⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Bennett v. Forest Laboratories”

District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015-04-14 · Published · cited 0× · 99 F. Supp. 3d 1360; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48895; 2015 WL 1648240
ORDER1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Forest Laboratories, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.# 74) filed on January 5, 2015. Brett A. Bennett filed a response in opposition on January SO, 2015. (Doc.# 89). Forest Laboratories filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority on April 7, 2015. (Doc.# 155). Bennett filed a Notice of
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 339 F. Supp. 2d 165
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by the County of Suffolk in New York in this multi-district litigation involving allegations of fraud against various pharmaceutical companies.1 Suffolk alleges that Defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers have fraudulently inflated th
State v. Bennettpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-01-21 · Published · cited 23× · 2014 Ohio 160
[Cite as State v. Bennett, 2014-Ohio-160.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 12CA010286 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE TEVIN M. BENNETT
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019-05-07 · Published · cited 14× · 923 F.3d 860
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. *863 The La Sal Mountain Range, located in southeastern Utah on the Colorado Plateau, encompasses the vast acreage of the Manti-La Sal National Forest. The highest elevations of the national forest support one of the rare alpine communities in the region. At these e
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-09-27 · Published · cited 3× · 192 F.3d 922; 1999 WL 754286
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: The Ecology Center, Inc. (“Center”), appeals the dismissal of the Center’s action seeking to compel the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) to comply with its duty under the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600-1614, to monitor the Kootenai National Forest (“KNF”). The court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the action because the Forest Servic
District Court, S.D. New York · 1992-07-07 · Published · cited 34× · 799 F. Supp. 326; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9977; 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,718; 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 221; 1992 WL 189247
799 F.Supp. 326 (1992) Laura KELBER, Plaintiff, v. FOREST ELECTRIC CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 90 Civ. 3790 (LJF). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 7, 1992. *327 *328 *329 Edward Griffith, Katten Muchin & Zavis, New York City, for pl
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998-06-23 · Published · cited 7× · 10 F. Supp. 2d 446; 49 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1920; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16819; 1998 WL 340021
10 F.Supp.2d 446 (1998) BEN VENUE LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. Nos. 98-2006(WGB), 98-2143 (JAG). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 23, 1998. *447 *448 LeBoeuf, Lamb, Green & McRae, LLP by Frederick B. Lacey, Stuart A
District Court, D. Wyoming · 1999-05-13 · Published · cited 7× · 48 F. Supp. 2d 1303; 48 ERC (BNA) 1753; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7198; 1999 WL 306882
48 F.Supp.2d 1303 (1999) COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., Defendants, Biodiversity Associates, et al., Intervenor-Defendants. No. 98-CV-174-B. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. May 13, 1999. *1304 *1305
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008-11-05 · Published · cited 2× · 254 F.R.D. 35; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96877
ORDER RE: SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW SARIS, District Judge. In this qui tarn action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. and *38state law,1 the government has submitted twelve documents for in camera review which it contends are protected by the deliberative proces
Oregon Supreme Court · 1990-06-14 · Published · cited 4× · 794 P.2d 428; 310 Or. 72; 1990 Ore. LEXIS 144
794 P.2d 428 (1990) 310 Or. 72 NORTHWEST MEDICAL LABORATORIES, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and East Portland X-Ray Clinic, P.C., an Oregon Professional Corporation, Petitioners On Review, v. BLUE CROSS and Blue Shield of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, Oregon Preferred Care Network, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, a
Idaho Supreme Court · 1965-02-17 · Published · cited 15× · 399 P.2d 270; 88 Idaho 300; 1965 Ida. LEXIS 414
399 P.2d 270 (1965) Dorothy BENNETT, formerly Dorothy Lunsford, on her own behalf as surviving widow of Leonard Lester Lunsford, Deceased, and as natural guardian of William Leonard Lunsford, minor dependent of deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BUNKER HILL COMPANY, Self-insured employer, Defendant-Respondent. No. 9315. Supreme Court of Idaho. February 17, 1965.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-08-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NY Slip Op 04792
Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 04792) Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 04792 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New Y
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018-11-20 · Published · cited 2× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 1100
Chief Judge Rubén Castillo, United States District Court Lecat's Ventriloscope ("Plaintiff") filed this suit against MT Tool and Manufacturing ("Defendant") for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,645,141 (the "'141 Patent"). (R. 1, Compl.) The trial previously set for August 2018 was recently vacated
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
04/05/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 25, 2022 Session VIRGINIA CRAWLEY V. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY TENNESSEE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-906-I Patricia Head Moskal, Chancellor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-02-11 · Published · cited 4× · 142 N.Y.S.3d 688; 191 A.D.3d 1444; 2021 NY Slip Op 00952
Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 00952) Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 00952 Decided on February 11, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New
State v. Dikeospublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024-02-14 · Published · cited 14× · 544 P.3d 1020; 330 Or. App. 698
698 February 14, 2024 No. 94 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. REES GILMORE DIKEOS, Defendant-Appellant. Yamhill County Circuit Court 18CR36194; A173183 Ladd J. Wiles, Judge. Argued and submitted September 26, 2023. Daniel C. Bennett, Deputy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-08-25 · Published · cited 21× · 46 F.4th 991
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE No. 21-15420 OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF D.C. No. CONNECTICUT; STATE OF 3:18-cv-03018- DELAWARE; STATE OF FLORIDA; JCS STATE OF GEORGIA; STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF INDIANA; STATE OF IOWA; STATE OPINION OF LOUISIANA; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE O
Church v. Bidenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN CHURCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-2815 (CKK) JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 74 F. Supp. 3d 947; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15608; 2015 WL 541746
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING ABUSE-OF-TRUST ENHANCEMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS /. INTRODUCTION........................................................950 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND...............................................955 A. Undisputed Facts ...................................................955
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-01-26 · Published · cited 2× · 234 N.E.3d 1168; 2024 Ohio 266
[Cite as Gauthier v. Gauthier, 2024-Ohio-266.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO FORREST P. GAUTHIER, : APPEAL NO. C-220521 TRIAL NO. A-1303244 Plaintiff-Appellant, : : O P I N I O N. VS.