Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Bennett v. Forest Laboratories”
Bennett ex rel. Bennett v. Forest Laboratoriespublic domain
ORDER1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Forest Laboratories, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.# 74) filed on January 5, 2015. Brett A. Bennett filed a response in opposition on January SO, 2015. (Doc.# 89). Forest Laboratories filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority on April 7, 2015. (Doc.# 155). Bennett filed a Notice of
County of Suffolk v. Abbott Laboratoriespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by the County of Suffolk in New York in this multi-district litigation involving allegations of fraud against various pharmaceutical companies.1 Suffolk alleges that Defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers have fraudulently inflated th
State v. Bennettpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Bennett, 2014-Ohio-160.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 12CA010286 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE TEVIN M. BENNETT
Utah Native Plant Society v. U.S. Forest Servicepublic domain
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. *863 The La Sal Mountain Range, located in southeastern Utah on the Colorado Plateau, encompasses the vast acreage of the Manti-La Sal National Forest. The highest elevations of the national forest support one of the rare alpine communities in the region. At these e
Ecology Center, Inc. v. United States Forest Servicepublic domain
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: The Ecology Center, Inc. (“Center”), appeals the dismissal of the Center’s action seeking to compel the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) to comply with its duty under the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600-1614, to monitor the Kootenai National Forest (“KNF”). The court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the action because the Forest Servic
Kelber v. Forest Electric Corp.public domain
799 F.Supp. 326 (1992) Laura KELBER, Plaintiff, v. FOREST ELECTRIC CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 90 Civ. 3790 (LJF). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 7, 1992. *327 *328 *329 Edward Griffith, Katten Muchin & Zavis, New York City, for pl
10 F.Supp.2d 446 (1998) BEN VENUE LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. Nos. 98-2006(WGB), 98-2143 (JAG). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 23, 1998. *447 *448 LeBoeuf, Lamb, Green & McRae, LLP by Frederick B. Lacey, Stuart A
48 F.Supp.2d 1303 (1999) COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., Defendants, Biodiversity Associates, et al., Intervenor-Defendants. No. 98-CV-174-B. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. May 13, 1999. *1304 *1305
United States ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.public domain
ORDER RE: SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW SARIS, District Judge. In this qui tarn action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. and *38state law,1 the government has submitted twelve documents for in camera review which it contends are protected by the deliberative proces
794 P.2d 428 (1990) 310 Or. 72 NORTHWEST MEDICAL LABORATORIES, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and East Portland X-Ray Clinic, P.C., an Oregon Professional Corporation, Petitioners On Review, v. BLUE CROSS and Blue Shield of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, Oregon Preferred Care Network, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, a
Bennett v. Bunker Hill Companypublic domain
399 P.2d 270 (1965) Dorothy BENNETT, formerly Dorothy Lunsford, on her own behalf as surviving widow of Leonard Lester Lunsford, Deceased, and as natural guardian of William Leonard Lunsford, minor dependent of deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BUNKER HILL COMPANY, Self-insured employer, Defendant-Respondent. No. 9315. Supreme Court of Idaho. February 17, 1965.
Dreamco Dev. Corp. v. Empire State Dev. Corp.public domain
Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 04792) Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 04792 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New Y
Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.public domain
Chief Judge Rubén Castillo, United States District Court Lecat's Ventriloscope ("Plaintiff") filed this suit against MT Tool and Manufacturing ("Defendant") for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,645,141 (the "'141 Patent"). (R. 1, Compl.) The trial previously set for August 2018 was recently vacated
04/05/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 25, 2022 Session VIRGINIA CRAWLEY V. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY TENNESSEE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-906-I Patricia Head Moskal, Chancellor
Dreamco Dev. Corp. v. Empire State Dev. Corp.public domain
Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 00952) Dreamco Dev. Corp. v Empire State Dev. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 00952 Decided on February 11, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New
State v. Dikeospublic domain
698 February 14, 2024 No. 94 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. REES GILMORE DIKEOS, Defendant-Appellant. Yamhill County Circuit Court 18CR36194; A173183 Ladd J. Wiles, Judge. Argued and submitted September 26, 2023. Daniel C. Bennett, Deputy
Zachary Silbersher v. Allergan, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE No. 21-15420 OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF D.C. No. CONNECTICUT; STATE OF 3:18-cv-03018- DELAWARE; STATE OF FLORIDA; JCS STATE OF GEORGIA; STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF INDIANA; STATE OF IOWA; STATE OPINION OF LOUISIANA; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE O
Church v. Bidenpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN CHURCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-2815 (CKK) JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
United States v. Bartlesonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING ABUSE-OF-TRUST ENHANCEMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS /. INTRODUCTION........................................................950 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND...............................................955 A. Undisputed Facts ...................................................955
Gauthier v. Gauthierpublic domain
[Cite as Gauthier v. Gauthier, 2024-Ohio-266.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO FORREST P. GAUTHIER, : APPEAL NO. C-220521 TRIAL NO. A-1303244 Plaintiff-Appellant, : : O P I N I O N. VS.