Cases

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING BRUEGGER’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DETERMINING THAT LENDERS DO NOT HAVE PRE-PETITION LIENS ON LEASES; DENYING BRUEGGER’S MOTION TO COMPEL ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND PERSONAL PROPERTY; DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO APPROVE SALE OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF DEBTOR’S ASSETS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS; AND DENYING AS MOOT DEBTOR’S MOTION TO ASSUME AND ASSIGN EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES PAUL R. WARREN, United S

08/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 18, 2018 Session CINDY HATFIELD, ET AL. v. ALLENBROOKE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004249-10 Donna M. Fields, Judge

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

Summer Ledford v. Jenway Contracting, Inc., No. 3, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Eaves, J. MD. CODE ANN., LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT § 9-509(a)— EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY — EXCLUSIVITY The Supreme Court of Maryland held that an employer that complies with the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”) enjoys immunity from suit, including against a wrongful death action brought by a non-dependent adult child for the death of a parent, and that the employer’s exclusive liability is cabined

OPINION AND ORDER Delgado-Hernández, District Judge Joanna Polanco and Yolanda Escudero initiated this employment discrimination, hostile work environment, and .retaliation against UPS Freight Services, Inc. under various Federal and Puerto Rico statutes (Docket No. 31).1 Polanco’s husband, José L. Nevarez, joined in the action, claiming to have suffered damages resulting from

Filed 12/21/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, G059475 v. (Super. Ct. No. 13ZF0163) LONNIE LOREN KOCONTES, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

339 B.R. 542 (2006) In re Michael Charles PICARD, Debtor. Master-Halco, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Michael Charles Picard, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-32010 (ASD). Adversary No. 05-3140(ASD). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. March 23, 2006. *543 *544

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas 10-23-00346-CV Roger Landry, Kenneth Porter and Q.A. Services, L.L.C., Appellants v. Philip Currie and Charlotte Currie, Appellees On appeal from the 77th District Court of Limestone County, Texas

Case: 18-11479 Document: 00515810731 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

*532 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION FOR REMAND JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction In this adversary proceeding, the Court is serving as a stopover on the road to litigation elsewhere because the parties agree that the merits of their dispute should be adjudicated by a court other th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of PCAOB Deposition Transcripts and Plaintiffs Notes and Memoranda of Interviews with Non-Party Witnesses, filed November 28, 2012 (Doc. 90) (“Motion to Compel”);2 (ii) Non-Party KPMG L

976 F.Supp. 976 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Douglas O. RUEDLINGER, Defendant. No. 96-40045-01-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 15, 1997. *977 Richard F. Hayse, Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, Chtd., Topeka, KS, for Gregory L. Smart. James M. Yeretsky, Yeretsky & Maher, LL

HONORABLE KAREN NELSON MOORE, United States Circuit Judge, HONORABLE TIMOTHY S. BLACK, United States District Judge, HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WATSON, United States District Judge *992TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...994 A. General Overview of the Facts...994 B. Procedural History...1009 II

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. What is property? The derivation of the word is simple enough, arising from the Latin proprietas or “ownership,” in turn stemming from proprius, meaning “own” or “proper.” But, this etymology reveals little. Philosophers such as Aristotle, Cicero, Seneca, Grotius, Pufendorf and Locke each, in turn, have debated the meaning of this term, as later did legal luminaries

932 A.2d 571 (2007) 401 Md. 219 Frank CONAWAY, et al. v. Gitanjali DEANE, et al. No. 44, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Appeals of Maryland. September 18, 2007. *579 Robert A. Zarnoch, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen. of Maryland, and Kathryn M. Rowe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Annapolis; Margaret An

ACCEPTED 03-14-00717-CV 3677007 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:35:57 AM