Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION ... 933 A. Procedural History .. .934 B. Factual Findings. ... 938 ILLEGAL ANALYSIS . . 939 A. Issue

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00079-CV LARRY JOE MORGAN APPELLANT V. BENSON VARGHESE APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRI

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) v. ) ID No. 1703001172 ) Cr. A. Nos. IN17-03-0408, etc. KASHIEM D. THOMAS, ) Defendant. ) Submitted: September 17, 2024 Decided: December 16, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Upon Defendant K

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Daniel Scott filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Mary Benson provided him constitutionally deficient medical care. The district court denied Benson’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. We conclude that the district court applied the wrong constitutional standard and, therefore, vacate the denial of summary judgme

887 A.2d 525 (2005) 389 Md. 615 Crystal A. BENSON, et al. v. STATE of Maryland, et al. No. 7, September Term, 2005. Court of Appeals of Maryland. December 7, 2005. *527 Marshall N. Perkins (Charles J. Piven of Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A., Baltimore; Roger R. Munn, Jr., of the Law Offices of Carl

Justice TIMMER, opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Trent Christopher Benson was sentenced to death and prison terms after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first degree murder and eight other felonies. We have jurisdiction over this automatic appeal pursuant to Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 13-4031.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 10, 2018 Decided March 8, 2019* No. 18-5257 JANE DOE 2, ET AL., APPELLEES v. PATRICK M. SHANAHAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1740 DEWAYNE D. KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS GROSSMAN, JR., M.D., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1740 DEWAYNE D. KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS GROSSMAN, JR., M.D., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Parker Benson, acting pro se, brings this complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Salvador Godinez, the former Warden of the Stateville Correctional Center (“Stateville”), and Theopolis Smith, a Superintendent of Unit H at Stateville. Benson maintains that the conditions of his confinement in Unit H fell below the standards set by t

Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Jose Luis Munoz Santos (“Munoz”), appeals the district court’s denial of habeas *990relief from a magistrate judge’s order certifying Munoz’s extradition to Mexico on charges of kidnapping.1 In his extradition hearing, Munoz sought to introd

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges CLIFTON, M. SMITH, and IKUTA join, dissenting: Hedelito Trinidad y Garcia, a Philippine national, stands accused by the Philippines of kidnaping for ransom. After Philippine authorities requested his extradition so that he might stand trial there for his crime — a request reviewed and approved by the Departments of State and Justice— he was arrested in Los Angeles

461 F.Supp.2d 786 (2006) Wade THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Twyla WALTON, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-969-GPM. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. September 19, 2006. *787 *788 *789 Wade Thomas, Tamms, IL, pro se. Christopher L. Higgerson, Illi

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HEDELITO TRINIDAD Y GARCIA,  Petitioner-Appellee, No. 09-56999 v. D.C. No. LINDA THOMAS,* Warden,  2:08-cv-07719- Metropolitan Detention Center-Los MMM-CW Angeles, OPINION Respondent-Appellant.

380 S.E.2d 36 (1989) Dallas L. BENSON and Rebecca M. Benson, etc., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Patricia Valentino KUTSCH, et al. Defendants Below, The City of Wheeling, Appellee. No. 18223. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. March 28, 1989. James E. Seibert, Linda W. Curtis, Seibert, Kasserman, Karnsworth, Gillenwater, Glauser & Richardson, for Dall

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-2707 ___________ Howard Dean Rouse, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2

947 F.Supp. 827 (1996) Henry BENSON, Petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, et al., Respondents. Henry BENSON, Plaintiff, v. Mary Keating DiSABATO, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 96-3599, 96-3944. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 6, 1996. *828 Henry Benson, Delmont, NJ, pro se. <

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: This case presents the important question of whether state prisoners may bring habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in order to avoid the restrictions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), that unquestionably apply to petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The majority gives t

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Alex Benson, an inmate at Waupun Correctional Institution [WCI] in Waupun, Wisconsin, appeals from the district court’s dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of his eighth amendment claim that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his physical safety needs and serious medical nee