeof the Estate of Matthew Schneider; and John Bauer,Personal Representative of the Estate of John Dieterich,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BENDER SHIPBUILDING AND REPAIR CO., INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-36826.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016-08-09 · Published · cited 15× · 199 F. Supp. 3d 334; 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2190; 95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 606; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104920; 2016 WL 4203402
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Abdulrahman Alharbi is a twenty-three-year-old student from Saudi Ara*340bia, who resides in Revere, Massachusetts. He was a spectator at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013, was injured in the bombing, and was questioned by federal authorities investigating the e