⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Bennett Edward Hortman, II”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-11-05 · Published · cited 15× · 2020 Ohio 5178
[Cite as Widok v. Estate of Wolf, 2020-Ohio-5178.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA GERALD A. WIDOK, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 108717 v. : ESTATE OF MARY WOLF, ET AL.,
State v. Mizellpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998-07-20 · Published · cited 9× · 504 S.E.2d 338; 332 S.C. 273; 1998 S.C. App. LEXIS 100
332 S.C. 273 (1998) 504 S.E.2d 338 The STATE, Respondent, v. William Rawls MIZELL, Appellant. No. 2872. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted June 2, 1998. Decided July 20, 1998. Rehearing Denied September 18, 1998. *274 William I. Diggs, Myrtle Beach, for appellan
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-05-14 · Published · cited 70× · 718 F.3d 460; 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20109; 2013 WL 1975849; 76 ERC (BNA) 1489; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9705
HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: A group of Mississippi Gulf Coast residents and property owners (“Plaintiffs”) alleged that emissions by energy companies (“Defendants”) contributed to global warming, which intensified Hurricane Katrina, which, in turn, damaged their property. The district court dismissed their claims with prejudice. A panel of this court reversed, in part, the district court’s dismissal. Before mandate could issue,